• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

i have 1.6 and 1.7 RR's, which ones should i run with my setup?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cenok is family
  • Start date Start date Aug 18, 2008

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
41
Norman, Ok
www.facebook.com
Aug 18, 2008
#1
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #1
i'm about to put my motor back together, but can't decide which set i'm going to install. i have some crane/ford 1.7 roller rockers and a set of proform 1.6 rockers. my mods are everything in my sig, and i'm installing a set of thumper heads with 1.94/1.6 valves, an afm n-412 cam, and my 24# squirter's are going back on with a matching 75mm proflow MAF. afm's site says to use 1.6's, but what do you guys think? here are the specs on my cam:

N-412 Cam Spec

Engine 302HO/351

Duration at .006 -- Int. 276 Exh. 284
Duration at .050 -- Int. 222 Exh. 230
Timing events at .050 --Int. 3/39 Exh. 51/-1
Lobe lift @ cam -- Int. .320 Exh. .320

Gross Valve Lift w/1.6 Int. 0.512 Exh. 0.512

-Lobe Seperation 112
-Degree intake Lobe to 108
-Valve Lash (hot) Int. & Exh. 0

the lift will be .544 with the 1.7's. and ptv clearance won't be an issue with my pistons.
 
9

92notch6886

New Member
Nov 15, 2006
15
0
0
Aug 18, 2008
#2
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #2
Ive heard bad stuff about Proform parts, so i will say the Crane/Ford rockers
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Aug 18, 2008
#3
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #3
id go with the 1.6
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 18, 2008
#4
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #4
All else equal, the 1.7s by definition are going to give you more flow, and thus, more power. As for quality of parts, I can't say.
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
61
cleveland, oh
Aug 18, 2008
#5
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #5
have you considered running the 1.6's on the intake side an 1.7's on exhaust since the exhaust side of the heads don't flow quite as well.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Aug 18, 2008
#6
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #6
lang williams said:
have you considered running the 1.6's on the intake side an 1.7's on exhaust since the exhaust side of the heads don't flow quite as well.
Click to expand...

you can do that? where you would you find a set of 8 rocker arms?
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
Aug 18, 2008
#7
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #7
Check their (split ratios) items.... sets of (8) 1.6 and (8) 1.7 ratio rockers...... stud mount only though.
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
61
cleveland, oh
Aug 18, 2008
#8
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #8
you have to have 2 sets to do it, but then you have 2 sets of split ratio! My friend does it on his 3 cam 100 shot car.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
41
Norman, Ok
www.facebook.com
Aug 18, 2008
#9
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #9
lang williams said:
have you considered running the 1.6's on the intake side an 1.7's on exhaust since the exhaust side of the heads don't flow quite as well.
Click to expand...

yeah i actually have heard about doing that and it did cross my mind, but i havent really heard that much about it and any effects, if any. but if i were to do that, why shouldn't i just run straight 1.7's?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 19, 2008
#10
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #10
cenok is family said:
yeah i actually have heard about doing that and it did cross my mind, but i havent really heard that much about it and any effects, if any. but if i were to do that, why shouldn't i just run straight 1.7's?
Click to expand...

I would think that you should just run the 1.7s, especially since you feel like P-T-V clearance won't be an issue. Build the motor with the 1.7s, run it a few times to make sure they work well, then sell the 1.6s to some sucker that wants to run split ratio. Either way, I think you may be splitting hairs, I've never heard of anyone making more than ~10hp by switching from stockers to rollers. I'd think switching between 1.6 and 1.7 RRs, you'll see even less difference.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
41
Norman, Ok
www.facebook.com
Aug 19, 2008
#11
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #11
NikwoaC said:
I would think that you should just run the 1.7s, especially since you feel like P-T-V clearance won't be an issue. Build the motor with the 1.7s, run it a few times to make sure they work well, then sell the 1.6s to some sucker that wants to run split ratio. Either way, I think you may be splitting hairs, I've never heard of anyone making more than ~10hp by switching from stockers to rollers. I'd think switching between 1.6 and 1.7 RRs, you'll see even less difference.
Click to expand...

yeah that's probably what i'm going to end up doing. hah yeah i didn't think this was going to be the 'end all' power maker, but since i have both, i wanted to make sure i have the better set in there. thanks everyone for your input!
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 19, 2008
#12
  • Aug 19, 2008
  • #12
I would use the one that the camshaft lobe is designed for.

No need to run splits.

Good Luck!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
968
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
I
289 cam break in help
  • iaff284
  • Aug 19, 2022
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
820
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 19, 2022
iaff284
I
D
Engine Camshaft Question
  • durkzz801
  • Jun 15, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 16, 2022
limp
Engine 351W - Std cam or Roller?
  • ClevelandTim
  • Dec 1, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 2, 2019
vristang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?