- Jun 15, 2005
- 349
- 0
- 16
Anyone around delaware have any experiance installing a pi intake...i have a 96 gt and all the parts needed to do the swap...but I might be looking for someone to pay to do the swap... anyone interested?
you have the intake only???thats wat i am assuming so...you will need the adapter plates and the new water tube that runs under the manifold..
I have all the parts..including the new water tube..you dont need the adapter plates..you can just use a dab of rtv silicone..thats what everyone does over at sn95forums
There is so much BS in this thread, it is not even funny.
First, just so you know my background on this swap. A friend of mine was the first person ever to do this swap. His intake was modified to fit the NPI ports. I did this swap not long after he did without any adapters or extra material. I have done this swap on a few cars. Plates or adding material to the intake is not needed.
Adapter plates have shown NO DIFFERENCE in power, none, so that crap about the turbulence of the mis-match is BS.
Leaks, if you use PI intake gaskets and and little RTV on the coolant ports that require it, you won't have any leaks. ****, some manufactures have used RTV to make the stock gaskets in the past. On my intake, it had 60,000 kms on it, it never leaked and it made a trip from Regina Saskatchewan Canada to Orange Texas... The plates are a waste of money.
The adapter plates depending on the size of them and whether they are modified to place the injectors in the stock location do affect the fuel spray pattern of the fuel injectors. The fuel injector sits higher than it did under the stock application. Using the thicker plates requires a dyno tune or a tune where the A/F is monitored because the car is leaned out with the plates. I have seen this. A car I know was tested with both plates and not plates. The car had to be retuned with the plates due to the fuel injectors being moved.
The plates are a waste of time and money. I have done the swap. It is threads like this that where there is a tonne of misinformation given that gives Stangnet a bad name.
How would an adaptor plate create EGR issues?
The plates are a waste of time and money. I have done the swap. It is threads like this that where there is a tonne of misinformation given that gives Stangnet a bad name.
ok...its been decided the best way to go is rtv...now how about someone installing them near me....anyone in delaware, maryland, pa?
There is so much BS in this thread, it is not even funny.
First, just so you know my background on this swap. A friend of mine was the first person ever to do this swap. His intake was modified to fit the NPI ports. I did this swap not long after he did without any adapters or extra material. I have done this swap on a few cars. Plates or adding material to the intake is not needed.
Adapter plates have shown NO DIFFERENCE in power, none, so that crap about the turbulence of the mis-match is BS.
Leaks, if you use PI intake gaskets and and little RTV on the coolant ports that require it, you won't have any leaks. ****, some manufactures have used RTV to make the stock gaskets in the past. On my intake, it had 60,000 kms on it, it never leaked and it made a trip from Regina Saskatchewan Canada to Orange Texas... The plates are a waste of money.
The adapter plates depending on the size of them and whether they are modified to place the injectors in the stock location do affect the fuel spray pattern of the fuel injectors. The fuel injector sits higher than it did under the stock application. Using the thicker plates requires a dyno tune or a tune where the A/F is monitored because the car is leaned out with the plates. I have seen this. A car I know was tested with both plates and not plates. The car had to be retuned with the plates due to the fuel injectors being moved.
The plates are a waste of time and money. I have done the swap. It is threads like this that where there is a tonne of misinformation given that gives Stangnet a bad name.
I dont understand the numbers on your chart...would more cfm be better?...so why is a non pi head in the first one so much higher then the ones with the pi intake? its like 176 and 100 compared to 126 and 70 whats up with those numbers?...