• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

How To Get 500+ HP Out Of 4.6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangman9812
  • Start date Start date Jul 22, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Jul 24, 2006
#21
  • Jul 24, 2006
  • #21
centri of your choice and a shot of the happy stuff and your there.
 

40th GT

New Member
Apr 7, 2004
916
0
0
Lawrenceville, GA
Dec 23, 2006
#22
  • Dec 23, 2006
  • #22
White Stang said:
Im making over 500 to the wheels forged internals, boost and tune for sure. Click my sig for what I did to get there.
Click to expand...

*old thread revival*

how much boost is needed to get 500+rwhp?
 
T

thomas91169

I'd donkey punch my sister.
Aug 19, 2005
0
0
0
Modesto, CA
Dec 23, 2006
#23
  • Dec 23, 2006
  • #23
it all depends on what else the car has. If youre trying to get there with boost alone, itll take quite a bit. If you have support like cams/heads that help the overall scope of things, it will take less.

Remember, you will also need a fuel system capible of meeting the demands of that much airflow.
 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Dec 23, 2006
#24
  • Dec 23, 2006
  • #24
T-70 turbo
Check my sig...
I have a stock motor.
Good luck

remember, boost doesn't = power
CFM does. (Volume of air)
I had a v-2 sq running 10 psi. Made 402RWHP and 386RWTQ
I now have a T-70 turbo @ 10 psi. Making 468RWHP and 555RWTQ
 
T

thomas91169

I'd donkey punch my sister.
Aug 19, 2005
0
0
0
Modesto, CA
Dec 23, 2006
#25
  • Dec 23, 2006
  • #25
Rickey_Bobby said:
remember, boost doesn't = power
CFM does. (Volume of air)
Click to expand...

THANK YOU!

Airflow is what makes the power, PSI is just how much the source has to push to get it there.
 

blacksheep-1

Member
Oct 21, 2006
322
4
18
Dec 23, 2006
#26
  • Dec 23, 2006
  • #26
FWIW, I was in Orlando at Corvette masters dyno. 2 buds were there as well. They dyno'd both cars.
#1 04 Cobra w/ pulley, X pipe and a chip= 474rwhp
#2 04 Cobra w/pulley, X pipe,chip, longtubes = 520 rwhp
Neither engine had been apart at all, not even the heads (I know both cars). Both are driven on a regular basis. So.. if it were me, I would just copy what Ford has already done. I wil say this, spend the extra $$ and have it dyno tuned. BTW, I don't know where you are located, but you might try these guys: www.jmschip.com
 
C

CENTENNIALSTANG

Member
Apr 15, 2005
0
0
16
Houston
Dec 23, 2006
#27
  • Dec 23, 2006
  • #27
Rickey_Bobby said:
T-70 turbo
Check my sig...
I have a stock motor.
Good luck

remember, boost doesn't = power
CFM does. (Volume of air)
I had a v-2 sq running 10 psi. Made 402RWHP and 386RWTQ
I now have a T-70 turbo @ 10 psi. Making 468RWHP and 555RWTQ
Click to expand...


Hey man i noticed you have the 70mm turbo thats what im getting in march, but anyway how much power you think i can push with 9psi on a fully built 2v motor with turbo cams ported and polished heads. O and my tuner is badd arrss and if you wana give me a guess on how much HP on maybe 20psi (race gas) give it a
shot.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Dec 24, 2006
#28
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #28
Rickey_Bobby said:
T-70 turbo
Check my sig...
I have a stock motor.
Good luck

remember, boost doesn't = power
CFM does. (Volume of air)
I had a v-2 sq running 10 psi. Made 402RWHP and 386RWTQ
I now have a T-70 turbo @ 10 psi. Making 468RWHP and 555RWTQ
Click to expand...

You making 468 WHP on the stock block?

That's not gonna last too long lol.
 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Dec 24, 2006
#29
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #29
CENTENNIALSTANG, If you have all forged internals your motor should be good to at least 900HP. You will need a fuel system to keep up. 60# injectors, Larger fuel line from tank to fuel rail, and a kick ass pump. Right now I only have 42# injectors, but am currently limited by them. The fuel pump upgrade is where your wallet gets hit. You can put the cobra fuel tank in with the cobra pumps, or get an aeromotive inline pump and convert it to a return style fuel system. Personally, I will be staying returnless as the guy that does my tuning is making over 800RWHP now on an '05 with a returnless system.
http://www.modularmadness.com/gpage2.html

And if you have forged internals, don't stay at 9 psi, it is a waste!!! I would run 1 bar (14.7psi) on 93 octane. You should see close to 600rwhp with that and a conservative tune.

Remember to run a massive intercooler!!!
...like mine:


the98stang said:
You making 468 WHP on the stock block?

That's not gonna last too long lol.
Click to expand...

I'm going on 8 months and 95,000 miles. Although my tranny is making lots of bad noises now. VERY seldom do I rev the motor over 5,500rpm. Might make the differance, might not do anything at all.
 

Attachments

  • steven_001.webp
    21.7 KB · Views: 221

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Dec 24, 2006
#30
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #30
Depends if you're talking at the crank or to the tire. 500 at the crank is easily doable on stock internals much less a built bottom end. I make 423 to the tire on my 125 shot and I spray it at least 3-4 times a week without any problems to my stock bottom end. That is roughly 498 HP at the crank. The 400 RWHP limit to the stock bottom end is a myth. I know of several guys making well over 400 RWHP on stock internals and have been driving the car for a long time.

Seems like alot of people on here are confusing the word block for the entire bottom end. The block itself can EASILY handle 500 RWHP. It's the rotating assembly that has it's limitations once you start to exceed 450 RWHP, namely the pistons and rods.

If you were to decide to use a centrifugal blower, I would without a doubt go with a Pro Charger. The sky is the limit with their head units and their intercoolers are top notch as well. Pro Charger is light years ahead of the competition. The P-1SC is one of the "lightweight" models and will support easily over 850 HP at the crank. Pro Charger has head units that will support over 2,500 HP.

Don't forget to include in the chassis/suspension supporting mods to get that thing to dig.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Dec 24, 2006
#31
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #31
LaserRed01GT said:
The 400 RWHP limit to the stock bottom end is a myth. I know of several guys making well over 400 RWHP on stock internals and have been driving the car for a long time.


If you were to decide to use a centrifugal blower, I would without a doubt go with a Pro Charger. The sky is the limit with their head units and their intercoolers are top notch as well. Pro Charger is light years ahead of the competition. The P-1SC is one of the "lightweight" models and will support easily over 850 HP at the crank. Pro Charger has head units that will support over 2,500 HP.
.
Click to expand...

The "400WHP limit" is not really a "myth". Many people slap on a blower, push 350WHP with a ****ty tune, and blow the motor because they redline it 5-6 times a day. On the other hand, some have been able to push 500, even 600WHP on a very safe tune and the car has lasted years. Generally most people keep it under 450WHP, because as you said, that's when the rods/pistons have problems. It all depends on the tune, the kind of blower, and the type of driver.

As for procharger being "top notch"- I'm not sure about that one. Many of those chargers having leaking problems. On top of that, Prochargers are highly overrated when it comes to CFM/HP rates. I have yet to see a p1sc that has made more than 600WHP, and yet the Vortech s-trim has been proven to make 600WHP- Tim at MPH has done so. Procharger claims the p1SC is capable of 1200 cfm and 825 HP (about 700WHP). That is definetely BS because Vortech s-trims are rated at 1000cfm and 580WHP (according to Vortech). If you want REAL power, you need a novi2000, Vortech T-trim, or KB 2.6 . The P1sc just can't keep up with those blowers. Period.
 
C

CENTENNIALSTANG

Member
Apr 15, 2005
0
0
16
Houston
Dec 24, 2006
#32
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #32
Rickey_Bobby said:
CENTENNIALSTANG, If you have all forged internals your motor should be good to at least 900HP. You will need a fuel system to keep up. 60# injectors, Larger fuel line from tank to fuel rail, and a kick ass pump. Right now I only have 42# injectors, but am currently limited by them. The fuel pump upgrade is where your wallet gets hit. You can put the cobra fuel tank in with the cobra pumps, or get an aeromotive inline pump and convert it to a return style fuel system. Personally, I will be staying returnless as the guy that does my tuning is making over 800RWHP now on an '05 with a returnless system.
http://www.modularmadness.com/gpage2.html

And if you have forged internals, don't stay at 9 psi, it is a waste!!! I would run 1 bar (14.7psi) on 93 octane. You should see close to 600rwhp with that and a conservative tune.

Remember to run a massive intercooler!!!
...like mine:




I'm going on 8 months and 95,000 miles. Although my tranny is making lots of bad noises now. VERY seldom do I rev the motor over 5,500rpm. Might make the differance, might not do anything at all.
Click to expand...


Sweet ride man thanx for the advice!
 

Attachments

  • steven_001.webp
    21.7 KB · Views: 226

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Dec 24, 2006
#33
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #33
My vote is still for turbo. Makes more torque than ANY blower.
Even the KB2.6.
And its $800
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Dec 24, 2006
#34
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #34
Rickey_Bobby said:
My vote is still for turbo. Makes more torque than ANY blower.
Even the KB2.6.
And its $800
Click to expand...

It costs more money, and takes more time to fab. And very few kits are emissions legal or CARB certified.

So if you have tons of cash and time, I guess turbos are the better choice.

It's all personal preference. We could argue all day...
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Dec 24, 2006
#35
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #35
the98stang said:
The "400WHP limit" is not really a "myth". Many people slap on a blower, push 350WHP with a ****ty tune, and blow the motor because they redline it 5-6 times a day. On the other hand, some have been able to push 500, even 600WHP on a very safe tune and the car has lasted years. Generally most people keep it under 450WHP, because as you said, that's when the rods/pistons have problems. It all depends on the tune, the kind of blower, and the type of driver.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is a myth. Just because a few boneheads mistreat their motor or do not have the common sense to get it properly tuned, automatically excludes them from being allowed into statistical reality.

the98stang said:
As for procharger being "top notch"- I'm not sure about that one.
Click to expand...

You see, I am sure. I have been doing blower installs on cars for a long time now. Vortech makes some good products, but they aren't even close to the engineering quality of the ATI stuff....not even close.

the98stang said:
Many of those chargers having leaking problems. On top of that, Prochargers are highly overrated when it comes to CFM/HP rates. I have yet to see a p1sc that has made more than 600WHP, and yet the Vortech s-trim has been proven to make 600WHP- Tim at MPH has done so. Procharger claims the p1SC is capable of 1200 cfm and 825 HP (about 700WHP). That is definetely BS because Vortech s-trims are rated at 1000cfm and 580WHP (according to Vortech). If you want REAL power, you need a novi2000, Vortech T-trim, or KB 2.6 . The P1sc just can't keep up with those blowers. Period.
Click to expand...

ATI had a very limted batch of bad compressor housing seals. The problem was instantly realized and has long since been remedied, and ATI made good on all the customer's head units. EVERY parts manufacturer is going to have a small problem every once in a while, it's unavoidable.

ATI overrated claims??? You obviously have ATI confused with Vortech. ATI sued Vortech a while back in '99 because ATI flat out busted Vortech making outrageously overstated claims as to power increases and "claimed" duarability and performance of their kits. Vortech was also releasing false information that was vastly understating the performance, HP gains, and durability of the ATI products. Then ATI called out Vortech to some head-to-head testing and of course Vortech pussed out and declined. And needless to say, ATI won their lawsuit.

http://www.procharger.com/lawsuit.html

I recently helped tune a 1996 Impala with a 383" LT4 w/ a P-1SC. It made 734 RWHP after all was said and done. And that was through a 4L80E and a 12 Bolt. So that is not enough for you? Step up to the D-1SC...850 RWHP no problem. Still not enough for you? Ok, how about the D-3R....1500 RWHP easy. Still not enough? How about the F-3R or F-4R....2000+ RWHP.

When I was at the PRI show in 2003 promoting my chassis business, Vortech announced that their latest top of the line race blower would be able to support up to 2,000 HP. A full two years later once they were able to even produce a head unit to test, it only ended up making 1,311 HP....needless to say far from their claim of 2,000 HP and needless to say Vortech once again embarrassed themselves to the entire world. Now Vortech is trying to re-market that same blower (V28) as the "new" V28-130 and are claiming again it will support 1800-2000 HP. All they changed from the last time was the new sprag drive.

Pro Charger has won 17 National Championships in the last 3 years. No other centrifugal blower manufacturer is even close to that. Guess what the quickest and fastest centrifugally powered Pro Car is right now....a Pro Mustang driven by Don Walsh Jr. that has gone 6.43 @ 216, and you guessed it...it is powered by a Pro Charger. When you are ready to play with the big boys, you better have a Pro Charger under the hood.
 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Dec 24, 2006
#36
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #36
I owned a vortech, When I first bolted it on I cried. I couldn't feel a differance. Its like going from a stock air filter, to a K&N.
Took a tiny pulley and custom tune to wake it up.
Prochargers make lots of power, but do so very unefficiently. Roughly 55% compressor efficiency.
Vortech is slightly better at 65%, but are over rated in the advertising for total flow capabilities.
Turbo is 75% efficient
And as for fabbing the turbo kit, my total cost was $1900, including the FMIC, turbo, mandrel bends, Waste Gate, and Bypass valve. All new parts.

Only thing you have to "MAKE" is the exhaust piping. All it is is welding pipe bends together. Takes some time (2 weeks about 4 hrs a day) to get everything done, but is by no means HARD to do.

As for emmissions, I don't have them in FL. SO you would be screwed there. Check out www.turbochargedpower.com
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Dec 24, 2006
#37
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #37
Rickey_Bobby said:
I owned a vortech, When I first bolted it on I cried. I couldn't feel a differance. Its like going from a stock air filter, to a K&N.
Took a tiny pulley and custom tune to wake it up.
Prochargers make lots of power, but do so very unefficiently. Roughly 55% compressor efficiency.
Vortech is slightly better at 65%, but are over rated in the advertising for total flow capabilities.
Turbo is 75% efficient
And as for fabbing the turbo kit, my total cost was $1900, including the FMIC, turbo, mandrel bends, Waste Gate, and Bypass valve. All new parts.

Only thing you have to "MAKE" is the exhaust piping. All it is is welding pipe bends together. Takes some time (2 weeks about 4 hrs a day) to get everything done, but is by no means HARD to do.

As for emmissions, I don't have them in FL. SO you would be screwed there. Check out www.turbochargedpower.com
Click to expand...

I feel ya on the Vortech installs. Sometimes they just aren't even worth the effort when factoring in their parasitic loss

You are speaking of adiabatic efficency. That is the the ratio of the work input required to raise the pressure of the incoming atmosphere to a specified value in a isentropic manner to the actual work input. Turbochargers without a doubt do that best, but the Pro Charger comes in a very strong second.

When speaking about thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and aerodynamics in terms of adiabatic efficiency, +/- 1% is a big deal. You can't just throw around generalizations as to various adiabatic efficiency ratings, it is a very precise measurement. For a centrifugal compressor to exhibit a 55% AE, it would have to have serious mechanical damage (in other words not normally possible.)

The self contained ATI Pro Charger compressors have been shown to exhibit around a 71-74% AE. This is due to the angle of the a outlet, superior impellar design and tolerances, and the less heat generated by their proprietary self contained lubrication which significantly reduces compressor heat. This all translates into a relatively high AE, and this is precisely how a Pro Charger is more efficienct than the others and makes way more power.

The Vortechs are around 65-67% AE. The hot engine oil design and the 90 degree outlets are just a few of the things that really hurt the AE of their compressors and hence why they are less reliable, are much "whinier", and make less HP.

Turbos are usually around 76-78% AE, and surprisingly do not show a whole lot of difference in the midsections of compressor maps when compared to the Pro Charger compressors. Turbos earn their keep up high.

This info was obtained by an independent test that Kroyer Racing Engines performed just a few years back in 2004.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Dec 24, 2006
#38
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #38
LaserRed01GT said:
Yes, it is a myth. Just because a few boneheads mistreat their motor or do not have the common sense to get it properly tuned, automatically excludes them from being allowed into statistical reality.
Click to expand...


LaserRed01GT said:
A few boneheads? By a few do you mean hundreds of people?



LaserRed01GT said:
You see, I am sure. I have been doing blower installs on cars for a long time now. Vortech makes some good products, but they aren't even close to the engineering quality of the ATI stuff....not even close.
Click to expand...
How are they "even close to the engineering quality of the ATI stuff"? Please explain in detail. Why do hundreds of people love Vortech for their quality products and results? Why do hundreds of people complain about ATI and their leaky head units? I don't think it was "just a bad batch".




LaserRed01GT said:
ATI had a very limted batch of bad compressor housing seals. The problem was instantly realized and has long since been remedied, and ATI made good on all the customer's head units. EVERY parts manufacturer is going to have a small problem every once in a while, it's unavoidable.
Click to expand...
Obviously every parts manufactually will have problems every once in a while. But how can you say " ATI made good on all the customer's head units"? By that do you mean charged hundreds of dollars to have the problem fixed? That's crappy customer service if you ask me. If I bought a BRAND NEW blower for thousands of dollars and it took a crap within months, I would be PISSED. They better fix that damn thing for FREE, no questions asked.

LaserRed01GT said:
ATI overrated claims??? You obviously have ATI confused with Vortech. ATI sued Vortech a while back in '99 because ATI flat out busted Vortech making outrageously overstated claims as to power increases and "claimed" duarability and performance of their kits. Vortech was also releasing false information that was vastly understating the performance, HP gains, and durability of the ATI products. Then ATI called out Vortech to some head-to-head testing and of course Vortech pussed out and declined. And needless to say, ATI won their lawsuit.
Click to expand...
I don't care what happened in 1999 buddy. That was eight years ago. That was then, and this is NOW. The fact is, ATI falsely advertises their product. Have you seen the recent test results comparing both the p1sc and the s-trim? The S-trim can creat more power hands down.

LaserRed01GT said:
I recently helped tune a 1996 Impala with a 383" LT4 w/ a P-1SC. It made 734 RWHP after all was said and done. And that was through a 4L80E and a 12 Bolt. So that is not enough for you? Step up to the D-1SC...850 RWHP no problem. Still not enough for you? Ok, how about the D-3R....1500 RWHP easy. Still not enough? How about the F-3R or F-4R....2000+ RWHP.
Click to expand...
I don't care what the Impala made. Were talking about MUSTANGS. Please find me a mustang that has made more than 550+WHP on the P1sc. Show me the time slip. Then I will shut up.



LaserRed01GT said:
Pro Charger has won 17 National Championships in the last 3 years. No other centrifugal blower manufacturer is even close to that. Guess what the quickest and fastest centrifugally powered Pro Car is right now....a Pro Mustang driven by Don Walsh Jr. that has gone 6.43 @ 216, and you guessed it...it is powered by a Pro Charger. When you are ready to play with the big boys, you better have a Pro Charger under the hood.
Click to expand...
In case you havn't noticed, the supercharger doesn't make the entire car as fast as it is. What about the suspension? The driver capability? The transmission and engine? There are many variables that make a fast car. So you CANNOT come here and say that procharger is the "BEST" because "the quickest and fastest centrifugally powered Pro Car is right now has a procharger on it".

Obviously everyone has their own opinion on what supercharger is the best to use. I like Vortech because as of now, mostly everyone is satisfied with their kits. Why are so many people pleased with their mongoose kits from MPH? You tell me ?
Click to expand...
 
T

thomas91169

I'd donkey punch my sister.
Aug 19, 2005
0
0
0
Modesto, CA
Dec 25, 2006
#39
  • Dec 25, 2006
  • #39
Rickey_Bobby said:
Remember to run a massive intercooler!!!
...like mine:
Click to expand...


w00t ebay FMIC FTW! I ran the same (well, looks exactly the same) core on my 97 Eclipse GST Spyder with awesome results. one day we were able to rig a post-IC IAT and log it via DSMlink, and compared to a spearco of the same design and size, mine was showing temps of 10-20* cooler and had less pressure drop(IE pressure read at maf as compared to pressure read at GM 3bar MAP sensor on the manifold). Plus the other guy spend 1000$ on his kit before piping, i spend 300$ total.
 

Attachments

  • steven_001.webp
    21.7 KB · Views: 220

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Dec 25, 2006
#40
  • Dec 25, 2006
  • #40
LaserRed01GT said:
http://www.procharger.com/lawsuit.html

I recently helped tune a 1996 Impala with a 383" LT4 w/ a P-1SC. It made 734 RWHP after all was said and done. And that was through a 4L80E and a 12 Bolt. So that is not enough for you? Step
Click to expand...


Show me one p1sc that has broke 600rwhp on 4.6l 2v without nitrous.
The strim has.
http://www. modularpowerhouse.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18244&highlight=vortech
Take the space out after www.

Thanks for the link back to prochargers site.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
I have some 4.6 questions.
  • whiskerz
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
294
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
squeak93
M
2001 cobra ignition timing off
  • Mike3
  • Jul 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
9
Views
166
SVT Tech Forum Aug 2, 2026
Mike3
M
S
ECU/PCM ISSUE
  • Santi1015
  • Jun 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
147
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2026
Santi1015
S
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
967
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
755
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?