• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

Info leaked on the 2011 GT from Edmund's

  • Thread starter Thread starter MeanMike
  • Start date Start date Dec 17, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Dec 28, 2009
#81
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #81
Per Autoblog regarding weight and performace (expected)
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/28/2011-ford-mustang-gt-offcially-rolls-with-a-5-0-v8/
No word on performance figures, but expect a mid-four second 0-60 sprint and a quarter-mile in the high 12s. At least. Especially as the current Mustang GT (315-hp, 320 lb-ft of torque) hits 60 mph in 4.9 seconds and runs the quarter in 13.5. Oh, according to Ford, the new 5.0 weighs just ten pounds more than the outgoing GT. We like that last bit very much.
Click to expand...
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 28, 2009
#82
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #82
Anyone catch this little tid bit....

The engine, as shipped, weighs just 430 pounds. This represents a weight savings of more than 20 percent versus the previous 5.0-liter offering.
Click to expand...
 

GreyDiesel

New Member
Jul 26, 2008
167
1
0
Denver, CO
Dec 28, 2009
#83
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #83
yeah, I just read the autoblog article. I am hoping something is wrong with that stat sheet. It says the weights are just approximate, and many of the approximations say 4000 pounds. I doubt the weight is actually 4grand on the dot. Maybe... hopefully, these weights are VERY loosely quoted.

And, according to autoblog, the engine is the same weight as the outgoing 4.6, so the only weight gain would come from the new tranny. Do they really weigh that much more than the current Tremec?
 

V_Eight

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
617
1
0
ATL
Dec 28, 2009
#84
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #84
We need pictures of the two new colors.
 
G

Gregor111

Member
Sep 23, 2008
95
0
6
Spokane, WA
Dec 28, 2009
#85
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #85
Gearbanger 101 said:
Anyone catch this little tid bit....
Click to expand...

I really hope the new car isn't as heavy as initially reported. New colors? Drop the butt ugly gold please.

I am curious what the Brembo brake package is going to run.

Greg
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Dec 28, 2009
#86
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #86
Here's a video I found. It sounds good! I hope they keep the wait down like reported on autoblog. They said it only gained about 20lbs over a 2010.

2011 Mustang GT 5.0 Video of Dyno and Cruising Runs | StangNet
 

ufnavy06

Member
May 23, 2006
292
0
16
Jacksonville, Florida
Dec 28, 2009
#87
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #87
Well if the weight can remain the same as the outgoing GT, the 5.0 will own the 6.3. Maybe they had to mod the suspension some to balance the car because the engine is going to sit differently. I'm no tech junkie but that's the ONLY thing I think of if it gained 200+ lbs.
 
G

Gregor111

Member
Sep 23, 2008
95
0
6
Spokane, WA
Dec 28, 2009
#88
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #88
GreyDiesel said:
yeah, I just read the autoblog article. I am hoping something is wrong with that stat sheet. It says the weights are just approximate, and many of the approximations say 4000 pounds. I doubt the weight is actually 4grand on the dot. Maybe... hopefully, these weights are VERY loosely quoted.

And, according to autoblog, the engine is the same weight as the outgoing 4.6, so the only weight gain would come from the new tranny. Do they really weigh that much more than the current Tremec?
Click to expand...

If the new engine is 20% lighter at 430 pounds, the outgoing 4.6 must have weighed 500+. There is no way a 6-speed manual should add more than 100 pounds so I can't see the new car weighing much more than the 2010. Where is the weight gain? Not the engine. Maybe the transmission but what else?

Greg
 
R

rk2112

New Member
Jul 12, 2009
23
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Dec 28, 2009
#89
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #89
Gregor111 said:
If the new engine is 20% lighter at 430 pounds, the outgoing 4.6 must have weighed 500+. There is no way a 6-speed manual should add more than 100 pounds so I can't see the new car weighing much more than the 2010. Where is the weight gain? Not the engine. Maybe the transmission but what else?

Greg
Click to expand...

The new 5.0 is 20% lighter than the '95 5.0 engine

"The new all-aluminum block for the 5.0-liter has helped reduce engine weight to just 430 pounds. This is a weight savings of more than 20 percent from the previous 5.0-liter offering."
 

blacksheep06

New Member
Jan 31, 2006
288
0
0
Dec 29, 2009
#90
  • Dec 29, 2009
  • #90
Yes!!!!!

I'm so excited!!!!!!!!!

The '11 is getting 412HP !!!!!!

It's getting a 6 speed!!!!!!!!!!

It weighs 3900 lbs........

nevermind
 

V_Eight

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
617
1
0
ATL
Dec 29, 2009
#91
  • Dec 29, 2009
  • #91
It doesn't weigh 3900 pounds. Calm down.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 29, 2009
#92
  • Dec 29, 2009
  • #92
It makes me laugh how so many would shy away from the best Mustang ever built just because if put on a couple of pounds (if that in fact is the case). It'll still outrun, out stop and out handle any Factory Mustang built to date (save for an '03-'04 and GT500). I mean....my Cougar weighs 3,900lbs dry and it's more than a match for any factory Mustang, save for above mentioned ones....and it’s got IRS and a trunk big enough to fit 3-full sized adults (should I ever need to do so ). And hell, it looks like it should be driven by a real estate salesman.

I mean…it’s alright that the Camaro and Challenger still outweigh the Mustang by a handy margin, but the moment the Stang porks up a little, all hell breaks loose.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Dec 29, 2009
#93
  • Dec 29, 2009
  • #93
Interesting now the specs say the GT is 3600lbs and the V6 is 3750lbs. Fords specs can't be right seeing as they say the v6 with the performence package comes in under 3500lbs.
 
S

snakekiller

New Member
Jan 24, 2009
14
0
0
Dec 30, 2009
#94
  • Dec 30, 2009
  • #94
ford updated their info
New figures:
BASE CURB WEIGHT (POUNDS) Coupe, .......Conv.
Manual transmission ..............3,603 (est.) 3,720 (est.)
Automatic transmission ..........3,658 (est.) 3,770 (est.)
Weight distribution (f/r) .........54/46 (est.) 54/46 (est.)

The car gained a little over 50lbs.

Read more: Camaro SS lighter than 2011 mustang GT!? - Motor Trend The General Forum Forum
 

acobra93

Founding Member
Oct 21, 1998
364
0
17
AZ
Dec 30, 2009
#95
  • Dec 30, 2009
  • #95
So here is a link with a supposed true spec sheet from Ford. Why would Ford come out with a spec sheet that shows the wrong weights with a slash in it and then the real weight? Doesn't sound right to me.

Still curious what it actually weighs!


Check it out here..........

Full Specs on the 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0
 
M

MeanMike

New Member
Sep 11, 2009
36
1
0
Maine & Indiana
Dec 31, 2009
#96
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #96
Do you guy's think the new six speed auto trans will fit in an 09 Stang?
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Jan 1, 2010
#97
  • Jan 1, 2010
  • #97
Final weight is a good question. Another is just how much stuff can be carried over to the new model from the first S197s. If I decide to trade mine in for a new 5.0 it would be nice to know how much stuff I can take off my car and install in the new one. There's no sense in buying the same mods over and wasting a ton of cash in the process.
 

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
Jan 1, 2010
#98
  • Jan 1, 2010
  • #98
412HP and people are complaining jeesh!

as for the inconsistant weight figures- there's wet weight and dry weight. gas, oil, tranny/ps/ect add a considerable amout of lbs.
 

blacksheep06

New Member
Jan 31, 2006
288
0
0
Jan 1, 2010
#99
  • Jan 1, 2010
  • #99
If the car weighs 36** then Ford has definately hit one out of the park this time.

The terminator cobra coupes weighed 3650 so we would see similar performance out of a stock GT. That would be awesome.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this car is in fact 36**
 

Fast05

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
409
1
0
Corpus Christi, TX
Jan 1, 2010
#100
  • Jan 1, 2010
  • #100
blacksheep06 said:
If the car weighs 36** then Ford has definately hit one out of the park this time.

The terminator cobra coupes weighed 3650 so we would see similar performance out of a stock GT. That would be awesome.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this car is in fact 36**
Click to expand...

I think it's quite possible. My 2010 with a full tank of gas weighed in at 3585 lbs. The new 5.0 is a light engine, so the only things that come to mind when adding weight would be the tranny and bigger brakes. They keep it under 3700 lbs and the Camaros will be seeing their tail lights alllll night long.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Crankshaft/Camshaft codes
  • rockinstang11
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
200
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Oct 20, 2025
rockinstang11
N
Engine 86 GT no start/stall
  • nweber
  • Jul 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
116
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
169
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
68
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
580
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?