• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

how can i raise redline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DerekStangGT
  • Start date Start date Jun 3, 2008
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Jun 3, 2008
#1
  • Jun 3, 2008
  • #1
if i were to rebuild my 4.6, how would i make it safely rev higher? i like the idea of redlining at 7k like the cobras. could i just buy a forged rotating assembly that can handle the higher RPMS? of course new valve springs and cams are needed. also, i would have to retune the factory computer to make the electronic cutoff higher than the stock 6025 redline, right? is all this possible? anyone done it?
 
H

H0SS302

New Member
Feb 5, 2006
34
0
0
Jun 3, 2008
#2
  • Jun 3, 2008
  • #2
very easy to raise redline. u will need to invest in some better internals, and also u will need to mods to GIVE U ENOUGH POWER TO USE THE EXTRA REV.

i dont know what ur reasoning is for wanting to redline higher; is it so u can think your car is cooler, or is it to serve a purpose like needing the extra tach to not redline at the end of the 1320?
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Jun 3, 2008
#3
  • Jun 3, 2008
  • #3
H0SS302 said:
very easy to raise redline. u will need to invest in some better internals, and also u will need to mods to GIVE U ENOUGH POWER TO USE THE EXTRA REV.

i dont know what ur reasoning is for wanting to redline higher; is it so u can think your car is cooler, or is it to serve a purpose like needing the extra tach to not redline at the end of the 1320?
Click to expand...

common sense tells me its because he wants more power....
 

TorqueMonster88

Member
Oct 10, 2006
46
0
6
Jun 3, 2008
#4
  • Jun 3, 2008
  • #4
Who doesn't think a 7k 4.6 is cool?.....although the idea of shelling out the green to rev to 7k is a bit......wasteful.........i have asked this similar question on here before....but realized its too much money and can be spent on other things....like?......A KB
 
H

H0SS302

New Member
Feb 5, 2006
34
0
0
Jun 3, 2008
#5
  • Jun 3, 2008
  • #5
deftsound said:
common sense tells me its because he wants more power....
Click to expand...

u would be surprised.... there are a lot of ppl who would like to be like vtak yo and rev higher...
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Jun 3, 2008
#6
  • Jun 3, 2008
  • #6
If you want to shift at 7K you need to move the factory HP peak which is at 5k to some where's around 6200-6500 RPM. We can start with forged rotating assemble, new cams, port heads, reworked intake and exhaust systems.
 

mixedbreed02gt

Banned
Oct 6, 2007
0
0
0
Nashville, TN
Jun 3, 2008
#7
  • Jun 3, 2008
  • #7
or he can just get a tuner/programmer and move the rev limiter up higher...but his engine might not last too long.
 

Black_02_GT

Member
Mar 2, 2008
0
0
16
Mississippi
Jun 4, 2008
#8
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #8
H0SS302 said:
u would be surprised.... there are a lot of ppl who would like to be like vtak yo and rev higher...
Click to expand...

you'd be suprised if you read other posts you'd know he's planning on building a new motor and would like to raise his rev limiter... dont be a n00b and start knocking people.
 
C

CENTENNIALSTANG

Member
Apr 15, 2005
0
0
16
Houston
Jun 4, 2008
#9
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #9
Stan Weiss said:
If you want to shift at 7K you need to move the factory HP peak which is at 5k to some where's around 6200-6500 RPM. We can start with forged rotating assemble, new cams, port heads, reworked intake and exhaust systems.
Click to expand...

with FI you always want to be in the powerband, ,mr stan weiss isnt I beam rods aimed at higher reving engines
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Jun 4, 2008
#10
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #10
you will need some good cams and then some good valve springs. also a good set of heads to be able to flow enough air at those rpms. if you are going to run some sort of power adder at those rpms i would recommend some forged internals. at higher rpms like that you are putting more stress on the motor.


and if you are going to put a power adder on that thing to rev it to 7k get a centri blower or a turbo to do that. its gonna pull much harder up top.
 
H

H0SS302

New Member
Feb 5, 2006
34
0
0
Jun 4, 2008
#11
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #11
Black_02_GT said:
you'd be suprised if you read other posts you'd know he's planning on building a new motor and would like to raise his rev limiter... dont be a n00b and start knocking people.
Click to expand...

dude iv been around these cars for Some time.. im no noob.. iv read countless posts of ppl saying they want to raise there redline because it was cool.

i answered the guys question, i just had to ask...cause u never know. so take it down a peg turbo.
 

oxfordgt

Member
Apr 30, 2006
288
2
18
Clarksville, TN
Jun 4, 2008
#12
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #12
Bottom line is your not going to make any more power worth the money of raising your rev limiter. You will need a forged shortblock, .600 springs with titanium hats and locks, upgraded followers, upgraded or solid lash adjusters, completely reworked heads (stage 3 patriots wouldnt do it), good blower cams and a supercharger like an F1a or better.

With out all that raising a 2v rev limiter is pointless.

Happy spending.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Jun 4, 2008
#13
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #13
CENTENNIALSTANG said:
with FI you always want to be in the powerband, ,mr stan weiss isnt I beam rods aimed at higher reving engines
Click to expand...

There are companies that make some nice I beam rods. The higher you want to raise the RPM limit the more it costs. It is a contradiction in some ways. You need stronger parts to rev high yet to rev higher and keep the engine together you want the parts to be lighter.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Jun 4, 2008
#14
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #14
oxfordgt said:
Bottom line is your not going to make any more power worth the money of raising your rev limiter. You will need a forged shortblock, .600 springs with titanium hats and locks, upgraded followers, upgraded or solid lash adjusters, completely reworked heads (stage 3 patriots wouldnt do it), good blower cams and a supercharger like an F1a or better.

With out all that raising a 2v rev limiter is pointless.

Happy spending.
Click to expand...

So what you are saying is that the 4.6 engine unlike the SBC and 5.0 Ford can not be built to make HP and Rev greater that 7k without a blower?
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jun 4, 2008
#15
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #15
Stan Weiss said:
So what you are saying is that the 4.6 engine unlike the SBC and 5.0 Ford can not be built to make HP and Rev greater that 7k without a blower?
Click to expand...


It definatly can.

Look at the fastest N/A 4.6's at the strip, I garuntee you they spin that high if not higher.

The amount of money it takes to build one is very large though, and not worth it to me.

If you want a motor that will spin 7k all day long go find a STOCK (lol) 4v and swap it over and build an allready more potent motor from there.

Trying to piece together a reasonably priced motor that will actually benefit from 7k RPM isnt going to be feesable IMO.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jun 4, 2008
#16
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #16
I'm curious, what mechanically different about the 4v that keeps it from flying apart compared to the 2v. I'm not talking about airflow or making it worth while, only mechanical parts, like rods, rod bolts, and valve springs. I ask because I honestly don't see why you need exotic parts, like titanium valve springs and solid lifters to turn 7k rpm. Ford did it without solid lifters and they had an extra 2 valves to control....
It's not like 7k is THAT fast. I would think better rods and upgraded valve springs should do it. For reference, on my OHC 2.3, you don't need to go to solid lifters until you are spinning 7500+. Is the crank in the 4v different too?
 

Marks5.0!

Founding Member
Jan 27, 2000
640
2
0
San Antonio, TX
Jun 4, 2008
#17
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #17
bhuff30 said:
I'm curious, what mechanically different about the 4v that keeps it from flying apart compared to the 2v. I'm not talking about airflow or making it worth while, only mechanical parts, like rods, rod bolts, and valve springs. I ask because I honestly don't see why you need exotic parts, like titanium valve springs and solid lifters to turn 7k rpm. Ford did it without solid lifters and they had an extra 2 valves to control....
It's not like 7k is THAT fast. I would think better rods and upgraded valve springs should do it. For reference, on my OHC 2.3, you don't need to go to solid lifters until you are spinning 7500+. Is the crank in the 4v different too?
Click to expand...

yes all the cobras and m5 machs have a forged crank whil ethe auto machs have a cast crank.
as far as the rods and all that stuff go i have no clue as i never compared my stock 4v parts to some stock 2v parts i have laying around.

ill say pulling my 4v up to its current 7700 rpm limiter is fun though

a 2v that revs to 7k and has the cams and everything to support it would be a fun ride.
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Jun 4, 2008
#18
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #18
H0SS302 said:
i dont know what ur reasoning is for wanting to redline higher; is it so u can think your car is cooler, or is it to serve a purpose like needing the extra tach to not redline at the end of the 1320?
Click to expand...
i wanna be the coolest kid on the block
deftsound said:
common sense tells me its because he wants more power....
Click to expand...
bingo
TorqueMonster88 said:
Who doesn't think a 7k 4.6 is cool?.....although the idea of shelling out the green to rev to 7k is a bit......wasteful.........i have asked this similar question on here before....but realized its too much money and can be spent on other things....like?......A KB
Click to expand...
i plan on rebuilding anyway, so while im shelling out the $$ for forged internals anyway, why not raise redline? the way i look at it, one of the downfalls of a standard transmission is that you lose time shifting. so i want to make the most power, and stay in the same gear for as long as possible. i already have the 4.10s to help keep me in the powerband.

Stan Weiss said:
If you want to shift at 7K you need to move the factory HP peak which is at 5k to some where's around 6200-6500 RPM. We can start with forged rotating assemble, new cams, port heads, reworked intake and exhaust systems.
Click to expand...
i was planning on doing all that. although the stage 3 comp cams were the only ones that made power past 6k rpms, but boast an extremely rough idle, which would affect driveability, which i dont want. so maybe a custom grind is in order?
 

oxfordgt

Member
Apr 30, 2006
288
2
18
Clarksville, TN
Jun 4, 2008
#19
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #19
You are not going to make any power at 7000rpms with a NA 2v no matter how much you build it. It can not flow air like a 4v. That is why the 4v has a higher rev limit.

4v and 2v have the same rods and pistons except 03-04 cobra.
 

Black_02_GT

Member
Mar 2, 2008
0
0
16
Mississippi
Jun 4, 2008
#20
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #20
Edit. Done in this thread.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
690
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
330
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
859
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
How Many Runs For A Built C-4
  • 93gtmustang
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
724
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
revhead347
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
926
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?