• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

horsepower guesstimate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MustangGlx
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2005

MustangGlx

New Member
Apr 2, 2003
147
0
0
Connecticut
Apr 15, 2005
#1
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #1
can anyone give me a rough estimate on the kind of power ill be making with my set up?
302
Hi-Po 289 heads, ported and poished ( my compression ratio is around 11:1)
comp cams magnum cam mechanical lifter .501 lift 230 duration at .050
edlebrock performer intake manifold
holly 650 duel feed 4bbl 2 inch carb spacer
80gph mechanical fual pump
msd 6a ignition and blaster II coil
heddman torque step headers
very unrestrictive 2.25 inch dual side exit exhaust

thanks
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Apr 15, 2005
#2
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #2
No.......... First of all, this is the Talk forum and you need to go to Tech. Second, the Performer intake is pretty much just a stock replacement and you need to step up to a RPM Air Gap at least. Next, your heads would be holding you back from making much over 250 h.p., and last but not least, you need to go to a dyno to get your timing and fuel dialed in. That alone could gain 100h.p.
 

MustangGlx

New Member
Apr 2, 2003
147
0
0
Connecticut
Apr 16, 2005
#3
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #3
mustangdave said:
Next, your heads would be holding you back from making much over 250 h.p.
Click to expand...

i dont see how considering there off a 271 horse 289 and they've been improved.. ?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Apr 16, 2005
#4
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #4
he's right about the intake for sure, you could get a ford racing intake, the one that is a copy of the old shelby intakes (can't remember the number) as that is about the best dual plane you can get for a small ford, or the rpm air gap is a good choice too. the heads are definitely going to hold you back some as well, but they aren't horrible, they aren't great either though. i'd say you're looking at about 275-300 at the flywheel, which will be about 240-250 at the rear wheels.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Apr 16, 2005
#5
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #5
bnickel's right. The intake is/was known as the F4B and is a copy of the old Shelby dual-plane, very effective part. I wouldn't get too jacked up over the 271hp hi-po heads. All early small block heads are identical, with the exception of the screw-in studs that the hi-po's had and they are all pretty lame compared to off the rack heads of today. Ported heads are only as good as the guy porting them, so you may want to consider that. Personally, I'd venture a guess of about 250 or so horses, give or take. I seriously doubt ANY small block Ford ever got 271 stock, regardless of the factory ratings or any urban legends. I remember when Hot Rod magazine did a shootout between a 271 horse '65 fastback, a '70 Boss 302 (290hp) and a 225 horse '89 GT 5.0, it wasn't even close between the vintage cars and the '89. But then wouldn't you expect Ford to have learned a thing or two since '65?
 

MustangGlx

New Member
Apr 2, 2003
147
0
0
Connecticut
Apr 18, 2005
#6
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #6
i stubled into a possible deal on a wiend xcelrator, how are they? better than the edelbrock?
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Apr 18, 2005
#7
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #7
I don't have experience with the xcelerator, but I know that they are awesome intakes. If they had it for a 351 Windsor i would get it. You simply can't beat single plane intakes. I have heard that they are the top intakes for 289-302's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Fox Body Ready 393 Stroker with Conversion Headers and Pan
  • kikz19
  • Dec 5, 2011
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
0
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Dec 5, 2011
kikz19
  • Locked
SOLD 1983 Mustang Coupe - Street-Legal, Open-Track, NASA American Iron series
  • WesStang
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
12
Views
62K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 10, 2014
WesStang
R
  • Locked
66 Mustang Fastback Pro Touring/Street
  • raw23062
  • Sep 21, 2010
  • Classic Mustangs For Sale
Replies
10
Views
9K
Classic Mustangs For Sale Jun 27, 2011
raw23062
R
Recommend me a camshaft
  • SadbutTrue
  • Apr 28, 2008
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
19K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 11, 2008
D.Hearne
D
T
Estimate my 347's HP
  • thekid760
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 17, 2007
thekid760
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?