• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

I have one T3 Turbo, Could I Modify one header for low boost?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Starscream88
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

shttygtstang

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
978
0
0
Jul 26, 2004
#21
  • Jul 26, 2004
  • #21
go to a junkyard its a risk but i picked one up for a custom project from a eclipse fo 100 bucks
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Jul 26, 2004
#22
  • Jul 26, 2004
  • #22
**** i wouldnt want anything from a eclipse. would pull one off a old turbo coupe if i wanted one but i got the good ol' VORTECH.
 

shttygtstang

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
978
0
0
Jul 26, 2004
#23
  • Jul 26, 2004
  • #23
there the same t25 t25
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Jul 26, 2004
#24
  • Jul 26, 2004
  • #24
Starscream88 said:
Yeah I got it all covered,

Im gonna search for this turbos twin, and twin intercoolers, Or ill weld them together,

run low boost

and have some fun
Click to expand...


Twin intercoolers? You use one big single one. You really need to do some more research. What car did the turbo come from? Whats the A/R? Most T3 turbo wastegates are calibrated to open at no more than 10psi.
 

Starscream88

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
1,277
1
0
Park Ridge NJ
Jul 26, 2004
#25
  • Jul 26, 2004
  • #25
Its a Garrett T3,

Exhaust A/R 48 Compressor A/R 42

You can use twin intercoolers, Not a problem

However you obviously need a "Y" piece to connect them both after cooling,

And the Turbo Actuators do open lower than 10 Psi.
With an ajustable Actuator Rod you just keep turning for "more" or "Less"

With two Identical Turbos, Id start with counting the threads, The longer the Actuator Rod the less boost the turbos would produce,

I have some pics I just took of the turbo,
Im gonna re-size them and post them if anyones interested?
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Jul 26, 2004
#26
  • Jul 26, 2004
  • #26
you don't need to intercool a turbocharged motor... especially when you don't want to go nuts with power output anyways.

I don't like leaf-blowers ("centrifugal superchargers") because they waste horsepower by being belt driven. Turbocharging rather takes advantage of exhaust energy that is residual from the combustion process that would otherwise be mostly wasted.

The exception is positive-displacement blowers, cause they make boost NOW and make the same boost up to redline.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 26, 2004
#27
  • Jul 26, 2004
  • #27
Ray! "you don't need to intercool a turbocharged motor" Any time air is compressed, it's also heated - doesn't matter whether it's a belt driven compressor or an exhaust driven compressor. In fact, turbos probably put more heat in the intake stream because of the exhaust turbine's close proximity to the compressor turbine. Turbo boost requires intercooling just like supercharger boost does -- unless you want to run it pig rich with no timing (just like with a supercharger) to avoid detonation. Besides - it's free HP. All else equal, you gain 1/2% to 1% HP for each 10F decrease in intake air temp. You definitely want to intercool a turbocharged motor.

Saab (who have as much or more experience with turbocharged engines as anyone else out there) recently offered a low-pressure turbo on their 3.0L V-6 that was configured just exactly like what was proposed here. Only one bank of 3 cylinders was hooked to the turbo -- the other 3 cylinders were exhausted as they would normally be. The result was a low pressure turbo that didn't produce huge peak HP numbers, but made exceptional torque low in the rpm range. A set up like that can definitely be made to work - but as with anything else innovative and unique, it's gonna take resources to make it work well. A bit of trial and error engineering. The turbo should be sized for about half the 5.0L's size (something that came off of a 2.2-2.5L four cylinder ought to work) since it's dealing with only one bank of the V-8's cylinders.
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Jul 27, 2004
#28
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #28
if i were doing a twin turbo v8, i would use the bigger T3 that in turbocoupes, merkur's ,cougar's (God forbid) and SVO's. Here is a good list to go by (credit due :http://fordturbo.com/mainframe.html)

===========
What cars have what size turbo?
83-84 GT Turbo .60 & .63 A/R
83-84 Capri RS Turbo .60 & .63 A/R
84-86 XR7 Coug .60 & .63 A/R
84-85 SVO .60 & .63 A/R
85.5-86 Svo .60 & .48 A/R
83-86 TC .60 & .63 A/R
87-88 TC IHI Turbo
Early 85 XR4TI .60 & .63 A/R
85.5-89 XR4TI .60 & .48 A/R
================

the .48 hotside is ok, but the .63 would be better for less back pressure that the larger displament would create.
These numbers are usualy stamped on the compressor housing...so keep your eyes open.
 

Starscream88

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
1,277
1
0
Park Ridge NJ
Jul 27, 2004
#29
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #29
So Michael your saying I "Could" do this?

Would this turbo I have be sufficiant?
Or should I look for a bigger Exhaust compressor?

heres some pics guys,
Not bad for an old Turbo huh



 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 27, 2004
#30
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #30
I'm saying if OEM's have done it, there's certainly potential there. As for the proper turbo - I can't help you there. I know a lot of folks out there tend to think a turbo is a turbo - that they're some kind of commodity you just bolt on for more power. And of course it doesn't work that way. To make the system work well you need someone to help you pick the proper size turbo, A/R ratio, etc. so that it's capable of handling the flows on both sides of the turbine, and making boost where you want it to. The nice thing about just tapping into one side of the exhaust flow is that it simplifies the plumbing. If you decide to go this way, let us know how it works out.
 

cjman15

Banned
Apr 15, 2004
1,009
0
0
Fairfield, PA
Jul 27, 2004
#31
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #31
not too bad at all
 

Starscream88

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
1,277
1
0
Park Ridge NJ
Jul 27, 2004
#32
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #32
What I might do is find this ones twin,

Try this out on one header, see if it runs ok,

If it does ill leave it, If not then I have the other one standing by for the other side,

I mean im not going to do this right now,
but soon,
I want to get all the bits first
 

shttygtstang

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
978
0
0
Jul 27, 2004
#33
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #33
i say go for it but ill let you know there wont be a big gain maybe 30 hp that small turbo needs to be cooled down though use a intercooler
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
653
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Electrical Innovate PSB-1 is DOA? Am I an idiot? All plausable. Please Help
  • Dontknowchit
  • Apr 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
470
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 26, 2025
Dontknowchit
Stand alone vs chip tune (for noob)
  • nicholase
  • Jan 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2025
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?