• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

intake plenum Which one?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat82284
  • Start date Start date Aug 25, 2005

Which intake plenum is better for performance?

  • C&L Plenum

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • Trick Flow Plenum

    Votes: 3 50.0%

  • Total voters
    6
M

mat82284

Member
Jul 31, 2003
889
1
16
Aug 25, 2005
#1
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #1
ok i bought a superchips programer and a 70mm ford racing tb. now im looking for a intake plenum i can get the C&L or the Trickflow plenum but which one is better? is there any gain between the 2? which one would you choose?
 
H

Hornetsnest

New Member
Jul 9, 2005
150
0
0
San Diego, CA
Aug 25, 2005
#2
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #2
Not to fear...someone will link the battle of the plenums part II (the one with the trickflow) for you...
 

todd4566

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,075
0
36
California
Aug 25, 2005
#3
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #3
I'm not voting for either one of those. Accufab.

*All the aftermarket plenums are close in their provided *subtle* hp increase.
 

OUR01GT

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
121
0
0
EAST CENTRAL OHIO
Aug 25, 2005
#4
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #4
I have a polished Granateli (I think it and the C&L are the same?) with the FRPP 70mm TB and SCT tuner. No complaints here!
 

OrangeStang04

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
61
0
0
Covington, KY
Aug 25, 2005
#5
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #5
Hornetsnest said:
Not to fear...someone will link the battle of the plenums part II (the one with the trickflow) for you...
Click to expand...

yeah Buddy!!!

http://www.modulardepot.com/?show=articlesdet&aid=38

 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Aug 25, 2005
#6
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #6
Accufab for sure 75mm tb and plenum
 

joshheat25

Member
Nov 8, 2004
871
0
16
Delaware
Aug 25, 2005
#7
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #7
Neither! Accufab all the way!
 

Pertums

Member
Oct 31, 2003
174
0
16
NY
Aug 25, 2005
#8
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #8
buy a stocker off ebay and p&p it yourself. sure it'll be 1-2hp & 1-2tq less than the others but will cost you virtually nothing.
 
W

WOT

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2000
2,817
0
46
Regina, Canada
Aug 25, 2005
#9
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #9
Go with the Trick Flow. It is nicer to look at then the others and makes within a couple HP of the top performer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
431
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
506
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
398
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
E
Alternative IACs?
  • Ethereal_Zer0
  • May 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
475
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 7, 2025
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?