• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

IRS in a 66

  • Thread starter Thread starter WRXracer
  • Start date Start date Jul 14, 2004

WRXracer

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
825
0
0
Jul 14, 2004
#1
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #1
Has anyone done or heard of a old school mustang getting a IRS instead of using the solid axel..
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Jul 14, 2004
#2
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #2
Check out DVS Restorations.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Jul 14, 2004
#3
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #3
Here is the link: http://www.dvsrestorations.com/irs.shtml
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Jul 15, 2004
#4
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #4
mustang country in paramount ca. has a 66 test mule with one! Ford had six made. I think that they looked into it once more during 69/70 at the heyday of trans am racing they tested it out on the track...the cars didn't perform any better or atleast well enough to make a prodution run of irs mustangs
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Jul 15, 2004
#5
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #5
I never understood why IRS would be any better at anything except roundy round. Where you can set up the 4 corners different.
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Jul 15, 2004
#6
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #6
the wheels may follow udulations better...less axle tramp.
If you want to go real tech. with an Irs unit you can adjust toe and camber as well good stuff... I have allready slid under a c-5 vette to measure the transaxle width...too wide I thought that that would be cool to move the tranny to the rear as well as get irs all at the same time
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jul 15, 2004
#7
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #7
I've got a complete IRS setup from under a mid 90's V8 cougar. Looks pretty simple to install, its heavy though. I don't really know what I'll do with it......
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Jul 15, 2004
#8
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #8
usedtobe 67p51d said:
the wheels may follow udulations better...less axle tramp.
If you want to go real tech. with an Irs unit you can adjust toe and camber as well good stuff... I have allready slid under a c-5 vette to measure the transaxle width...too wide I thought that that would be cool to move the tranny to the rear as well as get irs all at the same time
Click to expand...

I like the idea of the tranny back there. Make more weight/room for the BB
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Jul 15, 2004
#9
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #9
I personally believe a multi-link or torque-arm rear suspension would work just as well if not better. My '99 Cobra was plagued with wheel-hop even after switching to DA Koni's, aftermarket bushings, and heavier springs. Essentially, you would be trading one set of problems with another.
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Jul 16, 2004
#10
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #10
trading one problem for another? I understand that...I have a wife. I don't need another. by the way with Irs you also reduce the unsprung weight {the car thinks that the wheel is lighter}
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Jul 16, 2004
#11
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #11
Marshall from here used a Jaguar IRS on his 66 stang... pretty sweet setup considering it had inboard disc brakes. OTher than DVS, not much info out there
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Jul 16, 2004
#12
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #12
there is a web site out there that someone has that re-creates the factory '66 irs just search more!
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Jul 16, 2004
#13
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #13
usedtobe 67p51d said:
trading one problem for another? I understand that...I have a wife. I don't need another. by the way with Irs you also reduce the unsprung weight {the car thinks that the wheel is lighter}
Click to expand...
Agreed. Hence the problem with wheel hop. The IRS did provide a civilized ride on the streets and was much more stable in bumpy corners than the live axle. Overall weight is considerably more however, around 80 pounds. That's roughly half a tenth in the 1/4.

If you are running a high horsepower and more of a straight line pilot, keep the live axle. If you like the twisties and are more of a road-racer type then consider the IRS. All said and done, it would only be marginally better on the track than a well set up solid axle.

$.02
 
6

63_Fairlane

Founding Member
Jan 22, 2001
215
0
16
Greenville, SC
Jul 16, 2004
#14
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #14
DVS is still working on adapting the latemodel Cobra IRS to the early (65-66) cars. The later cars are bigger so everything fits within the stock sheetmetal with little hacking. Interestingly, some Toyota Supra stuff actually fits.

I have seen a website discussing a very early IRS system built by Shelby/Ford around the time that the GT 350 was developed. As far as I know, this is complete unobtainium. The parts just don't seem to exist, and no cars are know to exist with the setup installed. I also can't find the site now. My thoughts are that it may have been developed but probably was scapped due to cost. Plus, Shelby was beating everyone with the stock style setup anyway.

A better, easier alternative would be to adapt a trailing arm/coilover setup with a panhard bar. This would be a great improvement over the stock style leafs. The downside is this may be illegal in most of the vintage racing series.
 
W

wildstang

Founding Member
Apr 8, 1999
217
0
0
Orange, Vermont
Jul 19, 2004
#15
  • Jul 19, 2004
  • #15
In the latest issue of Mustangs and Fords, there is a 66 fastback that a father and daughter built using a irs from a 99 cobra and 03 cobra engine. The artical said the father had the rear frame section of the 99 cobra welded into the 66. It also has the mustang II front suspension to fit the fat 4.6 in there. Very nice car, done in the black and gold of the hertz rental car. There was also a better write up and pictures in the june 2004 issue of super rod magazine. They didn't say if they had to modify the sheet metal but looking at the pictures it appears that the tire is slightly out side of the fender. I think the car may of also been in a popular hotrodding magazine a couple of issues ago also.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
What's it Worth? Cobra IRS
  • johnnyj331
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
1
Views
270
What is it Worth?!?!? Aug 25, 2025
Noobz347
J&M Products Launches New Knuckle to Toe Link Bearing Kits for 2015+ Ford Mustang IRS
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
207
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Mar 6, 2026
MRaburn
M
Looking for a passenger side AC Compressor mount
  • mustangTodd
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
135
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Feb 10, 2026
mustangTodd
M
G
66’ drum bleeding
  • Geno66
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
127
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Sep 8, 2025
GOvert
G
Rear diff rebuild opinions
  • MrPerfect2
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
212
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?