I've sold my 1993 GT and am planning on buying a cobra this spring. What year between 1994 and 1998 is better? 5.0 or 4.6 dohc is the question. Any insight on this??
spanky442 said:I love them both, but the 1993 I will never part with. The 1997 is nice but it gets lost in the crowd. QUOTE]
I really like the '93 Cobra's as well, but also like the 96-98 models alot. Perhaps among serious Cobra/Mustang enthusiasts the '93 would garner more attention, but for everyday driving, mine certainly does not get lost in the crowd. Maybe I don't have that many Cobra's/Mustangs in the area? After all I do live in Metro West Boston, the land of Yuppies, Volvo's and BMW's...
And the '96 overheating issue is not a huge deal, unless you live in Arizona or the extreme Southeast...
ponyexpress302 said:Im kinda leaning toward 96-98 cobra but whats holding me back is the drift Im getting about serious lack of low end torque and it not being unusual for people putting 4.10s in their daily drivers. Im definitely used to the 5.0 and Im all about low end torque, so in your opinion would the better top end of the 4.6 dohc make up the fun factor of the lost low end?? OR is the 5.0 feel just not replaceable by a 4.6?