• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

How much for an upper and lower Cobra intak? How much power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter impulse001
  • Start date Start date Jan 25, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Jan 26, 2010
#21
  • Jan 26, 2010
  • #21


I knew something happened because I was helping my cousin get one and they said they ran into some "issues" with the original cast and wouldnt be able to sell him one for around 4-5 months. Obviously this would have been the time to have China start making them. Makes sense now. Anywho we found two remaining from the actual Ford casting and had him buy one, but it sure wasnt only $300....
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 26, 2010
#22
  • Jan 26, 2010
  • #22
That's why I rock the Explorer piece.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jan 26, 2010
#23
  • Jan 26, 2010
  • #23
If running this with stock heads, it will rob some low end power and move the powerband higher creating more top end power.

A tmoss ported lower might be a better peice to run with stock heads as the stock 5.0 intake is good at low end torque. The lower is the restriction but porting will take care of that.

If heads are in the future...disregard, but you might be able to pick up a tmoss stock lower and run that until you get heads and perhaps a different upper intake.
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Jan 26, 2010
#24
  • Jan 26, 2010
  • #24
Mustang5L5 said:
If running this with stock heads, it will rob some low end power and move the powerband higher creating more top end power.
Click to expand...

That is a commonly quoted "internet expert" bit of misinformation. A Cobra-equipped stock engine loses nothing down low, but has an increase in both power and torque over a very broad band.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Jan 27, 2010
#25
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #25
wythors said:
That is a commonly quoted "internet expert" bit of misinformation. A Cobra-equipped stock engine loses nothing down low, but has an increase in both power and torque over a very broad band.
Click to expand...

That was my experience with my cobra intake.
 
P

Pratice

New Member
Jan 17, 2010
48
0
0
NC
Jan 27, 2010
#26
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #26
Hmmm, I have foxlake ported cobra lower and tmoss ported cobra upper w/ 75mm tb opening I was going to install in case my Systemax killed my lowend..
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Jan 27, 2010
#27
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #27
The dyno sheet on my buddy's car says otherwise, as does Tom Moss.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jan 28, 2010
#28
  • Jan 28, 2010
  • #28
to the OP - if you put on a Cobra with a 55mm Fox MAF, BE SURE to change out the MAF with a 70mm 94-95 MAF and then you can run a 65mm or 70mm TB. The Fox 55mm MAF is a significant bottle neck as is the stock lower. I've never found a GT40/Cobra/Explorer upper that had a smaller TB oppening than 70mm. This will make the restiction the heads and you will pick up a nice hit in power. Loosing low end in the swap depends somewhat on the cam, but I have dyno tests that show a stock or ported HO intake making more torque/power than the stock GT40 style intake below 3,800-4,200 rpm. This was before and after tests on the same car/engine. Your results may vary......
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Jan 28, 2010
#29
  • Jan 28, 2010
  • #29
tmoss said:
to the OP - if you put on a Cobra with a 55mm Fox MAF, BE SURE to change out the MAF with a 70mm 94-95 MAF and then you can run a 65mm or 70mm TB. The Fox 55mm MAF is a significant bottle neck as is the stock lower. I've never found a GT40/Cobra/Explorer upper that had a smaller TB oppening than 70mm. This will make the restiction the heads and you will pick up a nice hit in power. Loosing low end in the swap depends somewhat on the cam, but I have dyno tests that show a stock or ported HO intake making more torque/power than the stock GT40 style intake below 3,800-4,200 rpm. This was before and after tests on the same car/engine. Your results may vary......
Click to expand...

Really? I know when I got mine it was smaller than 70mm and we had to port match it... Have you done an actual 93 cobra from a 93? I was told mine was an original and bought it on this premise, however, this was also 7 years ago...
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 28, 2010
#30
  • Jan 28, 2010
  • #30
My Exploder had a 69.99999mm opening. A couple minutes with a grinder to clean up the casting and my 70mm EGR spacer matched up nicely.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Jan 28, 2010
#31
  • Jan 28, 2010
  • #31
NikwoaC said:
My Exploder had a 69.99999mm opening. A couple minutes with a grinder to clean up the casting and my 70mm EGR spacer matched up nicely.
Click to expand...

I see, good to know. I actually got rid of my EGR so I didnt have that to use as point of reference..
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
For Sale 03 Redfire Cobra Convertible
  • FastFox5oh
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
89
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jul 14, 2026
FastFox5oh
F
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
310
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Lost my Foxbody
  • Mhalc1
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
760
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
Mhalc1
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
751
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?