• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Horsepower guess?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stranadan
  • Start date Start date Nov 28, 2009
S

stranadan

New Member
Nov 12, 2009
3
0
0
Nov 28, 2009
#1
  • Nov 28, 2009
  • #1
Hey there, I'm new to stangnet and mustangs in general... I got an 88 mustang lx not too long ago and have been arguing with my friends about how much power it has, I know the only way to really know how much power it has is a dyno but I don't know of any close by and thought you guys on here could probably give me a good guess to how much power it is putting out. It has a 5.0 swap with 351 heads, lunati .610 cam, underdrive pulleys, holley 600 double pumper carb, summit dual plane intake, shorty headers with flowmaster exhaust, msd everything ignition-wise, and stock gears. I know stock it has about 220 but I was curious to how much power the mods on it would add. I was told it could safely wind up to 6500 rpms with the cam change but I'm not sure if that changes much. I appreciate any input you could give and if you have any tips for the setup or to what I should do next with it.
 

Celeb

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
736
13
59
Here and there
Nov 28, 2009
#2
  • Nov 28, 2009
  • #2
Welcome to StangNet

I would imagine our resident guesstimators will be by shortly.
 
S

seedeezy

Member
Nov 27, 2009
41
0
6
Nov 29, 2009
#3
  • Nov 29, 2009
  • #3
Aww. the quest for power.... will it ever be enough...
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Nov 30, 2009
#4
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #4
.610" lift with 351 heads?

wonderful
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Nov 30, 2009
#5
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #5
Not even gonna guess on that "combo". Need more specs as it sounds a bit "off"
 

Shaun1212

New Member
Oct 20, 2009
22
0
0
toronto, canada
Dec 1, 2009
#6
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #6
have to agree with Tanner91

Really strange combo.......
Is it still a 302 with 351 heads? What year are the heads? What's the duration of the cam at 050? Big lift cam with dual plane intake and small carb and shorties?
I'll assume the heads are stock, off of anything with huge chambers that are too big and killing compression. Big cam with dual plane intake and 600 carb? With the mismatch of parts I'm gonna guess........ 290. Just my opinion.
 
M

mikepotts

Member
Jul 23, 2007
81
0
6
Dec 1, 2009
#7
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #7
Shaun1212 said:
Really strange combo.......
Is it still a 302 with 351 heads? What year are the heads? What's the duration of the cam at 050? Big lift cam with dual plane intake and small carb and shorties?
I'll assume the heads are stock, off of anything with huge chambers that are too big and killing compression. Big cam with dual plane intake and 600 carb? With the mismatch of parts I'm gonna guess........ 290. Just my opinion.
Click to expand...

i had a similar motor... mine was a stock shortblock 88 motor w/ b 3o3 cam, DOOE windsor heads ported, eddy, rpm gap intake, 600 dbl pmpr. it made 305hp, now, that was at the flywheel NOT at the rollers, you can look at loosing about 20% thru the drivetrain.
 
M

mikepotts

Member
Jul 23, 2007
81
0
6
Dec 1, 2009
#8
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #8
that cam lift does sound odd... are you sure it didnt have .510 lift? .610 would be large for a big block!
 
S

stranadan

New Member
Nov 12, 2009
3
0
0
Dec 1, 2009
#9
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #9
I'm not positive of the cam lift, thats just what i was told by the person I bought it from, and I couldnt tell you the year of the heads unless there was a way of checking. Since it seems mismatched what should I change? besides the cam of course I don't think I could manage that, thanks for your replies, I never would have known it was a strange setup
 

Shaun1212

New Member
Oct 20, 2009
22
0
0
toronto, canada
Dec 1, 2009
#10
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #10
To mikepotts

I had almost the exact same setup as yours at one point and it was great. I don't doubt your HP. I just said the carb was a little small in comparison to the heads, I didn't mean it wasn't good. Assuming the heads are nothing special with 78cc chambers that will lower compression alot, and I don't know the cam specs. That's why I guessed a little low. 610 is alot of lift and if thats the case the duration would be in the 240-250 range. I cant remember the lift on my cam but its around 650-670 and thats in a fully done 331 built by Paul daSilva. Joe's brother in a low 10 sec car.....
 
M

mikepotts

Member
Jul 23, 2007
81
0
6
Dec 1, 2009
#11
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #11
Shaun1212 said:
I had almost the exact same setup as yours at one point and it was great. I don't doubt your HP. I just said the carb was a little small in comparison to the heads, I didn't mean it wasn't good. Assuming the heads are nothing special with 78cc chambers that will lower compression alot, and I don't know the cam specs. That's why I guessed a little low. 610 is alot of lift and if thats the case the duration would be in the 240-250 range. I cant remember the lift on my cam but its around 650-670 and thats in a fully done 331 built by Paul daSilva. Joe's brother in a low 10 sec car.....
Click to expand...

cool... yeah i thought his lift numbers are strange especially for W heads. im sure you have ALOT more head than him on the 331.
 
M

mikepotts

Member
Jul 23, 2007
81
0
6
Dec 1, 2009
#12
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #12
stranadan said:
I'm not positive of the cam lift, thats just what i was told by the person I bought it from, and I couldnt tell you the year of the heads unless there was a way of checking. Since it seems mismatched what should I change? besides the cam of course I don't think I could manage that, thanks for your replies, I never would have known it was a strange setup
Click to expand...

i know this wont be the answer you are looking for but... the only way to know what to change, is to KNOW for a certainty what you already have, and the only way to tell that is a tear down... so, with that in mind, if it is running well, i would leave it alone and enjoy until you are ready to start fresh.
 
S

stranadan

New Member
Nov 12, 2009
3
0
0
Dec 1, 2009
#13
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #13
Thanks for the help, I think I'm going to throw an air gap on it and call it good.
 

Shaun1212

New Member
Oct 20, 2009
22
0
0
toronto, canada
Dec 2, 2009
#14
  • Dec 2, 2009
  • #14
Heads

To me I think they are very important and worth spending money on. I got TFS High Ports CNC ported to the max from Rick at Fox Lake Performance. 2.08 intake 1.65 exhaust. Almost $4000 on heads alone. I figured only buy them once, they are good for 8's if I ever went nuts with the car.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
138
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
A
Old Holley head identification???
  • Ar15cobra
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
191
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
758
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
478
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
L
93 2.3L 5 speed manual with los of power
  • leadfoot67217
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
0
Views
198
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jan 27, 2026
leadfoot67217
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?