• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Is it worth the extra money?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 281pony
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2004

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Oct 30, 2004
#1
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #1
im building my 306 with edelbrock rpm heads/intake both gasket match ported by a machine shop. i also have a cam thats pretty borderline streetable, so im a little worried about lowend punch.

my question is, i have limited money right now and need to do a couple more things. first is sell my pro-m mam and 19# injectors for get 24's, and im considering longtubes now.

is it worth the lowend gain for me to find the money for longtubes/new h-pipe?

i know its been covered before, i searched under some longtube posts. the result i got out of it was "pain in the ass to install, gain lowend". well how much lowend can i expect and im installing them on my engine before dropping it in so that wont matter much.

exact combo is: dss pro bullet 306, 282hr cam, edelbrock rpm heads/intake gasket match ported, 70mm tb, 77mm maf, 1.6 rockers, march pulleys, ect. current exhaust is bbk 1 5/8 equal lengths, offroad h-pipe, flowmasters.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Oct 30, 2004
#2
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #2
If not only for the sound then yes to compliment the now much increased exhaust flow..will help with your lower end torue.
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Oct 30, 2004
#3
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #3
ok, sound is always a plus. just dont want it to be a dog on the lowend.

i should probably stick with a 1 5/8" still since i just have a 306, dont you think?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 30, 2004
#4
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #4
A couple of months back MM&FF did a test of 4 different headers on a modded 347. They compared unequal shorties, equal shorties (both 1 5/8" primaries) against 1 5/8" and 1 3/4" long tubes. There wasn't 3 HP difference at peak between any of them. But they showed almost 30 lb-ft more torque at 3000 rpm with the 1 5/8" long tubes. The 1 3/4" also showed more torque compared to the shorties, but not as much as the smaller long tubes.

They didn't show numbers below 3000, but I suspect the strength continued or was even greater down low. If that test is indicative, I'd say the long tubes would be well worth the bottom end gain. Just don't get carried away with too large a primary tube size. Up to 300HP, 1.5" primaries won't hurt your peak, but will help bottom end even more. When you start to move above that level, you probably need 1 5/8ths. Any bigger than that is only for really serious hp levels out of a 302.

Just goes to show you how clueless they are when it comes to most of their tech articles - not only did they not mention the HUGE torque gain down low, they didn't go back and rerun the test at a lower rpm to see what other differences they could uncover. It's beyond me...
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Oct 30, 2004
#5
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #5
wow, 30 pounds. hell that is worth the money definately.

thanks for the info michael. i need to get a subscription again to some type of mustang magazine.
 
R

ratrapp

New Member
Apr 24, 2004
510
0
0
buena vista,va
Oct 30, 2004
#6
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #6
they're worth it but i don't think you'll be able to put the headers on and drop it into the car though.
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Oct 30, 2004
#7
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #7
yeah i was thinking that would be a pretty severe angle to tilt it. if that doesn't work, i can just as easily put on some headers after the engine is dropped in.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 30, 2004
#8
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #8
Lay the headers in the engine compartment while you're lowering the engine - once it's down low enough, hook them up - and drop it the rest of the way in. It's done all the time that way.

You don't need a subscription - I usually pick up that kind of stuff while waiting in the mag dept. for my wife to finish shopping at WalMart.

And remember the most important part of my previous post ---"If that test is indicative,..."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Head gasket port matching plus head/intake port alignment
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
469
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 12, 2024
PonyGTrider
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
585
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 19, 2026
spencergt66
S
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
394
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
797
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
51
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?