• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

It put down WHAT!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 03GTconv
  • Start date Start date Oct 26, 2006
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
1

1965coupe

Member
Jan 1, 2004
32
1
19
Temecula, CA
Oct 28, 2006
#81
  • Oct 28, 2006
  • #81
Dan_Soprano said:
Just like Mopeds and Fat Chicks, fun to ride till your friends see you!
Click to expand...

 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,164
17,860
224
Massachusetts
Oct 28, 2006
#82
  • Oct 28, 2006
  • #82
03GTconv said:
Well this is going to make you guys rolling in a 99-04 GT kinda mad......

My buddy just went and had is brand new Cobalt SS dynoed....... 225 Fwhp...!!! What.....!! He said he was taking out some mustangs and wanted to see y lolol....Well we found out lol

Dammit!!! Dammit all to hell!!!
Click to expand...


This will make some guys even more mad.

I have a friend with a Cobalt SS. One day we were on an empty highway and decided to run it. From a 60MPH roll, we both got an even launch and stayed door to door to 125MPH. He was stock, i had a cat-back and a shifter.

Never got to do a race from a dead stop, but those things are quick. He is planning an upgrade package that will increase boost.
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Oct 28, 2006
#83
  • Oct 28, 2006
  • #83
DBMSTNG said:
take johnny who is 20 years old and living on his own. what would he buy on a limited budget? a fully loaded 225whp for $22k loaded or a Mustang GT that starts at $25k. then factor in the insurance costs associated with each. gas mileage is another issue. most, not all, of those fast 4cyls, get better gas mileage than a V8 car.
Click to expand...

this 20 year old johnny bought the stang

so many of you guys are passing judgement without even driving the damn thing, just basing it off of your single track thoughts that "anything that doesn't have a v8, with 2 doors, and is rwd is gay"

and to that guy that was asking about the rated hp, vs fwd hp; the car along with the saturn ion redline are underrated from the factory. much like the srt4, 03-04 cobra, and the mighty, ph34r for your life ls1.
 
T

thomas91169

I'd donkey punch my sister.
Aug 19, 2005
0
0
0
Modesto, CA
Oct 28, 2006
#84
  • Oct 28, 2006
  • #84
BlackArtemis said:
I still find it ****ty an srt-4 can handle more power from the factory than our blocks can.
Click to expand...

its what happens when a maker builds a car right. they know the owners are going to increase the boost, and they dont want to have to deal with the damage come warranty time, when the owner de-mods the car in 10 minutes and tows it and theres nothing dodge can do but eat it.

its not like the srt4 is new technology as far as motors go either. the 4g63 used in dsm/evo's have been hitting the 500whp mark for almost 2 decades now with nothing but maybe arp head studs and a better head gasket (though the evo8 and up has a very good one already, can take 30psi).

i find it ****ty that ford cant figure out how to build motors that CAN handle that much power stock. aside from the Cobras, Lightnings and GT, every other car gets screwed.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Oct 28, 2006
#85
  • Oct 28, 2006
  • #85
AmBo said:
What is he raggin' on ***** ass 96-98 non-pi stangs? Tell him to pick on some FI stangs and see how well he runs. Apples to Apples baby.
Click to expand...

word +1
 
B

big T

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
265
0
0
Hawaii, oahu
Oct 28, 2006
#86
  • Oct 28, 2006
  • #86
Gearbanger 101 said:
Ohhhh, I don't know. I think the new stangs do pretty well with the 300hp they've been graced with. How many stock from the factory rice burners in the same price range as the Mustang can you think of that will run mid-13's or better?

The only one that comes to mind for me is a Subaru WRX STi and it's far more expensive than a Mustang GT.
Click to expand...
True, but many 4/6cyl cars are making 250+hspwr for cheap and less weight. The mustang is a good car with its 300 hspwr that can run a 13.5 stock (awesome drvr), but take off 300 lbs and it would be an easy 13.1-13.5 car on avg.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 29, 2006
#87
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #87
big T said:
True, but many 4/6cyl cars are making 250+hspwr for cheap and less weight. The mustang is a good car with its 300 hspwr that can run a 13.5 stock (awesome drvr), but take off 300 lbs and it would be an easy 13.1-13.5 car on avg.
Click to expand...
Perhaps....but it's a big car and with bigger cars come bigger weight. Don’t think other manufacturers are doing any better. Take a look at the 350Z for example. Sure it makes great power for only 6-cylinders, but it’s just as tubby as the Stang and a dimensionally smaller car to boot. Sure you're getting high horsepower 4-cylinders like the SRT4 and the Cobalt SS, which have decent power levels with lower weight, but in order for them to pull it off, they had to build it around "half-a-car". People are complaining about the S197 Mustang being too heavy and not having enough horsepower, but at least it was a purpose built car with its own platform. If anything, it should be the SRT4 and Cobalt owners that should be going out of their minds. You've got to hand it to Dodge and GM. Give the public a few more horsepower, a flashy body kit and some shiny wheels and then strap it to the most basic, inexpensive bottom of the barrel car in their line up, then give it a new name...all while charged buyers twice the price for it. And on top of that have they've convinced potential owners to feel good about it. Now that's marketing strategy!

If Ford wanted to make the car lighter, they could have easily made it a mid-size, or compact car like many of the rice burners you see out there, but that's not what the Ford Faithful demanded. The closest the Mustang has ever been to a compact was the Mustang II and everyone hated it. Sure, I guess they could have cut a few pounds here and a few pounds there with aluminum this and plastic/fiberglass/carbon fiber that, but then as the weight decreased, the cost would increase. And we all know the next argument would have been...."Damn....$35,000 just for a Mustang!?!"

As portly as the car is, I still think a pretty decent balance has been struck. Of course there's room for improvement, but you didn't think Ford was going to go all out right off the bat did you? Leaving room for more power, better suspension parts, brakes, etc is how they're able to stretch the platform for so long. Why do you think the Fox was around for so many years? Perhaps this is where Dodge and GM got their ideas from?
 

03GTconv

New Member
Feb 15, 2006
49
0
0
Fort Worth
Oct 29, 2006
#88
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #88
wow......I was just posting my buddies #s and telling you guys a little story of some races with some stangs and it turned into this...lol.......Some of you guys are just angry....angry individuals lololol
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Oct 29, 2006
#89
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #89
thi

Jackie Chan said:
you have posted in multiple threads trying to talk **** about my livelihood. what is it you do for a living? just continue being the average loser, upping your post count stategically by answering every gear, cai and catback thread in tech....
Click to expand...


I think you and killy need to take your argument to PM's
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Oct 29, 2006
#90
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #90
thomas91169 said:
i find it ****ty that ford cant figure out how to build motors that CAN handle that much power stock. aside from the Cobras, Lightnings and GT, every other car gets screwed.
Click to expand...

The modular 4.6L 2V wasn't built for boost. And at that time, 400rwhp was a lot of horsepower for a Mustang. The 03/04 Cobras put that notion to shame and Ford now have competitiors making NA cars with well over 400hp.

I do think Ford has gotten on the right side with the 3Vs. So far it appears the stock 3V internals can handle 500rwhp, which ain't shabby at all IMO.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
252
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
570
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
C
Drivetrain T-5 transmission issue
  • Ch3No2
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
345
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2025
2000xp8
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
578
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?