• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

How Low = Too Low?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SeventyMach1
  • Start date Start date Jan 19, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Jan 19, 2006
#1
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #1
Well, I'm looking at a set of springs. My suspension is totally stock & has alot of miles on it. I'm sick & tired of the 4x4 look. These springs lower our cars 1.9" in the front & 1.7" in the rear. Are these good, or is this too much drop? Would I experience any problems? I plan on getting the MM C/C plates .... but what else should I get while I'm doing it?


BTW, I have 10.5" wheels (w/315's) out back. Think I'd run into any problems there?
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Jan 19, 2006
#2
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #2
I don't think you'd have a problem, that's about what the Eibach Sportlines do, since they say 1.7 to 2.3 inches on their website. The only thing I can think of off hand is maybe wanting to get some offset rack bushings? Not sure if you'll absolutely need them though, since I haven't lowered my car yet, but I'm looking at either the Pro Kit or Sportline springs myself.
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Jan 19, 2006
#3
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #3
To me, the sportlines are too low, and the pro-kit looks just about perfect. I would think that any thing lower than sportlines will look silly. There are a bunch of old threads requesting pics of cars at various drops. Look at those.

But hey, some people like the slammed look. Just not me.
 

ES Stangin

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
132
0
0
Erie, Pa
Jan 19, 2006
#4
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #4
Maximum Motorsports said:
Offset steering rack bushings move the rack far too much on stock K-Members, and make an acceptible situation far worse than if you had done nothing at all.
Click to expand...

If you lower the car around 1.5" then you should get a bumpsteer kit, and some 2x ball joints to somewhat correct the geometry. Can it be done without? Yes.

Read this site Mustang Suspension. It helped me understand a lot more.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jan 19, 2006
#5
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #5
i was dropped about 2". it looked killer, but i would bottom out and scrape on speed bumps all the time. also, they couldn't align it with the factory plates, so my front tires are basically shot. it got old pretty fast.

just 2 days ago i had coil-overs, strange struts and mm c/c plates put in, so now i can adjust the ride height and the stiffness.

as far as getting anything else, i recommend upgrading the struts while you are in there. strange makes 10-way adjustable ones that are cheap compared to all other adjustable struts. i have them and everyone else who has has experience with them loves them.

i doubt you'd have problems with the wide tires.
 

95riosnake

Member
Dec 21, 2003
630
0
17
Pittsburgh, PA
Jan 19, 2006
#6
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #6
GRGT1994 said:
There are a bunch of old threads requesting pics of cars at various drops. Look at those.
Click to expand...

where is that thread anyway, the one that was just recently started? I tried searching for it to add mine, but couldn't find it.

In addition to what others have said...new struts and shocks would be a good idea if you have the funds. They are generally made to work better with the new springs. I cant remember what place sells the kit, but you can get the Mach 1 Tokico shocks and struts for $180 for the set...maybe somebody else can chime in with the place that offers this.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Jan 19, 2006
#7
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #7
i lowered mine with sportlines, and i love the look, i might lower it more in the front, cut a coil off. I NEED new CC plates to get it aligned.
 
R

reject5.0

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
153
0
0
Round Rock, TX
Jan 19, 2006
#8
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #8
I don't think sportlines look too low or "slammed." Any less of a drop and I would be dissapointed IMO. But, the pro-kit does look nice also.
 

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Jan 19, 2006
#9
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #9
i just installed sportlines about 3 weeks ago and couldnt be happier...the stance is pretty awesome, and it handles really well....i also am using MM c/c plates which are very nice pieces.....i REALLY needa get some shocks and struts though..
 

silverstangman

New Member
Mar 26, 2003
413
0
0
Eastern NC
Jan 19, 2006
#10
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #10
BlackVert said:
i was dropped about 2". it looked killer, but i would bottom out and scrape on speed bumps all the time. also, they couldn't align it with the factory plates, so my front tires are basically shot. it got old pretty fast.

just 2 days ago i had coil-overs, strange struts and mm c/c plates put in, so now i can adjust the ride height and the stiffness.

as far as getting anything else, i recommend upgrading the struts while you are in there. strange makes 10-way adjustable ones that are cheap compared to all other adjustable struts. i have them and everyone else who has has experience with them loves them.

i doubt you'd have problems with the wide tires.
Click to expand...

i went basically the same route as him. i got strange coil-over kit with hypercoil springs and strange struts up front with mm c/c plates. in the rear i cut a coil off the spring and put in strange shocks with my new control arms.
to me it has the perfect stance really raked and it looks awesome. i probably dropped the front about 2" and the back about an inch. but i am more concerned with drag racing than ride quality really, it's a little choppy especially with my l/t's you have to be careful or they scrape. and my gt isn't my dd so i'm not too worried about bottoming out and all. so if i was you i would go with the 1 1/2" drop to be safe. just my 2cents
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jan 19, 2006
#11
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #11
I have Eibach's too and I need CC plates. They cost a bit though.

For those of us not in the know, what is better for CC plates - steel or alum? (I know I could search, but there is probably bad info out there and it would take reading 500 threads to get a consensus). The info might help others reading this thread anyhow.......
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jan 19, 2006
#12
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #12
HISSIN50 said:
I have Eibach's too and I need CC plates. They cost a bit though.

For those of us not in the know, what is better for CC plates - steel or alum? (I know I could search, but there is probably bad info out there and it would take reading 500 threads to get a consensus). The info might help others reading this thread anyhow.......
Click to expand...
steel - aluminum cc plates can bend
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jan 19, 2006
#13
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #13
BlackVert said:
steel - aluminum cc plates can bend
Click to expand...
Thank you sir.

I kinda had a feeling about that (JRichker had posted the same info before, but I was not sure what advantage alum might have - otherwise why offer it?). Perhaps the alum units are cheaper or something.

Thanks again - I will hunt for steel units.
 

ES Stangin

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
132
0
0
Erie, Pa
Jan 19, 2006
#14
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #14
HISSIN50 said:
Thank you sir.

I kinda had a feeling about that (JRichker had posted the same info before, but I was not sure what advantage alum might have - otherwise why offer it?). Perhaps the alum units are cheaper or something.

Thanks again - I will hunt for steel units.
Click to expand...


Get the MM one's! There were some problems with the spherical bearings wearing out (even with MMs) but they warranty the whole assembly.
 

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Jan 19, 2006
#15
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #15
ES Stangin said:
Get the MM one's! There were some problems with the spherical bearings wearing out (even with MMs) but they warranty the whole assembly.
Click to expand...
i agree 100%...MM plates are made of billet steel which is the strongest plates made...and they dont have spherical bearings like others which wear out...
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Jan 19, 2006
#16
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #16
justin, i would not worry about the rear, but what size tire do you have in front? you may need some additional steering rack travel limiters. 1.9 is really low and will result in unfavorable suspension geometry that will really need a bump steer kit--center drilled rack bushings required. having said that a competitive stang will be no lower than 1.5" in front for stated reasons. what is the spring rates?
 

ES Stangin

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
132
0
0
Erie, Pa
Jan 19, 2006
#17
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #17
stprorolla49 said:
i agree 100%...MM plates are made of billet steel which is the strongest plates made...and they dont have spherical bearings like others which wear out...
Click to expand...


I thought they used the spherical bearings, also?

From their website..
When engineering our Caster/Camber plates, we discovered that the only design which allows the necessary strut top movement is a spherical bearing.
Click to expand...

Either way, its warrantied
 

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Jan 19, 2006
#18
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #18
ES Stangin said:
I thought they used the spherical bearings, also?

From their website..

Either way, its warrantied
Click to expand...
thats what i meant....my bad...i meant to say that others DONT have spherical bearings and teh MM's do...my bad....
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Jan 19, 2006
#19
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #19
I know you were interested in my springs so I'm kinda shooting myself in the foot by saying this , but I would go with the pro-kit or equivilent. If you go with anything lower, I would say the x2 balljoints and a bumpsteer kit are a must. I don't have either and my car bumpsteer's a good bit, especially with the 275's up front.

I've also heard that the pro-kit handles better than the sportlines due to the better geometry. I don't know how well the pro-kit handles, but my car handles awesome with the sportlines.
 
D

DARK-5.0

Founding Member
Feb 20, 2002
724
1
19
Leawood, KS
Jan 19, 2006
#20
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #20
I've had sportlines for about 2 years and have nothing but good things to say about them. The stance is awesome and the handling is speechless over stock. But I am currently going to coil overs, but need to sell my sportlines first. Any one interested, let me know.

Jeremy
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
213
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Still need an Alignment?
  • from6to8
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
268
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 2, 2025
AeroCoupe
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
248
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
191
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?