25thmustang said:Well I have driven a 220 rwhp and a 275 rwhp Mustang a LOT... There is zero comparison and the money is well spent. A 220 rwhp Mustang on slicks with a good launch might go 12.9 @ 102 or so. My car with 275 rwhp went 12.9 @ near 108 on 17" street radials... For the money spent, sure he could have sprayed it, but having 275 rwhp all day long is definately a better option (and then you can spray it to well over 400 rwhp).
Some call it a waste of money, but I gaurentee if you pulled up next to a 275 rwhp Mustang and raced him, youd be sadly mistaken for what 50rwhp (remember, 50 is near 1/4 of the power the car makes) really does!
onefstsnake said:My nearly stock 120K mile 5.0 put 220rwhp and 285rwtq.
All I had were pulleys and a catback.
ninety15.0 said:I'd like to see that dyno chart man...I'm not saying its not true, its possible you have a factory freak. But those type of numbers are unheard of. That means that with the 15% driveline loss your car is makin upwards of 255 hp at the crank. Wouldnt get that with just a catback and pullies.
Anyways i would also guess about 250 to the wheels for the ported E7 combo! and those would be great numbers. 250rwhp is a fun street car!![]()
any cam is not better than the stock one, it depends on your combo and where you want your power. Get a cam that makes its power from above 2500rpm's and see how much fun that is for the street. Get a cam that makes all it's power below 3000 rpm and see how fun that is at the track. A cam properly matched to the properly matched combo you hopefully already have is what you wantdastang2 said:the cam is not a great one but i got it cheap and any cam is better than the stock one.