• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

i want gears!...future supercharger though...

  • Thread starter Thread starter supastang03
  • Start date Start date Apr 9, 2007

supastang03

Member
Mar 17, 2004
214
0
16
Miami/Gainesville UF
Apr 9, 2007
#1
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #1
Ok heres the question. i really want some gears for my stang, but i think im going to get a kenne bell in about a year, and i dont want to have to switch out my gears if i get it. Im not 100% sure if ill get it, but if i do, i want to have appropriate gears for the extra power (if i knew for sure, id probably just get the 3.55 gears). Are 3.73s commonly done with superchargers, or is it smarter to just leave the stock gears if im thinking blown..?
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Apr 9, 2007
#2
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #2
Honestly my suggestion is save the money for the blower, drive the car a month or so after that...then you'll know if you need more gear or not by how it feels and your personal driving style.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Apr 9, 2007
#3
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #3
Im in the same situation. I want a blower soon too, but I dont know when I will actually be able to afford one. I also want to get some 4:10's right now, but I think they might be overkill when I get a blower. The 3:55's I have are ok, but i know the 4:10's would be nice on the Mach. And 373's would be a waste of money 4 me.
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Apr 9, 2007
#4
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #4
EPIKGT said:
Im in the same situation. I want a blower soon too, but I dont know when I will actually be able to afford one. I also want to get some 4:10's right now, but I think they might be overkill when I get a blower. The 3:55's I have are ok, but i know the 4:10's would be nice on the Mach. And 373's would be a waste of money 4 me.
Click to expand...

You could do like me and get 3.90's Honestly though, everybody is different, and you might not want more gear after a blower. I was pretty satisfied when I was running 3.55's and my Vortech, but I decided on even more gear after running 3.73's for a brief period...thus the 3.90's going in asap.
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
Apr 9, 2007
#5
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #5
I'd go with 3.73's with a blower.
 
M

mineralgraygt

Member
Jan 4, 2006
187
0
16
nj
Apr 9, 2007
#6
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #6
yea i would go 373 with a blower i got 410s and im backing down to a 373 soon for a blower.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 10, 2007
#7
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #7
I have 4.10's with a blower and love it. but it is a centri and it gets me to the boost faster. with the KB it would be a bit excessive.

go 3.73's
 

supastang03

Member
Mar 17, 2004
214
0
16
Miami/Gainesville UF
Apr 10, 2007
#8
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #8
hmm so 3.73 is not too much gear for a blown car?
 

ProCharger GT

Member
Jun 3, 2004
153
0
16
Cleveland
Apr 10, 2007
#9
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #9
3.73 is fine for a blown car. those are what i run.
 

blacksheep-1

Member
Oct 21, 2006
322
4
18
Apr 10, 2007
#10
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #10
I'm with Benny, do the blower first. I run a KB and I was really impressed with the performance. It put down 342rwhp and about 310-320 rwt on the dyno.(6psi non I/C) very mild tune. If you do the math, that should be about a 12.5-12.7 car. The plus side with the stock gears is that I get 23 mpg on the interstate. I did however go to 3.55s recently. If mileage is an issue, and if you have some $$ to spend, you might consider going to a lighter flywheel. This is an option that worked extremely well on the street, and doesn't effect mileage, emisions or anything else.
That being said, there are NO other mods that will make a bigger improvement on a NA car than gears.
One other thing, IMHO buy the KB "tuner" kit and have a local guy supply the chip, and injectors. KB's customer service is non-existant, so the less you have to deal with them, the better.
 

blkhorse

Founding Member
Oct 30, 1999
345
1
18
Apr 10, 2007
#11
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #11
I have 3:73's with my kb@ 9psi,5 speed, I think there perfect. 1rst gear can be tricky. if I drop the hammer at about 2800 rpm in 2nd on a chip sealed road with bfg kdw's it picks the frontend up and ****s and gits. on smooth asphault traction is an issue
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Apr 10, 2007
#12
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #12
BennyBlown2v said:
Honestly my suggestion is save the money for the blower, drive the car a month or so after that...then you'll know if you need more gear or not by how it feels and your personal driving style.
Click to expand...

^^^^

If you DO get gears, don't go higher than 3.73. Or you'll never get enough traction.
 
E

El Diablo

Member
Aug 1, 2004
53
0
6
Apr 10, 2007
#13
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #13
Manual = 373's blown

Auto = 410's blown
 
S

saleen556

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
387
0
0
Hillsboro,OR
Apr 10, 2007
#14
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #14
3.73s will be fine. You will enjoy them now and even more when you slap the blower on.
 

supastang03

Member
Mar 17, 2004
214
0
16
Miami/Gainesville UF
Apr 10, 2007
#15
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #15
awesome thanks for the help guys...ill give it some thought..
 

BlownStangGT

REPEAT
Founding Member
Jan 22, 2002
3,860
6
58
Lancaster, PA
Apr 10, 2007
#16
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #16
yeah from my reading I find that 3.73s seem to be a good blower gear
 
C

cronin49

Banned
Aug 12, 2003
432
1
16
SC
Apr 10, 2007
#17
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #17
This subject has been beaten to death.
With 410's you might run out of gear at the track.
You gotta shift into 5th at around 113- 115 with 410's, and by then you're out of the power band.
That's cutting it pretty close if you're putting out decent power.
I have 373's and with a good 60' time I can trap higher than 115, so I say go with 373's when force fed.
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Apr 11, 2007
#18
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #18
3.73s
 
W

WillDuhhBeast

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
339
0
0
Jacksonville Florida
Apr 11, 2007
#19
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #19
cronin49 said:
This subject has been beaten to death.
With 410's you might run out of gear at the track.
You gotta shift into 5th at around 113- 115 with 410's, and by then you're out of the power band.
That's cutting it pretty close if you're putting out decent power.
I have 373's and with a good 60' time I can trap higher than 115, so I say go with 373's when force fed.
Click to expand...

I ran consistant 1.9 60ft times, and I could only manage to trap 113. I have 3.73's and it's a 5 speed. Granted, this was on street tires, and a pretty nasty slipping clutch. Maybe I spun going into second pretty bad too.


As far as this topic goes, its all the same.

Auto, roots/twin screw 4.10
Auto, centri 4.10+

Manual roots/twin screw 3.73
Manual centri 4.10


A lot of this depends on what tires you're running at the track. If you're running tall tires, it can mess up you gearing. You basically don't want to have to shift to 5th. Traction also has to do with where you'l be in your rpm band.
 
C

cronin49

Banned
Aug 12, 2003
432
1
16
SC
Apr 11, 2007
#20
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #20
WillDuhhBeast said:
I ran consistant 1.9 60ft times, and I could only manage to trap 113. I have 3.73's and it's a 5 speed. Granted, this was on street tires, and a pretty nasty slipping clutch. Maybe I spun going into second pretty bad too.


As far as this topic goes, its all the same.

Auto, roots/twin screw 4.10
Auto, centri 4.10+

Manual roots/twin screw 3.73
Manual centri 4.10


A lot of this depends on what tires you're running at the track. If you're running tall tires, it can mess up you gearing. You basically don't want to have to shift to 5th. Traction also has to do with where you'l be in your rpm band.
Click to expand...

Thats a good trap speed bro... what was your et? Nice 60' too. From what I see at the track, anything under 2 seconds is good.
Try staging as shallow as you can, believe it or not that little bit of rolling you do before you break the beam is good for at least a tenth, maybe 2.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
553
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
909
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
569
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
9
WTB: Procharger or Vortech Supercharger – 1996–1998 Mustang GT 4.6 2V – Budget $3,200
  • 96mustang.gt
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
333
Want to Buy May 3, 2026
roblabsn95
R
D
03 mustang Mach 1, 4.6L None Supercharge
  • DangStitches
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
348
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 23, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?