How many 87-93 5.0 guys/gals using twEECer?

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Just curious to see how many guys/gals are using a TwEECer on a fox 93. I am going to get a TwEECer R/T and a LC-1 WB o2 in a week or so, and am going to be using it on my NA 91 5.0 motor. So I have been spending the past week or so reading anything and everything I can find about tuning with a TwEECer, learning about MAF tables, injector timing, ect ect. I even already downloaded CalEdit and CalCon, just to get a "hands on" feel. I haven't changed any settings, I am just trying to get a better understanding of the terms and tables available.

Most of the info I am finding on the net for a 5.0 is on 94-95 5.0s. I know the theories are the same, and most of the tables I will be editing are the same...but there is a lot of info on fans and other EEC-V stuff that does not pertain to the EEC-IV, fox, 5.0.

Basically I was wondering if there even was a lot of NA Fox people using a TwEECer, and how much of the basics are different between the two.
 
Chime, chime.



There is a link in my sig to my site.
No one has complained about the tech accuracy, yet :eek: .



Fett-
I think I talked to you on another thread before?

Watch out for the sn95 info.
Their computer uses the Load numbers differently.
There is a major difference when you start getting into the details.

I had a couple of threads in the sn95 5.0 tuning forum here that were pretty confusing, because of these differences.

It sounds like you will plenty ready to dig into the tune when your RT arrives. :nice:
Your on the right path.



jason
 
Yea, I want to say that some of the things I have bookmarked have your name on them.

I did a bunch of searches on here, and a lot on yahoo and whatnot, but most of the yahoo searches bring up SN95 stuff.

I am trying to stay away from the too detailed stuff right now, I need to learn and understand the basics first. MAF table, injector timing, ignition timing. Then as I learn, I will get into it deeper. I don't want to burn myself out with info overload.