• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Information on headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter TN89LX5.0
  • Start date Start date Mar 5, 2007

TN89LX5.0

New Member
Jan 5, 2007
2
0
0
East TN
Mar 5, 2007
#1
  • Mar 5, 2007
  • #1
OK..my Mustang has no cats and some good sounding but deteriorating flowmasters on it (and some ugly tips..yuck). In the near future I plan on doing a complete exhaust replacement. Headers and the 3" Delta Force header back system (which requires shorty headers).
My question is about unequal versus equal length. Whats the consensus as to what everyone prefers. I notice the unequal length are cheaper, why?? I know that long headers make more power than shortys. I am considering shortys anyhow as I plan on changing the suspension and lowering the car 1.5-2 inches later on and may have problems with full length headers as far a ground clearance.
 
B

BOWTIEKILLR

New Member
Nov 26, 2005
100
0
0
Mar 5, 2007
#2
  • Mar 5, 2007
  • #2
my dad bought some flowtech equal length shortys and the fit and install was awesome. black paint not so much but whos complaining. unequal lengths are cheaper because they are less material and less R&D to make them, so therefore cheaper. one big thing i look for when buying headers is a one piece head side flange, because my bbk's on my car each tube is seperate and i cant install them without tweaking the chit out of them to spearate the front 2 tubes from the back 2. jba headers are awesome fit/finish/quality, but are $$BANK$$. i wish i hadnt spent money on shorts because im just going with l/t's now because of the power increase with my new motor, so if you plan on future power, just get some longtubes and be careful over speedbumps. and what you said about going with shortys and a 3" headerback...kinda contradicts. you would want to run 3" with l/t's because a car that makes enough power to NEED 3" exhaust should be running l/t headers. a nearly stock motor with 3" exhaust is going to suck. you will have no bottom end and it will sound hollow. 500+hp needs 3" and still can survive with 2 1/2" and a stock motor for sure is fine with 2 1/2". hope this helps
 

TN89LX5.0

New Member
Jan 5, 2007
2
0
0
East TN
Mar 5, 2007
#3
  • Mar 5, 2007
  • #3
Thanks for the info! I was looking at the 3" delta force because I found it for less than $500. Hadnt put much research or thought into it. I do have a some mods planned for the future and am not sure exactly what kind of hp it will end up making. In the near future, I figure the normal bolt ons most everyone does, then some heads, intake and maybe a supercharger eventually. Who knows?? I will probably stick with the 2 1/2" then. Guess I need to do some more reading on this..lol!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Headers - 302 in a 68
  • DAQ
  • Apr 4, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
693
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2024
Noobz347
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
235
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
648
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?