• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Help Proove Physics Teacher Wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter DRock9
  • Start date Start date Apr 24, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
D

DRock9

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
359
0
0
Apr 24, 2007
#1
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #1
My physics teacher feels very strongly that you will not increase the force, due to friction, required to turn a wheel if you deflate the tire. I asked her, well why then is it harder to pedal a bike when the tires are flat, and she did not have an answer for me. I also ask, well why then do they say that inflating your tires increases your gas mileage, and also why do you deflate your tires when you go to the track?

She claims then when you deflate, or inflate your tires the change in surface area does not have any effect on friction what-so-ever.

This goes against anything I have ever read, can anyone clarify this?

Thanks!
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 24, 2007
#2
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #2
Ok well it does have an effect on friction because depending oh how much your tire is inflated you can see different contact patterns with the road. For instance an over inflated tire wears out the center of the tire and not the edges. An under inflated tire wears the outer edge of tread and not the center. I would ask her to show you the formula that proves her statement. I remember my physics teacher coming up with some strange things when I was taking it. Conservation of Force??? I can't remember but it had to do with if you jump the earth has to move up to u a little?? I laughed my a$$ off. I asked if we got every human on the earth to move to one country and we all jumped at the same time could we pull the earth out of orbit? It seemed silly to me but after all they are the smartest dumb people I have met. ( actually maybe engineers are)
 

Aryan15

Member
Sep 22, 2003
236
0
17
CA
Apr 24, 2007
#3
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #3
It would definately take more force to move something with flat or low tires, unless you're on ice or something.
 
G

GTSETGO

New Member
Feb 12, 2007
0
0
0
Cincinnati, Ohio
Apr 24, 2007
#4
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #4
DRock9 said:
She claims then when you deflate, or inflate your tires the change in surface area does not have any effect on friction what-so-ever.
Click to expand...

I found this info, hope it helps..

If the coefficient of friction is held constant, increasing surface area does not increase the force of friction. That's technically true, but in practice:

There are exceptions: Friction and area of contact

The coefficient of friction depends upon surface roughness, molecular adhesion, and deformation effects. A fully inflated tire has greater resistance to deformation than a softer tire. In other words, the coefficient of friction is different for a flat tire than a fully inflated tire.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 24, 2007
#5
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #5
http://code.eng.buffalo.edu/dat/sites/tire/tire.html
maybe you can make heads or tales of this. It does use tire pressure to help firgure out friction. This is way above me however.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Apr 24, 2007
#6
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #6
Both of you are correct in sorts though I think there is a misunderstanding between you two. Look in your book for rolling resistance.
Kevin
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Apr 24, 2007
#7
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #7
The coefficient of friction depends upon surface roughness, molecular adhesion, and deformation effects. A fully inflated tire has greater resistance to deformation than a softer tire. In other words, the coefficient of friction is different for a flat tire than a fully inflated tire.[/QUOTE]

Exactly....thats the difference right there.
 

Mr Grim

New Member
Dec 29, 2006
58
0
0
Apr 24, 2007
#8
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #8
A simple demonstration/experiment for your teacher. Deflate one rear tire to 10 lbs and leave the other side at 35 lbs. Now go for a leisurely 50 mph drive on a long, safe road. After 30 minutes, have her get out and place her hand on each tire. Which one is warmer? Where did that heat come from??
Disclaimer: This experiment is hypothetical and no-one should be driving around on a half-flat tire.
 
D

DRock9

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
359
0
0
Apr 24, 2007
#9
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #9
"The coefficient of friction depends upon surface roughness, molecular adhesion, and deformation effects. A fully inflated tire has greater resistance to deformation than a softer tire. In other words, the coefficient of friction is different for a flat tire than a fully inflated tire."

Thank you! That is pretty much what I was looking for right there.

She claimed that if you deflate your tires it will not help you get out of sand or help you on the ice, I do not know about the ice part but it helps in my friends 4x4 in the sand and on rocks I can tell ya that much.
 

Mr Grim

New Member
Dec 29, 2006
58
0
0
Apr 24, 2007
#10
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #10
Oops, misread your question/purpose. Let us know what her reply is.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Apr 24, 2007
#11
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #11
and this is Mustang tech how????

--drop kicked to the Talk section--
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Apr 24, 2007
#12
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #12
DRock9 said:
She claimed that if you deflate your tires it will not help you get out of sand or help you on the ice, I do not know about the ice part but it helps in my friends 4x4 in the sand and on rocks I can tell ya that much.
Click to expand...

Your teacher is clearly a moron. It's common sense.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Apr 24, 2007
#13
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #13
dang, i must've mispelled stangnet for nasa...
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Apr 24, 2007
#14
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #14
do this...get a car..put it in natural and push...do the same but with all 4 tires flat...there you proved him wrong... same thing if your tire are deflated you lost some MPG....
 

89five.o

Member
Jul 8, 2005
26
5
19
Apr 24, 2007
#15
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #15
86bluecobra said:
Ok well it does have an effect on friction because depending oh how much your tire is inflated you can see different contact patterns with the road. For instance an over inflated tire wears out the center of the tire and not the edges. An under inflated tire wears the outer edge of tread and not the center. I would ask her to show you the formula that proves her statement. I remember my physics teacher coming up with some strange things when I was taking it. Conservation of Force??? I can't remember but it had to do with if you jump the earth has to move up to u a little?? I laughed my a$$ off. I asked if we got every human on the earth to move to one country and we all jumped at the same time could we pull the earth out of orbit? It seemed silly to me but after all they are the smartest dumb people I have met. ( actually maybe engineers are)
Click to expand...

Thank an engineer everytime you sit in that car of yours
 

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Apr 24, 2007
#16
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #16
Daggar said:
and this is Mustang tech how????

--drop kicked to the Talk section--
Click to expand...

LMFAO
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 24, 2007
#17
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #17
89five.o said:
Thank an engineer everytime you sit in that car of yours
Click to expand...

LOL yah yah. I know thats why I say they are the Smartest dumb people. I know they are very smart but from my experience common sence eludes them. Have you ever worked with an "engineered" sytem or thing and when you go to use it you say hey if they did this it would be easier to install or use?
 

89five.o

Member
Jul 8, 2005
26
5
19
Apr 24, 2007
#18
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #18
Hahah yeah like working on cars you need to be houdini to reach some spots.....eh I'll be an engineer soon and everyone will be whining about my crap. I'll be working for GM this summer so it'll be hard to screw up and not actually make an improvement.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 24, 2007
#19
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #19
I'll give contribute this (which is probably what the instructor is getting at)...

fs < us n

fk = uk n

fs = magitude of static frictional forces
fk = magnitude of kinetic frictional forces
us = static coefficient of friction (usually this is a 'look-up' value)
uk = kinetic coefficient of friction (usually a 'look-up' value)
n = normal force of the object. For example the Force of tires on the concrete, or Force of a brake pad on a rotor.

There is no allowance for the surface area of the contact area, when calculating the Frictional Forces.

The above works on the assumption that the 2 surfaces are 'hard'





The following explains a little as to how 'soft' surfaces are different...
http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/friction_equation.htm
Coefficient when surfaces not hard and sliding

In the case where a surface is soft, there is molecular adhesion, and in rolling and fluid friction, the coefficient of friction is not a simple number. The coefficient may be dependent on the area of the surfaces, the amount of deformation, the amount of adhesion, the shape of the surfaces, the radius of the wheel or the viscosity of the fluid.
What this means is that although the standard friction equation holds in these cases, the coefficient of friction will only hold for a specific configuration. In other words, you can't accurately give something like the coefficient of rolling friction for a rubber tire on pavement without stating the type of rubber, area on the pavement, inflation of the tire, and its tread pattern.
Click to expand...

Basically, hard surfaces are simpler to work with mathematically, which is why these equations are used in 101 level physics classes.

Soft surfaces are much tougher to work with.


jason
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 24, 2007
#20
  • Apr 24, 2007
  • #20
That site is pretty cool.

They also had this
http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/frictionrolling.htm
Coefficient of rolling friction
Rolling friction is not as straightforward as sliding friction. But still, there is a relationship between the rolling friction and the normal force, similar to that in sliding friction. Often the coefficient of rolling friction is determined by assuming a form of the Standard Friction Equation holds:

FR = μR*W

where

FR is the resistive force of rolling friction,
μR is the coefficient of rolling friction for the two surfaces (Greek letter "mu" sub R), and
W is the weight of the wheel (in the case of a wheel rolling on the ground surface).
Other factors in coefficient
The coefficient of rolling friction, μR, isn't a simple number as in the case of sliding friction for hard materials. Instead, it is proportional to the width of the wheel and inversely proportional to the radius. In the case of soft wheels and tires, μR the surface area of the tire on the ground is a factor.

Determining the coefficient
A way that μR is determined is by rolling a wheel at an initial velocity, v, and then measuring the time, t, that it takes to stop.

μR = v/(t*g)

where g is the acceleration of gravity 9.8 m/s2 or 32 ft/s2.

This method and equation can be used with hard or soft wheels. Although it does not require the weight or size of the wheel to be known, it only applies for a wheel similar to that being measured.
Click to expand...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
N
Paint and Body Body Surface Rust.. Need Help.
  • Neptuned
  • Sep 9, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2022
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?