Nothing wrong with them AT ALL . . . but pretty much they’re still a 1911 if I’m right. Hey, I LOVE 1911’s for what they are i.e. a 100 year old design. And yeah, they work surprisingly well to this day, BUT they’re not “the best”, anymore, for what I’d call primary self-defense weapons. To me, anything SA-only is at a REAL disadvantage when compared to the other actions out there. Anytime you add an operation to drawing the weapon and firing on a target, you increase your risk of failure. Maybe at one time that risk was worth it because there were few viable alternatives, but now, eh, not so much.
Everyone always forgets about them. . . .
Again, a fine weapon and somewhat of a niche gun. That being said, put next to a G20, TECHNICALLY, it’s out-matched almost all over. That’s NOT to say I wouldn’t feel comfy with a Para in my hand if the crap hit the fan! Where I don’t feel comfy is when it’s in my belt, C&L with the safety on, and instances like that.
I do get the cocked and locked single action reason. That isn't for everyone, but if someone is comfortable with that mode, then that overcomes your final objection.
Not exactly. It doesn’t overcome the fact that you have to take an additional step to get the gun ready. And like my favorite TBI officer says, “when fingers turn to flippers, I want a Glock”. I’m pretty good at catching the safety on my 1911 . . . but I’m MUCH better at not having to catch the safety at all on one of my Glocks.
Being comfortable with it is one thing. Being PERFECT with it while people are shooting at you (or your family) is another thing. NOT HAVING TO WORRY ABOUT IT . . . that’s the better answer.
Did I mention I love 1911’s? It’s the first gun that goes into my bag headed to the range.
