• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Installed the Cervini Ram Air hood today

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikestang63
  • Start date Start date Dec 31, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Dec 31, 2012
#1
  • Dec 31, 2012
  • #1
I think it looks 100x better than the stock hood and like all the other Cervini products, fit like a glove. What do you guys think?

Stock

View attachment 136957


Cervini Hood
View attachment 136959

underside

View attachment 136961
 

rdharper02

like kicking myself in the junk
10 Year Member
May 8, 2006
703
237
84
Dec 31, 2012
#2
  • Dec 31, 2012
  • #2
Looks good. I really have been happy with Cervinis. A bit cashy, but always fits right. How did you mount the hood pins? Still havent done mine yet.
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Dec 31, 2012
#3
  • Dec 31, 2012
  • #3
I like mine, too!

View attachment 136951
 

hsean

10 Year Member
Jul 24, 2006
656
69
69
dearborn,michigan
Jan 1, 2013
#4
  • Jan 1, 2013
  • #4
nice hood i too have a cervinis hood you wouldn't by any chance know the bolt thread size to mount it?i bought mine used and no bolts.
 
J

jadigen

Member
Feb 23, 2012
132
6
19
S.Jersey
Jan 1, 2013
#5
  • Jan 1, 2013
  • #5
looks good.. just not big on the hood pins.. kinda look out of place on it..

i ran a Cervinis cowl hood years ago when i had my 90. that thing fit perfect. top quality stuff for sure.
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Jan 1, 2013
#6
  • Jan 1, 2013
  • #6
jadigen said:
looks good.. just not big on the hood pins.. kinda look out of place on it..
Click to expand...
with all the horror stories of aftermarket hoods flying up, better safe than sorry.
 
Reactions: atey950

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Jan 1, 2013
#7
  • Jan 1, 2013
  • #7
i must be old fashioned because they both look nice but the stock looks cleaner to me.

I would hold on to it and not sell it looks in very good condition
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Jan 1, 2013
#8
  • Jan 1, 2013
  • #8
rdharper02 said:
Looks good. I really have been happy with Cervinis. A bit cashy, but always fits right. How did you mount the hood pins? Still havent done mine yet.
Click to expand...


I mounted them where the rubber bump stops went. Put some white grease on top and them drilled an 1/8 pilot hole and then a larger drill for the final hole from the top and bottom. I used UPR billet hood pins. They come with a circular snap ring instead of lanyards and keep pressure on the pin to keep it in place. Picked them up for $20 at UPR.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Jan 1, 2013
#9
  • Jan 1, 2013
  • #9
jadigen said:
looks good.. just not big on the hood pins.. kinda look out of place on it..

i ran a Cervinis cowl hood years ago when i had my 90. that thing fit perfect. top quality stuff for sure.
Click to expand...

I would never run a fiberglass hood without hood pins. I've personally had one fly up on me despite being properly adjusted.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,688
234
S.I.NY
Jan 1, 2013
#10
  • Jan 1, 2013
  • #10
cervinis are reinforced to not have the popping up issue, i run mine with out them and at 80+ the hood doesnt move.
 
J

jadigen

Member
Feb 23, 2012
132
6
19
S.Jersey
Jan 1, 2013
#11
  • Jan 1, 2013
  • #11
mikestang63 said:
I would never run a fiberglass hood without hood pins. I've personally had one fly up on me despite being properly adjusted.
Click to expand...

i hear ya.. i just think a different style would look more at home on the car is all..
 

atey950

Founding Member
Aug 5, 1999
516
60
59
Southeastern PA
Jan 1, 2013
#12
  • Jan 1, 2013
  • #12
Thumbs up on the hood and the pins. I have cervinis cowl ind hood and I have the same style hood pins as yours. Form follows function...
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
Jan 2, 2013
#13
  • Jan 2, 2013
  • #13
looks great!!! love that hood i was kicking around a similiar hood called a Stalker type II carbonfiber difference is Stalker is a little taller hood. I gave into hoodpins a couple months ago also great move no longer have that worry of hood popping up and im even starting to like how they look.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Jan 2, 2013
#14
  • Jan 2, 2013
  • #14
I used think pins on a street car were not needed. Then about 10 years ago when I was going about 30, the metal hinge part on my 87 vert with the same cervini hood snapped and the hood flew up on me, damaging the cowl and the hood. I am not going to take any chances this time. For $20 it is very cheap piece of mind.

I don't have the airbox for the ram air and Cervini wants $100 for it. Anyone have one they don't want?
 

FordRacing302

5 Year Member
Oct 1, 2005
384
42
59
Cleveland, TN
Jan 2, 2013
#15
  • Jan 2, 2013
  • #15
I like the stock hood better IMO...But at least it's not the stormin norman
 
Reactions: aar0s and 2000xp8

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Jan 2, 2013
#16
  • Jan 2, 2013
  • #16
I had the functional ram air that is on the blur car pictured above about 15yrs ago. I had the K&N kit that goes with it. I liked the hood but hated the water that came in the scoops. It was a daily driver back then. I had no problems with it staying latched when properly adjusted. I would never drill a Cervini for hood pins. I would imagine it moves around a lot without the bumpers. I have a Cervini cowl now and it latches well too.
 

atey950

Founding Member
Aug 5, 1999
516
60
59
Southeastern PA
Jan 3, 2013
#17
  • Jan 3, 2013
  • #17
gearheadboy said:
I had the functional ram air that is on the blur car pictured above about 15yrs ago. I had the K&N kit that goes with it. I liked the hood but hated the water that came in the scoops. It was a daily driver back then. I had no problems with it staying latched when properly adjusted. I would never drill a Cervini for hood pins. I would imagine it moves around a lot without the bumpers. I have a Cervini cowl now and it latches well too.
Click to expand...
not sure about the OP, but mine doesn't move at all with the pins in place of the bumpers. it's all nice and snug.
i was a muscle fanatic before I got into 5.0's and to me the hood pins are a cool sort of throwback to some muscle cars, while being fully finctional.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Jan 3, 2013
#18
  • Jan 3, 2013
  • #18
My hood with the pins does not move at all.I put a small rubber washer on the pins so when the hood is closed it needs a little pressure to slide the pins through. On my prior car, you could see the front edges shake a little at high speeds. Now, this hood is as solid as the stocker.

Gearheadboy, I know its been 15 years, but you don't happen to still have the dang airfilter box still? Cervivin's wants $100 for it and i'm having trouble finding a used one.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jan 3, 2013
#19
  • Jan 3, 2013
  • #19
mikestang63 said:
I used think pins on a street car were not needed. Then about 10 years ago when I was going about 30, the metal hinge part on my 87 vert with the same cervini hood snapped and the hood flew up on me, damaging the cowl and the hood. I am not going to take any chances this time. For $20 it is very cheap piece of mind.

I don't have the airbox for the ram air and Cervini wants $100 for it. Anyone have one they don't want?
Click to expand...
I have one and you will be very disappointed by the fit. The air seal from hood to filter box is poor. The cone filter has no metal mount at all, and will be difficult to clean. There is no baffling to divert water away from the filter in a rainstorm, and there is no drain for the water the scoops suck in.. The overall design is so poor I wouldn't use it at all without serious modification. Top that off with the fact I could not get it to run correctly with either a stock 55 MM or a 70 MM 95 Mustang MAF. Both MAF's work great with a stock airbox on the same car.
 
Reactions: gearheadboy

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Jan 3, 2013
#20
  • Jan 3, 2013
  • #20
mikestang63 said:
My hood with the pins does not move at all.I put a small rubber washer on the pins so when the hood is closed it needs a little pressure to slide the pins through. On my prior car, you could see the front edges shake a little at high speeds. Now, this hood is as solid as the stocker.

Gearheadboy, I know its been 15 years, but you don't happen to still have the dang airfilter box still? Cervivin's wants $100 for it and i'm having trouble finding a used one.
Click to expand...
I'm really shocked the hood don't move around. I do not have any pieces left over. I liked the idea of the box, I loved the full throttle sound of the thing sucking air thru the hood. I hated the corroded alternator, intake, brackets, etc from the water. I actually ran the hood without the ram air for a while and it was a watery mess under hood. I felt even though the air box was a poor design and didn't seal well, the part that attaches to the underneath of the hood saves some mess from the scoops. But when you lift the hood, wooooosh. Its 6 of one half dozen of the other. My car was a black show car and it looked like crap under hood no matter what I did. I take it you bought it used? It has the under hood part but not the air box. Mine all came in a kit separate from the hood. I had to put that air collector on the underside of the hood.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Coolant boiling in hose?
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Jun 3, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
176
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2026
Mustang5L5
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
84
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
151
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
934
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
965
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?