• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Is aftermarket K-member really better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dankushead
  • Start date Start date Feb 15, 2008
D

dankushead

Banned
Jan 9, 2008
36
0
0
Feb 15, 2008
#1
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #1
The aftermarket MM k-member looks so small and weak compared to the massive one on the car, I can't imagine that it would be more reliable, stronger, or give better handling. Can somebody please explain it to me, sorry for all my newb questions, just trying to get some firm answers.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Feb 15, 2008
#2
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #2
The two main reasons for a tubular K-member is the weight reduction and for added clearance around the engine. It can allow for better handling as it stiffens things up a bit. The stock k-member is really just stamped steel that is spot welded together and does flex a little bit where as a fully welded tubular K-member is fully welded and braced.

Now is it safer or more reliable than stock? Well that is debatable I'm sure. I've seen cars that have suffered front end collisions with tubular K-members have no damage. I've seen at least one that did have a crack it in after an accident.

I put a UPR K-member set up on my car and drove it on the street for 2 years. I put some pretty nasty abuse to that thing and never had an issue. That includes hitting a pot hole where the passenger side A arm bottomed out against the pavement and didn't so much as bend it.

Bill
 

Skud

Member
Sep 10, 2003
493
0
17
Saskatchewan
Feb 15, 2008
#3
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #3
I've always wanted the MM K-Member, but I'm really concerned about safety.

In a front-end collision the stock K member is supposed to drop the engine down under the car so that it doesn't end up in your lap. Nobody so far has been able to say that theirs will do the same except "Our product meets or exceeds OEM specs".. Well, what does that mean? I'm assuming they're talking about strength, but that's only 1/2 of the design.

Riley
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Feb 15, 2008
#4
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #4
Skud said:
In a front-end collision the stock K member is supposed to drop the engine down under the car so that it doesn't end up in your lap. Nobody so far has been able to say that theirs will do the same except "Our product meets or exceeds OEM specs".. Well, what does that mean? I'm assuming they're talking about strength, but that's only 1/2 of the design.

Riley
Click to expand...

I can assure you no ones aftermarket K-member was designed to drop the engine in a collision. They are designed soley for weight reduction, clearance and some for improved suspension geometry but not for driver or passenger safety.

Bill
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Feb 15, 2008
#5
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #5
Hence the reason some insurance companies have not covered cars after an accident after they saw the tubular K.

The only way I would put a tubular K in is if I was turboing my car and it was required.
 

propellerhead

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
1,541
0
0
"but what's with the but shots?"
Feb 15, 2008
#6
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #6
I chased this down before and got nowhere. I emailed three big k-member companies about and collision tests and not one response. My decision was to not mess with my k-member while my car is a daily driver.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Eastern North Carolina Autocross Events!
  • Warhorse Racing
  • Feb 23, 2026
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
0
Views
347
Regional Forums and Event Information Feb 23, 2026
Warhorse Racing
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?