• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How much HP is an Electric Fan worth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kdubslugga
  • Start date Start date Dec 15, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Dec 15, 2004
#1
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #1
Im going crazy this winter not driving my car, and it hasnt even been 2 months yet! Im enjoying adding stuff to my car this winter, lets me spend some time with her. Anyways, ive got about 200 bucks to spend, and i know i want either Lower Control Arms or a Flex A lite Electric Fan. My question is how much HP are these good for, i know they advertise like 15+ but i know thats not true. Also which mod would benifet me more at the strip? If it helps my winter project this year is 4.10s, ET Streets, C/C Plates, Lowering Springs.
 

saniutza

New Member
Oct 28, 2003
147
0
0
born in Transylvania, Romania...live in Lusby,MD
Dec 15, 2004
#2
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #2
Kdubslugga said:
Im going crazy this winter not driving my car, and it hasnt even been 2 months yet! Im enjoying adding stuff to my car this winter, lets me spend some time with her. Anyways, ive got about 200 bucks to spend, and i know i want either Lower Control Arms or a Flex A lite Electric Fan. My question is how much HP are these good for, i know they advertise like 15+ but i know thats not true. Also which mod would benifet me more at the strip? If it helps my winter project this year is 4.10s, ET Streets, C/C Plates, Lowering Springs.
Click to expand...

yes it is true about 15hp... to the strip probably contol arms: better handling...

btw with an electric fan you'll hve to upgrade to a 3g alternator at least 100-130amps new wiring and some other tsuff to control the fan...

" if it's a fox body, and has the stock 65A alternator - you're gonna need to upgrade the alternator. At least 95A, most folks go with a 130A. "-Michael Yount
 

BlackDrop50

Founding Member
Jul 14, 2002
217
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Dec 15, 2004
#3
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #3
Go with control arms for sure. They help traction greatly and I would personally take them over an electric fan, even though I have both.


Get the fan later!
 

Funanin

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2001
356
0
0
Horsham, Pennsylvania
Dec 15, 2004
#4
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #4
yea get the fan later, if u are gettin gears and cc plates and such u are going to need something to keep those tires on the ground
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Dec 15, 2004
#5
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #5
The only reason i wanted an Electric fan was because my fan shroud is looking like crap its cracked and discolored. But if i have to get a new alt. ill just get some control arms
 
N

notchman90

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
87
0
0
long isle, ny
Dec 15, 2004
#6
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #6
I didnt notcie any difference when i put on elctric fans in terms of hp.
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Dec 15, 2004
#7
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #7
notchman90 said:
I didnt notcie any difference when i put on elctric fans in terms of hp.
Click to expand...
same here, maybe revs a bit easier but even then i doubt it.
 
J

jocko

Member
Oct 1, 2003
62
0
6
miami fl
Dec 15, 2004
#8
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #8
i run my black magic fan with the stock alternator and no problems,and the idiot that owned the car before me had the previous fan wired on ignition without a temp control so fan was always on as long as ignition was on and i never had a problem.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Dec 15, 2004
#9
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #9
You can't really loose either way. What bothers you the most and/or what do you want more? More power or more controll?

I ran the Black Magic for almost a year with the stock alternator and pullies, no issues but the original alt did go out eventually, probally would have anyways. The 3G is one of those upgrades that should be done anyways. An electric fan would definatly free up a lot of rotational weight and drag, so it would be a good mod. The Controll Arms make a big difference in handling, not just in corners but on takeoff as well. You really should do upper's and lowers at the same time IMO.

I don't see subframe connectors in your sig? If you don't have them, forget the fan and LCA's and get the subframes done first.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Dec 15, 2004
#10
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #10
90mustangGT said:
I don't see subframe connectors in your sig? If you don't have them, forget the fan and LCA's and get the subframes done first.
Click to expand...

I second that. Subframes are more important than the control arms at this point; ideally you'd do both the subframes and control arms, but if you only have money for one; get the subframes.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Dec 15, 2004
#11
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #11
saniutza said:
" if it's a fox body, and has the stock 65A alternator - you're gonna need to upgrade the alternator. At least 95A, most folks go with a 130A. "-Michael Yount
Click to expand...
i would add, in regard to what Michael said (Michael, if i mess this up, please correct me): with a variable controller like a www.DcControl.com
the stress on the charging system is less. i would venture to say that if one ran one of those units on a 95 amp alt, the system would run like it had a higher output alt (like a 130 amp) due to the lack of 'all or nothing' fan performance.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Dec 15, 2004
#12
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #12
Let's not forget that adding an electric fan puts a bigger draw on the electrical system.

bigger loads on the alt mean the pulley is harder to turn. And that means you suck up a bit of HP to turn the alt pulley.

So say the fan gives you 15HP, but running it costs you 5HP due the alt. You get 10HP from the mod. See where i am going with this?

This is why i have a switch to shut my fan off when i make a run. Electrical draw increases alternator load.

Of course, they you get the ricer who reads this and shuts his headlights off at night when racing because he thinks it gives him 10HP. You laugh, but i met a kid that did that.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Dec 15, 2004
#13
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #13
Let's not forget that adding an electric fan puts a bigger draw on the electrical system.

bigger loads on the alt mean the pulley is harder to turn. And that means you suck up a bit of HP to turn the alt pulley.

So say the fan gives you 15HP, but running it costs you 5HP due the alt. You get 10HP from the mod. See where i am going with this?

This is why i have a switch to shut my fan off when i make a run. Electrical draw increases alternator load.

Of course, they you get the ricer who reads this and shuts his headlights off at night when racing because he thinks it gives him 10HP. You laugh, but i met a kid that did that.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Dec 15, 2004
#14
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #14
Mike, interesting. i do not have the education you do (not in engineering atleast), but i once did some calcs and the additional alt draw was a fraction of one HP. did i screw up the calcs?
 
J

jerry beach

Founding Member
May 20, 2002
2,671
0
46
Ocala,FL
Dec 15, 2004
#15
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #15
HISSIN50 said:
Mike, interesting. i do not have the education you do (not in engineering atleast), but i once did some calcs and the additional alt draw was a fraction of one HP. did i screw up the calcs?
Click to expand...

I made two passes back to back at the local strip. One with the fan on, and one with it off. Times were so close it wasnt funny. I will go out on a limb and say there is no difference in the real world. The alt takes almost nothing to run. This has been argued many times. The elec. fan frees some noticable HP. What convinced me was taking the stock fan off and driving it. I did this before I installed the elec. fan. Just dont go far. It felt to me like the difference between a/c on and a/c off. They do tax your electrical system though.

I agree 100% with the subframes, they should be a first mod. I will get some real soon.
 
M

MatthewP

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
355
0
0
Calgary, Alberta
Dec 15, 2004
#16
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #16
I've dyno tested an electric fan vs. the stock clutch type fan on my '90 coupe. The car has underdrive pullies and showed a 5 HP gain at the tires on a Mustang dyno with the electric fan. This is a little less than 7 HP at the flywheel.

If you don't have subframes, get them. If you do, get the lower control arms, but reinforce your torque boxes in conjunction with the control arm installation.

Good luck.

-Matthew
 
B

baskin

Member
Nov 1, 2003
152
0
17
Dec 15, 2004
#17
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #17
An m8, even if it’s running full speed draws 35A @ 13V, that would be 455W. An alternator , even at full load is 50% efficient, so the worst case hp draw would be (455*2) / 746, which is 1.2 Hp.

The alternator is nearly always running at less than full load and the m8 rarely runs full speed with a decent controller, so I’d say realistically that the drag would be about ½ hp

If you’re generating any real hp, you’re better off forcing the fan to full speed as soon as you come off the line since you’ll be generating more heat than the system will dissipate.

As far as hp draw of the fan, it’s entirely dependant on rpm and is approximately 15* (rpm /5000)^3

7000 : 41 HP
6000 : 26 HP
5000 : 15 HP
4000 : 7.7 HP
3000 : 3.2 HP
2000 : 0.96 HP
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Dec 16, 2004
#18
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #18
HISSIN50 said:
Mike, interesting. i do not have the education you do (not in engineering atleast), but i once did some calcs and the additional alt draw was a fraction of one HP. did i screw up the calcs?
Click to expand...

Yeah, i did some calcs later on the night i posted that and found it was maybe 0.75HP-1.0HP according to the numbers i used. Nothing to really worry about.

But i was just tossing that fact out there.

Interesting to see it takes less HP to create the electric energy to power a motor to turn the fan than it does to have the engine turn the fan on it's own.
 
B

baskin

Member
Nov 1, 2003
152
0
17
Dec 16, 2004
#19
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #19
It doesn't take less power. If you extrapolate the rpm numbers down to 1700, a mechanical fan uses the same hp that an m8 consumes byway of the alternator but the cfm equates to about 6800 cfm vs 4800 (given that the blade diameter is the same and there is no clutch). The benefit of an e-fan is that the fan rpms are not tied to the engine rpms.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Dec 16, 2004
#20
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #20
They have an article this month in 5.0Mustang&super fords,,A Chicane Sport Tunings Radiator and Fan Assembly.Aluminum radiator and dual fans!!It looks extremely easy to put in.Its the same dimensions as the stock one.The factory clamp downs hold it on.It works on 93 and earlier foxes!! But its a little pricey!!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved Got Too Hot!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
597
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2025
PonyGTrider
Y
2004 Roush - Dome Lights and radio not working
  • Yurei
  • Nov 10, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
404
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
squeak93
Engine OG “Quickie Cooler” Fan/WP Drive
  • 90trunk
  • Apr 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
902
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 5, 2024
90trunk
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
643
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
278
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?