• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

Higher octane gas on Coyote 5.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lordstout
  • Start date Start date Sep 14, 2011
L

Lordstout

Member
Jul 20, 2011
33
0
6
Sep 14, 2011
#1
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #1
Anybody know if you get any performance benefit from running higher than 93 octane gas on the new Coyote 5.0s? I know there's a benefit between running 87 and 91/93, but if I top off with 1/4 tank of 105, would it be worth it? Just curious, going to the track tonight for test/tune.
 
B

bigb427

Member
Nov 3, 2010
128
2
19
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 14, 2011
#2
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #2
Ford specifies the use of 91 octane for the new 5.0. If your car is stock, or only has minor modifications, you will just waste your money by using 105 octane in it.
Using higher than needed octane may even make it run worse, the most common side effect being hard starts. This applies to all cars, not just the new 5.0 Coyote equipped Mustangs.
 

blown1989saleen

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2001
1,397
0
37
oxford,pa
Sep 14, 2011
#3
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #3
there is about a 10hp difference from 87-93 octane, Id make it a habit to run the highest octane you have available, but as said there is no reason to run 105
 
S

StangLover95

New Member
Sep 3, 2011
4
0
0
StL
Sep 14, 2011
#4
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #4
Over Drive Band Broken

hey guys i have a 95 v6 3.8l with and AODE transmission and the over drive band is broken i turn the over drive off and drive it can that hurt the car in anyway? is there any problems that can be caused by a broken overdrive? basicly what im trying to say is will driving with a broken overdrive band hurt anything on my car? please please please let me know guys this is very important
 

LAVAgt2012

Well-Known Member
Aug 11, 2011
1,098
28
58
Panama City, FL
Sep 15, 2011
#5
  • Sep 15, 2011
  • #5
blown1989saleen said:
there is about a 10hp difference from 87-93 octane, Id make it a habit to run the highest octane you have available, but as said there is no reason to run 105
Click to expand...

what he said, running 87 it was advertised 402 hp, running 93 is where you get the actual 412....myself I just run midgrade, i think it's 89 here
 
B

bigb427

Member
Nov 3, 2010
128
2
19
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 15, 2011
#6
  • Sep 15, 2011
  • #6
Just so there is no confusion it should be stated that the octane of the gas by itself does nothing to increase or decrease power. When running lower than recommended octane the engine will be prone to experiencing detonation. When detonation occurs the computer retards the ignition timing which in turn will reduce the power output of the engine.
I'm not sure where the 10 horsepower number came from, I'd expect more of a loss than that myself.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Sep 15, 2011
#7
  • Sep 15, 2011
  • #7
I would run the lowest octane I could get away with. Lower octane = more volatile, so more power for the given rating. Yes, if you run 93, you could potentially make more power, if you can take advantage of it.
 

LAVAgt2012

Well-Known Member
Aug 11, 2011
1,098
28
58
Panama City, FL
Sep 15, 2011
#8
  • Sep 15, 2011
  • #8
bigb427 said:
Just so there is no confusion it should be stated that the octane of the gas by itself does nothing to increase or decrease power. When running lower than recommended octane the engine will be prone to experiencing detonation. When detonation occurs the computer retards the ignition timing which in turn will reduce the power output of the engine.
I'm not sure where the 10 horsepower number came from, I'd expect more of a loss than that myself.
Click to expand...

2012 Ford Mustang | View Full Engine Specifications | Ford.com

you sound a bit confused of the numbers that are spoken of, let me save you some time on your research. This is where the 10hp comes from that we speak of 402 hp on reg, and 412 on prem, but hey who knows you may know more than the ford.com engine spec page
 
B

bigb427

Member
Nov 3, 2010
128
2
19
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 15, 2011
#9
  • Sep 15, 2011
  • #9
Confused - no. Just haven't heard that about the 5.0 before.
Interesting, I have not seen that before. I had only seen this page: http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2011_Mustang_GT_Specs.pdf

It looks like Ford has tweaked some things on the 2012 vs. the 2011 Mustang GT.
 

LAVAgt2012

Well-Known Member
Aug 11, 2011
1,098
28
58
Panama City, FL
Sep 16, 2011
#10
  • Sep 16, 2011
  • #10
bigb427 said:
Confused - no. Just haven't heard that about the 5.0 before.
Interesting, I have not seen that before. I had only seen this page: http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2011_Mustang_GT_Specs.pdf

It looks like Ford has tweaked some things on the 2012 vs. the 2011 Mustang GT.
Click to expand...

Possibly, there isn't many differents between the two. The 2011 is pretty much the safe car....My guess would be is someone actually dyno'd it, and complained because they didn't get the results ford advertised because the mustang doesn't recommend any fuel, it just says no E85. That would be my guess on why they added that to the page, but once again that's only me speculating on the issue (too many sue happy americans now adays over retarded (sorry if that word affends anyone )junk to try and make a quick dime)
 

beviking

Active Member
Aug 29, 2011
228
9
29
Syracuse,NY
Sep 18, 2011
#11
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #11
LAVAgt2012 said:
...(too many sue happy americans now adays over retarded (sorry if that word affends anyone )junk to try and make a quick dime)
Click to expand...

I'll 2nd that!
 

mbuckcoyote

Member
Feb 5, 2011
86
4
19
Portand, Or.
Sep 18, 2011
#12
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #12
Allow me to further unconfuse the situation with the below link. You can see in my signature that I have done a base line on my car and it shows what I got on 87 octane. This was done on a load bearing dyno so the numbers may appear to be low compared to others but, if you do the math and add the standard 15%, it will show that it translates into 406BHp/418lbft. The base dyno was done with car car completely stock, no mods.

You may find the article an interesting read if you haven't seen it before. It tells pretty much the story behind the 5.0.




2011 Mustang GT Coyote Engine - 5.0 Mustang & Fast Fords
 
N

Newby

New Member
Sep 18, 2011
10
0
2
Sep 21, 2011
#13
  • Sep 21, 2011
  • #13
sorry guys, but what is coyote engine?
 
B

bigb427

Member
Nov 3, 2010
128
2
19
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 21, 2011
#14
  • Sep 21, 2011
  • #14
"Coyote" is the codename Ford gave to the new 5.0 liter engine used in 2011 and newer Mustang GT's while the engine was in development.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
245
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
814
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
716
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
442
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?