• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

help!!! what the hell is wrong here!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter KconoverK
  • Start date Start date May 1, 2004
K

KconoverK

New Member
May 6, 2003
158
0
0
Landing, NJ
May 1, 2004
#1
  • May 1, 2004
  • #1
ok I first dynoed my car and I got 197hp and 260 something for the tq ... after doing the following mods I got 238hp and 272tq
01 PI heads
01 PI cams
01 PI intake
87mm Pro-m Air meter
C&L intake plenum
77mm throttle body
and a tune that is basically perfect all the curves are smooth but I am runnin a little rich we are correcting that now... other people that have done this swap got at least 250hp and almost 300 tq. What could be the problem or is there no problem??? could the air meter be leading to my problems??
 

03-s281

New Member
Jan 20, 2004
421
0
0
Stangville,TN
May 1, 2004
#2
  • May 1, 2004
  • #2
sounds good to me.
 
O

okc2KGT

New Member
Oct 27, 2003
91
0
0
Oklahoma City
May 1, 2004
#3
  • May 1, 2004
  • #3
there is no problem. i dont see how people could get 250rwhp from a pi swap and maf.
 

krly79

Member
May 6, 2003
464
0
16
VA Beach & So Illinois
May 1, 2004
#4
  • May 1, 2004
  • #4
KconoverK said:
ok I first dynoed my car and I got 197hp and 260 something for the tq ... after doing the following mods I got 238hp and 272tq
01 PI heads
01 PI cams
01 PI intake
87mm Pro-m Air meter
C&L intake plenum
77mm throttle body
and a tune that is basically perfect all the curves are smooth but I am runnin a little rich we are correcting that now... other people that have done this swap got at least 250hp and almost 300 tq. What could be the problem or is there no problem??? could the air meter be leading to my problems??
Click to expand...


To me, That does seem a little low considering that is about stock 99+ #'s. Usually when the swap is done they dyno more than stock 99+ because of the higher compression. It sounds a little low to me, but that's just my opinion Anyone else?
 
B

billyfe390

New Member
Aug 18, 2003
573
0
0
May 1, 2004
#5
  • May 1, 2004
  • #5
krly79 said:
To me, That does seem a little low considering that is about stock 99+ #'s. Usually when the swap is done they dyno more than stock 99+ because of the higher compression. It sounds a little low to me, but that's just my opinion Anyone else?
Click to expand...

His is a little low my headswap with no mods untuned was 228 and 270 tuned was 242 and 282. The only power producing mod on there is the upper plenum. Lose the MAF it is a waste anyway and see what happens.
 
B

billyfe390

New Member
Aug 18, 2003
573
0
0
May 1, 2004
#6
  • May 1, 2004
  • #6
90cent said:
there is no problem. i dont see how people could get 250rwhp from a pi swap and maf.
Click to expand...
Tuned you can come close it just depends where you are at but the MAF does absolutely nothing you dont need it.
 
K

KconoverK

New Member
May 6, 2003
158
0
0
Landing, NJ
May 1, 2004
#7
  • May 1, 2004
  • #7
even though I have a tune already won't swaping the MAf screw up the tune???
 

KaPPaBaLL

New Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,326
0
0
BAYAREA
May 1, 2004
#8
  • May 1, 2004
  • #8
what gear dyno run was this?
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
May 2, 2004
#9
  • May 2, 2004
  • #9
KconoverK said:
even though I have a tune already won't swaping the MAf screw up the tune???
Click to expand...


if its been tuned with tht meter on it , leave it alone , its not hurting you since its tuned , bad part is if you dont have enough airflow to peg the voltage on the stock one you just spent money you didnt have to . but I would leave it on since you do have it tuned properly . whats your air/fuel running ?? post some graphs maybe someone can chime in , but unless you have longtubes the HP and TQ seems about right to me .
 
K

KconoverK

New Member
May 6, 2003
158
0
0
Landing, NJ
May 2, 2004
#10
  • May 2, 2004
  • #10
the graphs are in my car I will get them on here in a couple of days
 
W

White96GTinFla

Banned
Feb 28, 2002
1,075
0
0
Naples, Florida
May 2, 2004
#11
  • May 2, 2004
  • #11
looks OK. but not as good as it could have been. I was in the upper 250s and 290s with NO tune

hope you get everything worked out.
 

slvrbullIT

New Member
May 27, 2003
635
0
0
Dallas, TX
May 2, 2004
#12
  • May 2, 2004
  • #12
90cent said:
there is no problem. i dont see how people could get 250rwhp from a pi swap and maf.
Click to expand...
i dynoed 252rwhp/290rwtq before my plenum/TB and dont have a tune yet. after the tune i hope to be around 265rwhp/305rwtq.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
May 2, 2004
#13
  • May 2, 2004
  • #13
yeah I thought they were all 245+ RWHP untuned
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Need tuning help!
  • 93LXVERTFL
  • Sep 11, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 16, 2023
Monkeybutt2000
M
Engine Backfiring and Shaking Pony
  • Krazykyle44
  • Mar 15, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 17, 2021
General karthief
M
Car Not Staying On? Help
  • michaelgt
  • Nov 3, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 7, 2017
michaelgt
M
B
Engine Engine Starts, Idles Fine But When I Push The Peddle It Dies.
  • Ballista
  • May 29, 2013
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 31, 2013
Ballista
B
D
Newbie Needs Help With Slight Idle Issue And Hesitation
  • DanstangLI
  • Aug 30, 2014
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 20, 2014
DanstangLI
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?