• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How slow are these times?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTO Jimmy
  • Start date Start date Mar 20, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Mar 23, 2009
#21
  • Mar 23, 2009
  • #21
I highly doubt it is the TPS. If you are even worried, remove the air tubing and have someone step on the throttle and see if it goes near 90 degrees.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Mar 24, 2009
#22
  • Mar 24, 2009
  • #22
The AOD is killing you. Swap in a T5 and go. You also need to get your 60ft times down from 2.3 to around 1.8-2.0 to see an improvment in your E/T's and MPH.
 

KamiKaziDK

Member
May 16, 2005
555
0
17
Mesa, Az
Mar 24, 2009
#23
  • Mar 24, 2009
  • #23
These times are bad cause the shift point is way out of place, it's not the aod itself causing bad times, get the TV cable adjusted correctly and install a shift kit, imo
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Mar 24, 2009
#24
  • Mar 24, 2009
  • #24
wow...tv cable is definitely not adjusted correctly. even with it not adjusted correctly, i bet just doing a 1d1 shuffle would put you low 15's, maybe even high 14's. i didn't really see a good explanation on how to do it above so i'll tell you.

pull it all the way down to first. smash throttle, when it's about to shift, push it up into D and then immediately pull it back down into first. it'll hold out on shifting longer. once you reach the top of second gear which should be around 4800-5k, put it back up into D for third.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,251
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Mar 25, 2009
#25
  • Mar 25, 2009
  • #25
Speeds8erM-1 said:
Those actually arent bad times for the mods really, for an AOD car anyway.
Click to expand...


Yes they are.

My '88 AOD car went 14.7 @ 93MPH bone stock with 2.73's. This was leaving it in Drive too.


89MPH trap speed is way too low. It suggests you are losing HP somewhere. However, shifting at 3000RPM is way too low. Your TV cable prob needs to be adjusted. Try the 1-D-1 shuffler and see if you can get your trap MPH up around 91-94MPH. That would be a better indicator if the car is making the power it should.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Mar 25, 2009
#26
  • Mar 25, 2009
  • #26
Mustang5L5 said:
Yes they are.

My '88 AOD car went 14.7 @ 93MPH bone stock with 2.73's. This was leaving it in Drive too.


89MPH trap speed is way too low. It suggests you are losing HP somewhere. However, shifting at 3000RPM is way too low. Your TV cable prob needs to be adjusted. Try the 1-D-1 shuffler and see if you can get your trap MPH up around 91-94MPH. That would be a better indicator if the car is making the power it should.
Click to expand...

WTF! I ran I 14.2 with my 5speed and some basic mods at 95mph.
 

KamiKaziDK

Member
May 16, 2005
555
0
17
Mesa, Az
Mar 25, 2009
#27
  • Mar 25, 2009
  • #27
7upstang91 said:
WTF! I ran I 14.2 with my 5speed and some basic mods at 95mph.
Click to expand...

Shift your T5 at 3800 RPMs and see what you run
 

lazy_stang

New Member
Mar 22, 2009
53
0
0
Mar 25, 2009
#28
  • Mar 25, 2009
  • #28
i ran 15.51 @ 89mph in my bone stock 03 cavalier 5spd lol
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 26, 2009
#29
  • Mar 26, 2009
  • #29
GTO Jimmy said:
Took the stang to the track tonight, was definately slow LOL.
It is an 89 LX with an AOD, has Flowmaster dumps, ford racing wires, msd coil and distributer cap, timing bumped to 14degrees and a K&N cone filter. I know not very many mods but I pretty much just got the car.

Anyway the two runs I made looked like this:

Run 1
60ft- 2.37
330ft- 6.63
1/8th et- 10.16
1/8th mph- 69.58
1/4 et- 15.76
1/4 mph- 87.14

Run 2
60ft- 2.35
330ft- 6.62
1/8th et- 10.15
1/8th mph- 69.44
1/4 et- 15.76
1/4 mph- 86.97

Should the car be faster than this?
Click to expand...


Well, even with a stock car you should be able to get your 60 foot times down to at least a 2.0, even on street tires...just takes a lot of practice. That alone will get your time down a lot. Then, are you doing the 1-2-1 AOD shuffle? This is where, when it's time to shift into 2nd, you slip it into second and immediately back into 1st..this will shift you into 2nd but it won't automatically shift into 3rd/OD on its own until you shift back into 2nd. It's a little hard on the trany but that'll really improve your times. I'd say being a stockish AOD, high 14s are what you can expect.
 

KamiKaziDK

Member
May 16, 2005
555
0
17
Mesa, Az
Mar 26, 2009
#30
  • Mar 26, 2009
  • #30
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Well, even with a stock car you should be able to get your 60 foot times down to at least a 2.0, even on street tires...just takes a lot of practice. That alone will get your time down a lot. Then, are you doing the 1-2-1 AOD shuffle? This is where, when it's time to shift into 2nd, you slip it into second and immediately back into 1st..this will shift you into 2nd but it won't automatically shift into 3rd/OD on its own until you shift back into 2nd. It's a little hard on the trany but that'll really improve your times. I'd say being a stockish AOD, high 14s are what you can expect.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say a 2.0 60ft with a stock engine, aod and 2.73s unless sticky tires are involved. He shouldn't be almost 2.4 though. 2.2 is where he should be though, which in 60 ft, is a huge difference, a 2.1x with a good track that has some vht down is possible though.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Mar 26, 2009
#31
  • Mar 26, 2009
  • #31
It is not the 60 ft. It is not the AOD. It is not normal.

The MPH is much lower than it should be. That shift RPM is not normal.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
1/8th Mile Time?
  • 93lx308
  • Jan 12, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2018
RangerJoe
ET Breakdown
  • RangerJoe
  • May 18, 2011
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 21, 2011
85_SS_302_Coupe
D
2003 Roush Running slight rough, and really slow 1/4 times
  • Devcon
  • Aug 27, 2011
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 1, 2011
Maxpowers
dipped into the 9's!!!!! (1000ft)
  • Stumbaugh
  • Nov 27, 2010
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 30, 2010
sneaky98gt
Y
Took my 86 to the track
  • YawnY
  • Jul 19, 2010
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
836
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 20, 2010
YawnY
Y
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?