• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Ignition Timing

  • Thread starter Thread starter JD1964
  • Start date Start date Sep 16, 2013

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Sep 16, 2013
#1
  • Sep 16, 2013
  • #1
I know there are factory settings but with mods and all that, sometimes adjusting ignition timing to other than factory settings can help performance.

I currently have mine set at 12 BTDC and it runs good with no spark knock on 87 octane. I was told by a particular tuner I can go up to 14 BTDC as long as I run high test gas.

What are your thoughts on performance differences at different timing settings? Will ignition timing that is advanced hurt top end? I don't expect a ton of bottom end tq from a 5.0 so I'm wondering if there is a trade off. My point is, why would you want to make an adjustment that would compromise top end on a smaller motor such as 5.0 that depends primarily on top end to get the job done?

I guess to be more specific. Will difference timing settings affect either top or bottom end power/tq?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Sep 16, 2013
#2
  • Sep 16, 2013
  • #2
The factory sets the timing conservative because the cars are made for the masses and for emissions. However, on a stock or nearish stock engine, the difference between 12 and 14 BTDC may be negligable and not worth the increased price of premium gas. I wouldnt run 14 or more degrees on anything less than 91 and keep an ear out for pinging or excess temperature. The inreased timing will help lower end performance and most of us don't spend most of the time at top end in our daily driving.
 

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
Sep 17, 2013
#3
  • Sep 17, 2013
  • #3
John Dirks Jr said:
I guess to be more specific. Will difference timing settings affect either top or bottom end power/tq?
Click to expand...

Another thought also, ...when you max out a performance timing set up, you are very sensitive to climate change etc.. Unless you like to change the timing a lot on a DD, get it kinda close but leave a little room so you're not under the hood all the time doing the same thing.
 
R

reldla1996

Member
May 4, 2011
356
22
19
Dayton, Ohio
Sep 17, 2013
#4
  • Sep 17, 2013
  • #4
Taking data out of a book entitled 5.0L Ford Dyno Test, written by Richard Holdner, he performed a dyno test on a stock 5.0 except for flowmaster mufflers, and changing the timing from stock 10 degrees to 15 degrees increased power by 1 hp at 2500, 3 hp at 3500, 7 hp at 4500, and 6 hp at 5500. I've always ran mine advanced, ran premium gas, and enjoyed the difference. Can't say I ever had to change timing with weather differences, but all engines are different.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Sep 17, 2013
#5
  • Sep 17, 2013
  • #5
I think I'll try 14 with high test.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Sep 18, 2013
#6
  • Sep 18, 2013
  • #6
reldla1996 said:
Taking data out of a book entitled 5.0L Ford Dyno Test, written by Richard Holdner, he performed a dyno test on a stock 5.0 except for flowmaster mufflers, and changing the timing from stock 10 degrees to 15 degrees increased power by 1 hp at 2500, 3 hp at 3500, 7 hp at 4500, and 6 hp at 5500. I've always ran mine advanced, ran premium gas, and enjoyed the difference. Can't say I ever had to change timing with weather differences, but all engines are different.
Click to expand...

Exactly my point. For the majority of time, you are driving under 4000 rpm in normal daily driving. It's up to each person to decide if 3 hp worth the extra 30- 50 cents a gallon. If you drive 15000 miles a year and average 18 mpg , that's a lot to pay for 3hp- almost $400.

Now, to provide full disclosure, I run 14 degrees and run 93, but I put less than 8k miles on my car a year so the cost is not as much as a DD. If it were still a DD, I'd back it down to 10-12 and run 87 and save the money for other go fast parts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
459
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
292
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
189
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
274
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
641
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?