• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Hollow-stemmed valves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Route666
  • Start date Start date Feb 27, 2006

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Feb 27, 2006
#1
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #1
Anyone heard of, thought about, or used hollow-stemmed or hollow-stemmed, Sodium-filled valves?

I think if you combine them with beehive springs, and the smaller retainer that comes along with them, even in moly, not Titanium, you'll have less valvetrain mass than by using conventional double or triple springs, and Ti retainers AND valves.

Plus you'll have the longer lasting stainless valves and moly retainers.

Plus you'll have less spring poundage sapping power.

And better spring resonance dampening, leading to more potential rpm.


If you use less poundage on the spring, the strength of the two-piece, hollow valve will be less of an issue. If you combine it with a cam that isn't overly agressive, I'm thinking it'd be a decent setup.

I worked out that over standard dual springs, stainless valves and moly retainers you would save, at 6500rpm, 80lb of mass from moving around in the valvetrain EVERY SECOND.

I'm wondering why, like beehives, I haven't heard much of them. Is it a strength issue?

Looking forward to your input!
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Feb 28, 2006
#2
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #2
This combo was written up in MMFF in '04 or '05 by David Vizard. He acheived the kind of gains you describe. The valves are relatively expensive, but much less than Ti, and the beehives have their detractors. I spent a lot of time looking into beehives. The top shop in my area advised against them because there is no damper or second spring - if one breaks, the valve goes directly into the cylinder. He had seen a few go that way when coupled with big cams. On smaller cams, it would be much less of a concern. I woulnd up going with a cam/spring combo from Ed Curtis. It should be good to 6500RPM, which is all I was looking for.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 28, 2006
#3
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #3
sodium valves, and hollow stem valves have their place in a race engines. you can even use them in hot street engines as well, but for the most part they are not needed, and would be a waste of money, with perhaps the exception of sodium filled exhaust valves in a medium or heavy duty application. and that only to help keep exhaust valve temps in line under heard use.

the way that these valves are made, leaves them particularly vulnerable to breaking if the friction weld has a flaw in it.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Mar 1, 2006
#4
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #4
Thanks for the input. I get all excited when I read about something new to me that makes something lighter or stronger, etc.

I read further about the filled ones, and they're filled with a soduim AND potassium compound. One reacts violently in water and the other does so in just air, so lets put them in the hottest place imaginable - in the stems of the exhaust valve lol.


One last query - something to think about - Do they seal the hollow valves in a vacuum? If they go so far as to make them hollow, surely to do it properly you'd think they'd try and get a vacuum in there.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Mar 1, 2006
#5
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #5
Some of the old 427's had sodium filled valves, they had problems with the heads poping off. Part of this I think is due to age, and maybe technology of the 60's, but I recall that sodium reacts with the valve material and eats it from the inside out over time.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Mar 2, 2006
#6
  • Mar 2, 2006
  • #6
Yeh I can imagine it eating the valve away. It sounds like one of those race only frequent replacement things like Titanium valves (because they or the soft valve seats you use for them wear quick).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
762
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine Roller Rocker to Valve Retainer Interference - Possible Source of Valve Train Noise
  • AeroCoupe
  • May 22, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2023
AeroCoupe
H
Drivetrain 4R70W clutch friction/metals/piston set up questions for transmission guru
  • Hizdudeness
  • Apr 4, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
958
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 15, 2024
slow84lx
S
SOLD 1993 Mustang Cobra / 114K miles / Modified / Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  • Naja
  • Oct 4, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
5
Views
12K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Feb 26, 2025
Naja
Broken Exhaust Valve Retaining Clips
  • Whoohoo2260
  • Jun 22, 2019
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 22, 2019
Whoohoo2260
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?