• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Just dyno'ed my car!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter green_fow_six
  • Start date Start date May 6, 2005
G

green_fow_six

Founding Member
Jan 21, 2002
310
0
16
Martinez, CA
May 6, 2005
#1
  • May 6, 2005
  • #1
Just got back from Apex motorsports in Santa Clara. I did a baseline dyno before I slap on the FRPP blower this week. Here's what I pulled.

Run 1.
Max Power = 260.37 Max Torque = 300.11
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 76.70 F, 30.07 inHg, Humidity: 31%, Uncorrected: 1.00

Run 2.
Max Power = 255.15 Max Torque = 291.70
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 77.56 F, 30.06 inHg, Humidity: 32%, Uncorrected: 1.00

Run 3.
Max Power = 259.78 Max Torque = 299.12
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 76.39 F, 30.07 inHg, Humidity: 32%, Uncorrected: 1.00

I'll post the scan when I get a chance later.
Do they seem correct for my mods? I was quite happy with the numbers.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
May 6, 2005
#2
  • May 6, 2005
  • #2
Dude, you better get a neck brace or that blower is going to give you whiplash...

Nice numbers
 

dsg_gt2004

New Member
Mar 23, 2004
423
0
0
Georgetown,SC
May 6, 2005
#3
  • May 6, 2005
  • #3
green_fow_six said:
Just got back from Apex motorsports in Santa Clara. I did a baseline dyno before I slap on the FRPP blower this week. Here's what I pulled.

Run 1.
Max Power = 260.37 Max Torque = 300.11
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 76.70 F, 30.07 inHg, Humidity: 31%, Uncorrected: 1.00

Run 2.
Max Power = 255.15 Max Torque = 291.70
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 77.56 F, 30.06 inHg, Humidity: 32%, Uncorrected: 1.00

Run 3.
Max Power = 259.78 Max Torque = 299.12
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 76.39 F, 30.07 inHg, Humidity: 32%, Uncorrected: 1.00

I'll post the scan when I get a chance later.
Do they seem correct for my mods? I was quite happy with the numbers.
Click to expand...

do you by chance have the SAE corrected...the numbers you have seem to be STD
 
E

exindust

New Member
May 8, 2004
329
0
0
Moorpark, CA
May 6, 2005
#4
  • May 6, 2005
  • #4
dsg_gt2004 where did you get that pic in your avatar and where can i get more?
 
G

green_fow_six

Founding Member
Jan 21, 2002
310
0
16
Martinez, CA
May 7, 2005
#5
  • May 7, 2005
  • #5
Here is a scan of the 3 pulls.
How do you get the SAE corrected numbers?
I also noticed that the A/F ratio is a little high around 3500 rpm, is it too high?
I guess it doesn't really matter since I will probably get an SCT tune once the blower is in.
 

Attachments

  • dyno050605.webp
    94.4 KB · Views: 215

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
May 7, 2005
#6
  • May 7, 2005
  • #6
green_fow_six said:
Just got back from Apex motorsports in Santa Clara. I did a baseline dyno before I slap on the FRPP blower this week. Here's what I pulled.

Run 1.
Max Power = 260.37 Max Torque = 300.11
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 76.70 F, 30.07 inHg, Humidity: 31%, Uncorrected: 1.00

Run 2.
Max Power = 255.15 Max Torque = 291.70
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 77.56 F, 30.06 inHg, Humidity: 32%, Uncorrected: 1.00

Run 3.
Max Power = 259.78 Max Torque = 299.12
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 76.39 F, 30.07 inHg, Humidity: 32%, Uncorrected: 1.00

I'll post the scan when I get a chance later.
Do they seem correct for my mods? I was quite happy with the numbers.
Click to expand...
I've gotten a bunch done at APEX. Are they installing the blower for you?
 
G

green_fow_six

Founding Member
Jan 21, 2002
310
0
16
Martinez, CA
May 7, 2005
#7
  • May 7, 2005
  • #7
wms004 said:
I've gotten a bunch done at APEX. Are they installing the blower for you?
Click to expand...

No, a buddy of mine that is a mechanic is doing it. I would try to do it myself but I just don't have the time and he is only charging me like $300. He did my engine swap also. I'm gonna have apex put in the boost gauges, subframes and dyno tune in a few weeks though. Have you had pretty good luck with Apex? Can't wait to be boosted
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
May 7, 2005
#8
  • May 7, 2005
  • #8
green_fow_six said:
No, a buddy of mine that is a mechanic is doing it. I would try to do it myself but I just don't have the time and he is only charging me like $300. He did my engine swap also. I'm gonna have apex put in the boost gauges, subframes and dyno tune in a few weeks though. Have you had pretty good luck with Apex? Can't wait to be boosted
Click to expand...

Nice. Please give us as many details on the blower install as possible - I'm dying to do this. Your before numbers are nice, I expect youll see about 330/340 rwhp.
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
May 7, 2005
#9
  • May 7, 2005
  • #9
green_fow_six said:
No, a buddy of mine that is a mechanic is doing it. I would try to do it myself but I just don't have the time and he is only charging me like $300. He did my engine swap also. I'm gonna have apex put in the boost gauges, subframes and dyno tune in a few weeks though. Have you had pretty good luck with Apex? Can't wait to be boosted
Click to expand...
Apex did my u/d pullies, griggs subframes, lower control arms, dyno tune etc. Everything I've gotten done there has been 'problemless.'

let us know how you like the frpp s/c

wade
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
May 9, 2005
#10
  • May 9, 2005
  • #10
green_fow_six said:
Run 1.
Max Power = 260.37 Max Torque = 300.11
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 76.70 F, 30.07 inHg, Humidity: 31%, Uncorrected: 1.00

Run 2.
Max Power = 255.15 Max Torque = 291.70
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 77.56 F, 30.06 inHg, Humidity: 32%, Uncorrected: 1.00
Click to expand...
nice, although it does highlight just how inaccurate rolling road dyno's are.

Between two runs you car made over 5rwhp loss, so when people add mods like exhaust or CAI and claim a 10-12rwhp gain, all or some of that gain maybe just an error in reading.

Hope it makes some decent numbers with the blower, but remeber the peak figures are not really important its the profile of the curves on the graph.

You could always create an average in the hope its more accurate, but what average would you use?
-mean
-medium
-mode
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
May 9, 2005
#11
  • May 9, 2005
  • #11
exindust said:
dsg_gt2004 where did you get that pic in your avatar and where can i get more?
Click to expand...


he has had a few different pics of that girl up .. i think it's his girlfriend. she does have a very nice ass.
 

Kronos

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
101
0
0
the boondocks
May 9, 2005
#12
  • May 9, 2005
  • #12
MikeZ28 said:
he has had a few different pics of that girl up .. i think it's his girlfriend. she does have a very nice ass.
Click to expand...
Are you sure its not a guy check out the muscle structure i'm not sure and i could be wrong but i think its a dude
 

Kronos

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
101
0
0
the boondocks
May 9, 2005
#13
  • May 9, 2005
  • #13
I need a frontal pic to be sure
 
G

green_fow_six

Founding Member
Jan 21, 2002
310
0
16
Martinez, CA
May 9, 2005
#14
  • May 9, 2005
  • #14
300bhp/ton said:
nice, although it does highlight just how inaccurate rolling road dyno's are.

Between two runs you car made over 5rwhp loss, so when people add mods like exhaust or CAI and claim a 10-12rwhp gain, all or some of that gain maybe just an error in reading.

Hope it makes some decent numbers with the blower, but remeber the peak figures are not really important its the profile of the curves on the graph.

You could always create an average in the hope its more accurate, but what average would you use?
-mean
-medium
-mode
Click to expand...

Yeah, also when I do the after blower install dyno, you have to take into consideration that the Plenum, pulleys and timing adjuster will be taken off so comparing the after dyno numbers to my current numbers won't really be too accurate.

As far as the diferences in the 3 runs, the tuner said that heat is the biggest factor. When I was there a supercharged 500 rwhp cobra had differences of 30 horsepower until they let it cool down.
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
May 9, 2005
#15
  • May 9, 2005
  • #15
Do you have a link for the blower, Im interested to see which one it is?
 

dsg_gt2004

New Member
Mar 23, 2004
423
0
0
Georgetown,SC
May 9, 2005
#16
  • May 9, 2005
  • #16
MikeZ28 said:
he has had a few different pics of that girl up .. i think it's his girlfriend. she does have a very nice ass.
Click to expand...
haha...you are correct, thats who she is..i may post a fullsize pic some time soon...
 
G

green_fow_six

Founding Member
Jan 21, 2002
310
0
16
Martinez, CA
May 10, 2005
#17
  • May 10, 2005
  • #17
SilverBullet00 said:
Do you have a link for the blower, Im interested to see which one it is?
Click to expand...

I'll post some pictures later, you can also see it in fordracingparts.com
I am told that it is an eaton m112 blower
 

00s281sc368

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
532
0
0
Fremont, CA
May 10, 2005
#18
  • May 10, 2005
  • #18
green_fow_six said:
Just got back from Apex motorsports in Santa Clara. I did a baseline dyno before I slap on the FRPP blower this week. Here's what I pulled.

Run 1.
Max Power = 260.37 Max Torque = 300.11
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 76.70 F, 30.07 inHg, Humidity: 31%, Uncorrected: 1.00

Run 2.
Max Power = 255.15 Max Torque = 291.70
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 77.56 F, 30.06 inHg, Humidity: 32%, Uncorrected: 1.00

Run 3.
Max Power = 259.78 Max Torque = 299.12
Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 76.39 F, 30.07 inHg, Humidity: 32%, Uncorrected: 1.00

I'll post the scan when I get a chance later.
Do they seem correct for my mods? I was quite happy with the numbers.
Click to expand...

Good n/a numbers but don't expect too much from frpp blower. You might get disapointed with you next dyno numbers...
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
May 10, 2005
#19
  • May 10, 2005
  • #19
00s281sc368 said:
Good n/a numbers but don't expect too much from frpp blower. You might get disapointed with you next dyno numbers...
Click to expand...
although the roots blower won't yeild the biggest gains it will provide more power, but more importantly it will provide a LOT more power down low.

Don't compare peak numbers as that is only one point in the rev range and cars have gears to make use of the entire rev range, the profile of the torque curve, ie where it makes its power is what needs to be compared.
 
G

Guyfoxbody

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
73
0
0
May 11, 2005
#20
  • May 11, 2005
  • #20
dsg_gt2004 said:
haha...you are correct, thats who she is..i may post a fullsize pic some time soon...
Click to expand...

That ass is world class!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?