• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

How to get my 289 into the 13s

  • Thread starter Thread starter WRXracer
  • Start date Start date May 20, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

WRXracer

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
825
0
0
May 20, 2004
#1
  • May 20, 2004
  • #1
what is a good way to get my 1966 289 into the 13s and still drive well..
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
May 20, 2004
#2
  • May 20, 2004
  • #2
370 gears, good exhaust, a stall converter, intake, and carb....and traction!
 
F

Fomocohipo

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
128
0
0
May 20, 2004
#3
  • May 20, 2004
  • #3
Boost.
 

beanplant

Founding Member
Jun 25, 2002
548
0
0
KC MO
May 20, 2004
#4
  • May 20, 2004
  • #4
370 gears, good exhaust, a stall converter, intake, and carb....and traction!
Click to expand...
That's it?! Wow. I used to have a 95 GT, and it woulda taken a lot more than that. What would it take for my 306 and 4.11s?

-Shaun
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
May 20, 2004
#5
  • May 20, 2004
  • #5
Don't leave out nitrous.
 
D

DAZ

Founding Member
Jun 7, 2002
180
0
17
Endwell, NY
May 21, 2004
#6
  • May 21, 2004
  • #6
Tow it with an SR5
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
May 21, 2004
#7
  • May 21, 2004
  • #7
beanplant said:
That's it?! Wow. I used to have a 95 GT, and it woulda taken a lot more than that. What would it take for my 306 and 4.11s?

-Shaun
Click to expand...


A 95 gt would have easily hit 13s with those mods too.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
May 21, 2004
#8
  • May 21, 2004
  • #8
NOS is the cheapest HP you can buy. You won't know it's there until you turn it on so drivability would not change on the street. Just don't get carried away with the shot size in a stock engine.
 

WRXracer

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
825
0
0
May 21, 2004
#9
  • May 21, 2004
  • #9
oh

I want everyday power..
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
May 21, 2004
#10
  • May 21, 2004
  • #10
if its got a 4 barrel carb, I've seen guys dip into the 13's will gears, traction, and good driving. The power is already there, you just have to know how to use it. don't need nitrous, boost, or any of that b.s. to get in the 13's. If you want to be sure, get a performer rpm(or weiand stealth) intake, a 600 holley, headers, and good dual exhaust. Coupled with at least a 3.50 gearset, you'll be in the 13's with some practice driving. Back when my car was stock, it ran a 14.6@94 with a 2barrel 302, stock C4, and 2.80 gears, with one back tire spinning like a mofo.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
May 21, 2004
#11
  • May 21, 2004
  • #11
{yoda} 302 Coupe wisely, he speak. {/yoda}
 

WRXracer

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
825
0
0
May 21, 2004
#12
  • May 21, 2004
  • #12
hehe

I have a 4bb with a edlebrok RPM intake and headers.. so im almost there huh..
 

BAD67FUN

Founding Member
Oct 31, 2001
589
0
0
Wisconsin
May 21, 2004
#13
  • May 21, 2004
  • #13
So I should be there....

Wow. That would be cool, very cool. I really don't feel it though. I've got a new B&M kit coming for my slushy C4. If that works out okay, then maybe I can see the 13's.

Hope to find out soon.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
May 21, 2004
#14
  • May 21, 2004
  • #14
you have some really great headers!!!!!!!!!! hehehehe
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
May 21, 2004
#15
  • May 21, 2004
  • #15
mathematically speaking, it only takes about 220 hp to accelerate a 3000lb object thru a 1/4 mile in 13.91 seconds. However, just because you have 3000lb car and 220 hp doesn't mean you will run the 1/4 mile in 13.91 seconds. Thats the importance of practice and 'dialing-in' your combo.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
May 21, 2004
#16
  • May 21, 2004
  • #16
Well, 220hp at the rear wheel is a lot more than a stock 289/302 produces.

<i>""Back when my car was stock, it ran a 14.6@94 with a 2barrel 302, stock C4, and 2.80 gears, with one back tire spinning like a mofo.""</i>


I have owned a number of 302 C4 cars, and never had one even come close to this. Wondering how you pulled this off, especially with those gears. Hell, I was barely able to squeel the tires on most of em.

I work for a book publisher that distributes all the old road test books, and rarely did a 390GT break into the 14s. The 66 289 k motored cars ran about 15.2 and most the 390GTs ran 15.2 to 14.9.

Real interested to learn how you got a 2 barrel stock 302 with complete highway gears to beat all these cars.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
May 21, 2004
#17
  • May 21, 2004
  • #17
I can try to find the timeslip if you like...however, I can't vouch for other peoples times or for the magazine articles of the day. I think it was car and driver or something that got a 13.3 out of an '03 cobra, and Evan Smith ran a 12.6. I'm sure there is some driver error in most of the numbers in magazines.

As for the 302, I rebuilt it myself. Here are the specs: .030 over 79 block, hypereutectic pistons giving 9.2:1 compression, bone stock 79 heads(boat anchors), melling rv cam(labled as hi-torque or something, had like .420 lift), 1970 2 barrel intake, autolite 2100 carb, 77 302 exhaust manifolds(slightly better than early log type manifolds), 2 1/4 inch dual exhaust with generic turbo mufflers. Hardly a hot rod, but it ran well.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
May 21, 2004
#18
  • May 21, 2004
  • #18
302 coupe said:
I can try to find the timeslip if you like...however, I can't vouch for other peoples times or for the magazine articles of the day. I think it was car and driver or something that got a 13.3 out of an '03 cobra, and Evan Smith ran a 12.6. I'm sure there is some driver error in most of the numbers in magazines.

As for the 302, I rebuilt it myself. Here are the specs: .030 over 79 block, hypereutectic pistons giving 9.2:1 compression, bone stock 79 heads(boat anchors), melling rv cam(labled as hi-torque or something, had like .420 lift), 1970 2 barrel intake, autolite 2100 carb, 77 302 exhaust manifolds(slightly better than early log type manifolds), 2 1/4 inch dual exhaust with generic turbo mufflers. Hardly a hot rod, but it ran well.
Click to expand...
Just guessing here, but I'd bet your tires were much better than the OE from the magazine tests?
 

calpolymustang

Member
Feb 1, 2004
217
0
16
Santa Rosa, CA
May 21, 2004
#19
  • May 21, 2004
  • #19
I know guys with 289s that run 12s without NOS. One coupe that ran 12.8s had 3000stall, 4.11 gears, Alum. heads with 2.02 intakes, and a .500" cam. 3000 stall is a huge help to a reving engine, especially when the bottom end lacks torque. Even a 2200 stall would help a lot. Getting the right shift kit for a green dot tranny is tricky, so you may want to leave the inside of the trany alone. It took a while before I realized that to control the 2-3 shift, I had to move the shifter back to 'L' . Also, gears make a big difference. I run 3.40s and get decent milage on my 300 mile trips to Cal Poly where i go to college. I run at 3400rpm all the way down the freeway at 75mph. Get a well built exhaust system.

Heres what I recommend:
AFR 195cc
2800 stall, though you may want to go higher or lower
a strong cam matched to the stall amount and your compresion
Speed Demon 650cfm
3.50 posi
Performer RPM intake, i think the air gap version might be too tight
NO POINTS IN THE DISTRIBUTOR!
2.5 exhaust with H-pipe, 2 chamber flowmasters

As far as tires go, I cant say what to run, but air down! Not too much though: the sparking traction from aluminum rims, when the tire comes off, is not a fun experiance.

Don't forget that everything inside your car has to be accelerated to 100mph at the end of the track. The less it weighs, the quicker it will be.


also, props to the 14.6sec 302
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
May 22, 2004
#20
  • May 22, 2004
  • #20
Hack said:
Just guessing here, but I'd bet your tires were much better than the OE from the magazine tests?
Click to expand...

probably, I had 225/60/15 BFG comp t/a's
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
86
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
R
First project car and first time learning on cars
  • Rustang jr
  • Oct 2, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
9
Views
343
The Welcome Wagon Oct 6, 2025
Rustang jr
R
P
1964.5 289 Convertible - power steering hose routing bracket question
  • planters49
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
378
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Mar 6, 2025
manicmechanic007
D
Brakes 1966 Mustang convertible 289, Auto - Disc brake conversion issues
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
687
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 23, 2026
All Stock93
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
DTCRAWLEY
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?