• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

How accurate are our factory tachs??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlie Allen
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2008
C

Charlie Allen

15 Year Member
Jan 7, 2008
60
0
7
Dec 11, 2008
#1
  • Dec 11, 2008
  • #1
Anyone have a good aftermarket tach and a working OEM tach in their car? How close are they?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 11, 2008
#2
  • Dec 11, 2008
  • #2
At low rpm they seem to be decently accurate. I have found them to about 400 rpm off on average at the top end. Pretty inaccurate I would say.

Kurt
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 11, 2008
#3
  • Dec 11, 2008
  • #3
Yes ... I'd say Kurt has it about summed up

Over the years I've been hanging around on these Stang forums
I've seen this Q come up several times

I've seen a few say their tach was off as much as 600 to 800 rpm

Some have said only 100 to 150 rpm

Yea ... an average of 300 to 400 sounds about right to me

Almost forgot ... most have said they read ... too high

Datalogging has shown mine to be off by a bit less than 200 rpm

Grady
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Dec 12, 2008
#4
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #4
Would a shift light be dead on?
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Dec 12, 2008
#5
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #5
revhead347 said:
At low rpm they seem to be decently accurate. I have found them to about 400 rpm off on average at the top end. Pretty inaccurate I would say.

Kurt
Click to expand...


My exp aswell
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Dec 12, 2008
#6
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #6
I'm sure it varies. In my 95, the Tweecer always read the same as the dash, but they might be connected, I'm not sure. Our 93 GT had a tach when we bought it and it reads withing 100 rpm or so of the dash.
 

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Dec 12, 2008
#7
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #7
i know mine is quite a bit of up high
at 5400 it reads 6000
(i compared it to a digital timing light)

would a shift light actually be accurate???
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Dec 12, 2008
#8
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #8
I still shift via the stock tach and I haven't noticed any measurable difference between it and my datalogs.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Dec 12, 2008
#9
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #9
Yeah and I would HOPE that the rpm's read from the computer would be accurate since ALL the timing and fuel curves are based on load and rpm.
 

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Dec 12, 2008
#10
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #10
lol

true!!!

although knowing ford i wouldnt be surprised if that was off too
 
M

moostangvert

New Member
Dec 3, 2008
47
0
0
Dec 12, 2008
#11
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #11
Killercanary said:
I still shift via the stock tach and I haven't noticed any measurable difference between it and my datalogs.
Click to expand...

same here.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Dec 12, 2008
#12
  • Dec 12, 2008
  • #12
I think the inaccuracy lies in the gauge itself. The EEC is nuts-on with its reading - it has to be for the minute (tiny, not a reference to time) changes it makes.

In my experience, the tachs tend to be off by a percentage. So they read off a couple hundred RPM at 3K and perhaps 400 RPM off at redline (as a random example).

I've noted my fox's tach to be off by 200 RPM at 3K RPM. The tach on the 94 is off by 100 RPM or so at 3K (I can't interpolate the stock tach further). I'm sure everyones' mileage varies on how far off they are.

Paul's method has always sat fine with me. Consistency is key.
 
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Dec 14, 2008
#13
  • Dec 14, 2008
  • #13
My old 94 vert was dead on perfect.
My current 94 coupe is 300 - 400 rpm off throughout the whole rev range.
but previous owner has put a white face guage setup on and might have messed up the needle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Speedo and tach dead
  • Davinrobinson1
  • Jul 19, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
14
Views
134
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 11:54 AM
fasterthangas
F
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
266
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
D
Picked up Calypso 92 LX hatchback
  • Dakar09
  • May 18, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
12
Views
290
The Welcome Wagon May 21, 2026
Dakar09
D
Engine Defective PIP sensor ?
  • bock
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
Mindseye007
Electrical Innovate PSB-1 is DOA? Am I an idiot? All plausable. Please Help
  • Dontknowchit
  • Apr 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
470
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 26, 2025
Dontknowchit
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?