• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Intake from a 91 F-150 5.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Distortion 5.0
  • Start date Start date Jul 18, 2007

Distortion 5.0

New Member
Jul 8, 2005
114
0
0
Jul 18, 2007
#1
  • Jul 18, 2007
  • #1
So, I drove my mothers 91 F-150 a few weeks ago, and I was pissed.

That pick-up truck was SIGNIFIGANTLY more powerful than my thunderbird.

It had the power to sling all the body weight onto the back wheels instantly.

My mother says that the transmission has been modifyed with a towing gear.
I'm sure that probably has something to do with it.
1st gear redlined at 40 instead of 55 like my T-bird.

My T-bird is also a 91.

Now, another thing I have noticed about this truck, is it's MASSIVE intake w/ it's dual throttle plates.
And I can't help but wonder, "Does that make it more powerful?"
Now, I already know that in order to install one of those on my Bird, I will have to cowel the hood, my question here is,

Does anyone know or think it will be worth it?
That intake looks mean, but does it really flow better?

The only non-hood issues I can think of is just gonna be the sensors and duct work.
I'm thinking I can get the sensors to work, and the ducts will just be a space issue.

My Biggest concern is getting the MAF sensor working right. I'll probably have to use one from the donor.


So, any opinions?
 

maxine-70

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 27, 2003
273
1
18
louisville, ky
Jul 18, 2007
#2
  • Jul 18, 2007
  • #2
the truck intake IS gonna be slightly better for torque. but i imagine the power difference you noticed was more in gearing than anything else. your t-bird i likely a 3.08 or so on the gears and the truck is likely 3.55 or so. you want similar performance, try a gear swap first. if you still want an intake, buy an aftermarket bolt on. or, if youre cheap like me, go to a junkyard and buy yourself an explorer intake
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jul 18, 2007
#3
  • Jul 18, 2007
  • #3
you'd be better off with an HO conversion. the truck lower intake exit at the head flange is tiny - the truck intake is built for low-mid range torque, but the HO conversion would be much easier.
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
33
69
East Hartford, CT
Jul 18, 2007
#4
  • Jul 18, 2007
  • #4
91 Tbirds had the HO model.

Best thing you can do intake wise without modifying the hood is a 94-95 cobra intake.
 

Distortion 5.0

New Member
Jul 8, 2005
114
0
0
Jul 18, 2007
#5
  • Jul 18, 2007
  • #5
tmoss said:
you'd be better off with an HO conversion. the truck lower intake exit at the head flange is tiny - the truck intake is built for low-mid range torque, but the HO conversion would be much easier.
Click to expand...

My intake already has an "HO" badge. Is that what you are referring to?
I've noticed that mustang 5.0's seem to have a different intake.

When I first saw this one I thought it was an aftermarket.
(I had an 89 GT before this, and it had a different intake)
Mine seems to look more "cooling fin-ey"
The Mustang style one looks a little bigger than mine.

Oh well, thanks for the info!
I might look into that rear end swap.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jul 18, 2007
#6
  • Jul 18, 2007
  • #6
Kumm3 said:
91 Tbirds had the HO model.

Best thing you can do intake wise without modifying the hood is a 94-95 cobra intake.
Click to expand...

he has the SN version - I was reffering to the Fox version if he is considering a cowl hood anyway. You can get 65 or 70mm Tbs on the Fox version.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Jul 18, 2007
#7
  • Jul 18, 2007
  • #7
Distortion 5.0 said:
So, I drove my mothers 91 F-150 a few weeks ago, and I was pissed.

My Biggest concern is getting the MAF sensor working right. I'll probably have to use one from the donor.
Click to expand...

Your mother's truck is Speed Density and as such it doesn't have a MAF.

I had read some time ago that the non-Mustang HO intakes were shorter than the Mustang intakes. The lower is the same so you should be able to swap in a Mustang upper.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Engine 1987 5.0 HO vacuum hose locations
  • harryhaber
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
502
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2025
limp
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
206
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
The Dilemma! 1988 LX 5.0
  • TTSaleen
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
336
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
Noobz347
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
285
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
R
For Sale 91 Foxbody [cobra clone] 100,??? Miles
  • Rabid fox
  • May 13, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
916
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2025
Nostang25
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?