Is the TPS adjustable in the 94?

95snoozer said:
what are you talking about non adjustable

lyou can loosen the screws, drill out the holes and adjust the TPS, then tighten back down.

am I wrong hairy?
You can drill the holes out and turn it, and get a different voltage -- but it won't have any effect. The EEC baselines at whatever the closed throttle voltage is, as long as it's not waaaay out of spec (if it is, you'll get a code).

For example, my Fox body throttle body has the TPS at 0.85v at closed throttle. At 0.89v, the EEC detects the status as part throttle. And at 3.75v or above the EEC switches to WOT.

The only thing to check the TPS for is that the voltage goes up smoothly and linearly as you increase the throttle position.

Dave
 
I should have posted my results here earlier, but, using the TWEECER, I found that (in my case) I could increase TPS to 1.035 volts (and beyond) while maintaining a "CLOSED" throttle status.. There was no affect in driveability, and, in fact, I like the more aggressive "linear" curve associated with this. I adjusted the throttle position WOT function in Tweecer to keep WOT at the same "relative" voltage.. I have been driving this way with a TPS of 1.015 now for weeks and I actually like the results..

On the thread, we concluded in this thread that FOX body's are static between around .980 while SN95 5.0's have a wide range of .980 to 1.020 where you don't even need to worry about NOT being in Closed Throttle Position..

I hope this makes sense.. :)
 
HairyCanary said:
You can drill the holes out and turn it, and get a different voltage -- but it won't have any effect. The EEC baselines at whatever the closed throttle voltage is, as long as it's not waaaay out of spec (if it is, you'll get a code).

For example, my Fox body throttle body has the TPS at 0.85v at closed throttle. At 0.89v, the EEC detects the status as part throttle. And at 3.75v or above the EEC switches to WOT.

The only thing to check the TPS for is that the voltage goes up smoothly and linearly as you increase the throttle position.

Dave

awesome,

I wondered why my car ran fine at 1.256 for 2 years :rlaugh:
 
So when you use the tweecer for the A9L calibration, do u have to set the TPS like you would if you had a A9L comp. or would you not really care like if you still had your 94-95 calibration?

Sorry for the on-going questions...
 
nmcgrawj said:
So when you use the tweecer for the A9L calibration, do u have to set the TPS like you would if you had a A9L comp. or would you not really care like if you still had your 94-95 calibration?

Sorry for the on-going questions...
You do not use an A9L calibration unless you have an A9L computer. If you have a 94/95, then your calibration is for the CBAZA strategy that the 94/95 computer uses. Very similar calibration settings, but not identical. The TPS baselining behavior is a fundamental property of the 94/95 computer, it's not part of the calibration.

It sounds like you're mixing up terminology a little :shrug:. "Calibration" is just a bunch of settings -- timing, fuel, etc. Different models of EEC have similar settings, but not always identical.

Dave
 
HairyCanary said:
You do not use an A9L calibration unless you have an A9L computer. If you have a 94/95, then your calibration is for the CBAZA strategy that the 94/95 computer uses. Very similar calibration settings, but not identical. The TPS baselining behavior is a fundamental property of the 94/95 computer, it's not part of the calibration.

It sounds like you're mixing up terminology a little :shrug:. "Calibration" is just a bunch of settings -- timing, fuel, etc. Different models of EEC have similar settings, but not always identical.

Dave


Thanks for your help so far Dave, I am just trying to grasp exactly what a tweecer does when you use the A9L calibration or for my future plans the 95 Cobra R (5.8L) to our 94/95 computer. So i see the TPS "characteristics" of our computer will be the same. Slowly but surely im getting this Tweecer stuff....