• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

ID 390

  • Thread starter Thread starter woodsnake
  • Start date Start date May 1, 2010

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
May 1, 2010
#1
  • May 1, 2010
  • #1
I have a line on a 390 locally for a hundred bucks. Is there a quick way I can prove an auto application, VS a truck 390 from the PN on the block or intake?
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
May 1, 2010
#2
  • May 1, 2010
  • #2
On the block you can't it would be the same either way. The block may or may not have even had numbers, Ford was kinda sloppy about that with FE engines.

The intake, and heads, are a much better indicator.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 1, 2010
#3
  • May 1, 2010
  • #3
Ford used the same blocks and in many cases heads in both applications. The late 60's intermediate cars (66-70 Mustang/Fairlane,etc) got a 14 bolt exhaust pattern unique to them (16 in the case of the 428CJ heads) So that would be a giveaway, but after 40 years, anyone could have changed all that long since it left the factory (I did for one with a 67 GT 390 into a 70 F100) $100 isn't a bad price for any 390, provided the all the parts are serviceable,
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
May 1, 2010
#4
  • May 1, 2010
  • #4
Well, in my mind I had been planning a 4xx inch W platform, but for the money, I could go big block as well, especially as I am not concerned about it being original. I know there are some differences between auto and truck applications, and that is my concern. I have heard there is a lot of good info of the FE forum, I just haven't really looked into any of it until today. A 390 69 Cougar that's actually a 450+ plant might be fun to drive, especially with a stick. Would a Tremec still hold up to that much motor?
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
May 1, 2010
#5
  • May 1, 2010
  • #5
woodsnake said:
Well, in my mind I had been planning a 4xx inch W platform, but for the money, I could go big block as well, especially as I am not concerned about it being original. I know there are some differences between auto and truck applications, and that is my concern. I have heard there is a lot of good info of the FE forum, I just haven't really looked into any of it until today. A 390 69 Cougar that's actually a 450+ plant might be fun to drive, especially with a stick. Would a Tremec still hold up to that much motor?
Click to expand...

The Tremec has been used for years with big Ford engines.

The heads need the Mustang/Cougar pattern for anything stock, but some of the Mustang/Cougar headers will fit the big car pattern, too.

 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 1, 2010
#6
  • May 1, 2010
  • #6
woodsnake said:
Well, in my mind I had been planning a 4xx inch W platform, but for the money, I could go big block as well, especially as I am not concerned about it being original. I know there are some differences between auto and truck applications, and that is my concern. I have heard there is a lot of good info of the FE forum, I just haven't really looked into any of it until today. A 390 69 Cougar that's actually a 450+ plant might be fun to drive, especially with a stick. Would a Tremec still hold up to that much motor?
Click to expand...

The tricky part here is if you've got a small block car, a stroker Windsor will be far more cost effective. To swap in an FE in a small block car, you have to change mounts (which are 3 piece per side with the FE) transmission and transmission cross member. All that will cost you another couple hundred dollars at a minimum, if you don't have the stuff already (not including the transmission) If you've got a large budget, then that's not a problem.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
May 1, 2010
#7
  • May 1, 2010
  • #7
Well, I don't have as big a budget as I'd like. I guess I'll stick with plan A and go with a 4xx W....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
209
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
S
1965 Mustang with 80s 5.0 engine in it Power Steering hose or connection ID?
  • spearce
  • May 19, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
122
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
B
manual swap
  • brockb
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
242
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2026
squeak93
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
668
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
A
SN95 Hydroboost in a Fox | Brake lines
  • arc_jpiv
  • Sep 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
345
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 14, 2026
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?