• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Is The Wap Really That Bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmc01gt
  • Start date Start date Mar 28, 2014

jmc01gt

Member
Mar 11, 2010
60
4
9
Austin Texas
Mar 28, 2014
#1
  • Mar 28, 2014
  • #1
So my 01 hasn't had even a nibble since I listed it for sale, and my itch for a project has me thinking about building a new motor. Basically I was looking to sell it because taking this car to the next level will be a long and expensive project and I wasn't sure if I wanted to stick with the same car. Oh well, there are worse situations than having to play with my car.

So onto the discussion. I want to build an aluminum block to take some weight off the nose since the TT Eaton swap added a nice chunk of weight. I know the common story is that Teksid blocks are awesome, and WAP blocks are junk. Yes Teksid blocks are stronger, but are the WAP blocks really that bad? I have searched and all the information I have found is on forums where a guy has a friend who knew a guy who saw a WAP block fail at 200 RWHP. I have done google searches looking for pictures, and the only cracked WAP block out there is one where a guy over torqued some ARP head studs. There is also the excerpt from the Sean Hyland book where he says he prefers the Teksid for high HP builds and mentions HP numbers with no other validating information.

So, does anybody have any first hand experience with WAP block failure?
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Mar 28, 2014
#2
  • Mar 28, 2014
  • #2
Good question. I have nothing to offer for an answer but I am curious to know if the WAP only has a bad reputation because the Teksid has such a good one.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Mar 28, 2014
#3
  • Mar 28, 2014
  • #3
Whoever said they will fail at 200hp is mentally retarded.

Yes the teksid is better than the wap. By how much? a very slim amount. Any of the modular blocks will hold over a 1000hp (4.6-5.4)

The REAL question is, how much power do YOU want to make?
 
Reactions: Sloshstang00

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Mar 28, 2014
#4
  • Mar 28, 2014
  • #4
I'm only pushing 350 at the crank on mine but I have had zero issues. (4oK miles on the motor).
 

jmc01gt

Member
Mar 11, 2010
60
4
9
Austin Texas
Mar 28, 2014
#5
  • Mar 28, 2014
  • #5
The 200 was just an exaggeration to illustrate the point.

Ideally I'd be shooting for 600 fwhp. I figure forged rotating assembly, TFS heads, nice cams that redline at 7k, port the Eaton on my current setup and swap a smaller pulley. Add a set of long tubes and that should be well over 500hp if my current setup is in the mid 400's at the crank.
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Mar 30, 2014
#6
  • Mar 30, 2014
  • #6
Are the TF heads really necessary. Wonder if you could do the same with a good set of ported PI heads? TFs are just so expensive.
 

jmc01gt

Member
Mar 11, 2010
60
4
9
Austin Texas
Mar 31, 2014
#7
  • Mar 31, 2014
  • #7
Running the flow numbers into the magical desktop dyno they do make a difference. Plus if I'm already sinking all that money into a reciprocating assembly why cheap out on the heads? The 01 heads still have the short spark plug threads so I will need different heads anyway.
 

jetmech807

10 Year Member
Dec 1, 2011
1,195
326
164
Crestview, FL
Mar 31, 2014
#8
  • Mar 31, 2014
  • #8
When I was running the numbers, I found that a pair of stg3 pi heads with good valve and springs aren't far at all from TFS prices. A few hundred less give or take. For me, that's close enough to pay the TFS price.
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Mar 31, 2014
#9
  • Mar 31, 2014
  • #9
True story. From a quality stand point, TFS has got it hands down. Although I think later model PI heads with deeper spark plug threads can be found. TFS may be a bit easier to deal with though. Less need to have them worked over so extensively.

Which vehicles came with the aluminum WAP block? I'm thinking early 2000s Explorer with the 4.6 but what else?
 

72 fastback

Member
Apr 4, 2006
146
3
19
Hamden Ct
Apr 1, 2014
#10
  • Apr 1, 2014
  • #10
I beleive my 02 gt has a aluminum block. What does wap stand for?
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Apr 1, 2014
#11
  • Apr 1, 2014
  • #11
Windsor Aluminum Plant
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Apr 1, 2014
#12
  • Apr 1, 2014
  • #12
Week Arsed Pansy?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 1, 2014
#13
  • Apr 1, 2014
  • #13
72 fastback said:
What does wap stand for?
Click to expand...
That's the it makes when the block splits in two and the crank hits the K-member. WAP!!!
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Apr 1, 2014
#14
  • Apr 1, 2014
  • #14
Mattstang04 said:
Are the TF heads really necessary. Wonder if you could do the same with a good set of ported PI heads? TFs are just so expensive.
Click to expand...

No, they're not. I've never understood the fad with them. Are they cool and able to make big power? Sure, absolutely. Do they make any more power than decently ported PIs across 90% of the powerband? Nope. Nick McKinney did some articles on them a while ago (not sure if they're still around or not), and pretty much said that unless you were making 600+ horsepower or turning well over 7000 RPM, they were a waste of good money and likely to lose power lower in the RPM range.

On the original question, I doubt you'll break ANY 4.6 block at sub 4-digit power levels. And unless I'm mistaken, the fastest pass ever made with a mod motor was done on a modified WAP block. Just FYI.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Apr 1, 2014
#15
  • Apr 1, 2014
  • #15
Modified block LOL
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Apr 2, 2014
#16
  • Apr 2, 2014
  • #16
I have yet to understand why people continuously ask if I am running the stock block at my power levels. Stock/Teksid/WAP, it makes no difference! It is going to take, as sneaky mentioned, 4-digit power numbers for the durability of the block to come into play. I am beginning to think that people are building Teksid block solely for the nostalgia of "having a super cool Tek block). The teksid weight advantage is MINIMAL at best. They aren't going to make a damn difference in how the car performs or handles.

.......unless it was that billet block that weighed like 70lbs (I forget the manufacturer)
 

72 fastback

Member
Apr 4, 2006
146
3
19
Hamden Ct
Apr 2, 2014
#17
  • Apr 2, 2014
  • #17
Gearbanger 101 said:
That's the it makes when the block splits in two and the crank hits the K-member. WAP!!!
Click to expand...
I hate it when that happens. I'd better keep the boost down then.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 2, 2014
#18
  • Apr 2, 2014
  • #18
Nightfire said:
I have yet to understand why people continuously ask if I am running the stock block at my power levels. Stock/Teksid/WAP, it makes no difference! It is going to take, as sneaky mentioned, 4-digit power numbers for the durability of the block to come into play. I am beginning to think that people are building Teksid block solely for the nostalgia of "having a super cool Tek block). The teksid weight advantage is MINIMAL at best. They aren't going to make a damn difference in how the car performs or handles.

.......unless it was that billet block that weighed like 70lbs (I forget the manufacturer)
Click to expand...

It's because there likely just regurgitating old Internet lore and probably don't know any better. They're under the impression that the 4.6 modular blocks are like the old 302 Windsor blocks.... splitting down the middle after 500 hp.
 
Reactions: Mattstang04

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Apr 5, 2014
#19
  • Apr 5, 2014
  • #19
Gearbanger probably hit the nail on the head. The phobia from the good ole' cast small block Ford block and their ability to halve themselves is what drives the desire for these blocks. That and the fact that Teksid made the block for Fiat and Ferrari or whoever. Nobody ever says anything about WAP or the trusty iron modular blocks.

Fear+Famous Manufacturer-lack of hype for any other blocks=Teksid is the cool kid in school.

But they are good blocks.
 

jmc01gt

Member
Mar 11, 2010
60
4
9
Austin Texas
Apr 7, 2014
#20
  • Apr 7, 2014
  • #20
Thanks to the level of misinformation out there WAP blocks aren't expensive. I scored one our of an 03 Mach with a forged crank this past weekend for $400. So now will come the long process of building the engine and the supporting cast. I'm already 120 ft-lbs over the rating of my T-45 and still running 28 spline axles, so in addition to the forged shortblock and new heads I need at least a TKO 600 and an upgraded diff. I also paln on longtubes and changing the catback because I'm sick of the Flowmaster 40's after 11 years of fun.

Wanting to quiet down the exhaust...that's how I know I'm getting old.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
786
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
508
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
86
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
168
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?