• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Just Getting Started

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mindcrime
  • Start date Start date Aug 4, 2011

Mindcrime

New Member
Aug 4, 2011
30
0
0
Baytown, Texas
Aug 4, 2011
#1
  • Aug 4, 2011
  • #1
Hello everyone, I am brand new to the forum and I just got my car a few weeks ago. It's a 2004 gt, bone stock w 28,000 original miles. I figure it to be around 220 rwhp as is at most... I have read alot of posts about bolt-ons and looked at the numbers generated from the obvious ones. I am not impressed enough to spend a few thousand on the basic stuff and wonder if it would be best to start internally instead? Crank, pistons, rods, cams, and heads. Or is it best to just buy a blueprinted long block? I want to start at around 400 hp with the flexibility to add a supercharger down the road. I just got outrun by a frickin GTi Volkswagen for cryin out loud... this is not supposed to happen to a car with the pedigree of a Mustang. I refuse to stand by and let such an atrocity go with no action whatsoever. Even if this guy had major cash in this car it should not outrun a Mustang. Perhaps it is my fault for settling on a stock gt, but even so I am in shock that something like that can happen at all. My 90' lx coupe would outrun this thing, and I do not understand how that is. I love this bodystyle but, these mod motors are not what I thought they were. Is it just the 2v? And before someone tells me to just buy a coyote and do a swap, I can only drop about $4500 initially, and add on every 6-8 months. I prefer n/a, but at some point I will have to go SC to keep up, and keep my daily driver... any legit ideas?
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Aug 5, 2011
#2
  • Aug 5, 2011
  • #2
Your car isn't running right. I've never had any problem putting GTI's in their place, even when I only had a cat-back exhaust. Instead of worrying about mods, I'd worry about getting the car running correctly.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 5, 2011
#3
  • Aug 5, 2011
  • #3
Is it an auto or manual?
 

Mindcrime

New Member
Aug 4, 2011
30
0
0
Baytown, Texas
Aug 5, 2011
#4
  • Aug 5, 2011
  • #4
Manual
 

LastCallRacing

Premium Sponsor
Dec 4, 2008
172
1
19
San Diego, CA
Aug 5, 2011
#5
  • Aug 5, 2011
  • #5
You never know what that GTi had in it. If he was running upgraded turbo and/or high boost, they can potentially be quick. Quick being relative to a bone stock GT that is.

Don't be too upset though, there are plenty of mods available for you to get much faster.

An intercooled supercharger kit is a quick way to get 400rwhp. You can put one on a stock engine as long as there are no problems with the engine as it is.
 

Mindcrime

New Member
Aug 4, 2011
30
0
0
Baytown, Texas
Aug 5, 2011
#6
  • Aug 5, 2011
  • #6
Well you are right, it could have been a beast... I definitely do not want a supercharger on this stock motor. It would be a gamble in my opinion to do that. I need internals, and heads, plus a few suspension and handling upgrades first. I really wish I could get 400 rwhp outta this thing naturally aspirated without killing myself on mpg and daily drivability... I have even considered getting rid of this car and going to the Fox body cars again. They are so much better in my opinion.
 
8

88gt88

Member
Jun 4, 2007
37
0
6
Aug 5, 2011
#7
  • Aug 5, 2011
  • #7
Its not always about power. I had a bone stock 2000 gt five speed. I put a slp catback on it and nitto drag radials and ran a 13.9 at 99 at the track with only a 2.1 60ft. I shifted the hell out of the thing. Everyone told me mid 14 sec car. Under the hood is untouched, everything is motorcraft down to the air filter and plugs. Im gonna focus on suspension and gearing first. That seems to be the best bang for the buck.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Aug 5, 2011
#8
  • Aug 5, 2011
  • #8
My daily is a 2002 1.8T GTI. With the stock turbo and a "chip" that ups boost into the 20psi range, you can get a decently quick little car with short legs. However, if you step up to a GT35R or a similar "big turbo" you can easily get to 300HP at the wheels on the stock internals. Upgrade the rods (pistons and crank stay the same) and 400+ wheel HP are not out of the question. Turbos are the great equalizer for small engines.

A bone-stock PI Mustang GT will make 220-230 at the wheels (less if it's an automatic). It wouldn't take much modifying to get a 1.8T or newer 2.0T GTI to beat a stock MGT.

Don't bother trying to build a 400rwHP normally aspirated engine. You're working with only 281 cubic inches and to move that sort of air without external assistance you'll need lots of RPM and lots of compression. To get there you'll need far more money than a blower would cost and the resulting compression ratio would not be blower-friendly later.

My recommendation is to put your money into a blower on the stock shortblock. I've got a KB 1.7 on mine at ~9psi and am making ~400 at the wheels. It's pretty reliable -- many people have similar setups -- with a conservative tune and I didn't need to open up the engine at all (although it does have Comp 262AH cams from my pre-blower days...)

If I hurt the engine most likely I'd get a shortblock specifically built for blower (read "a blower-friendly compression ratio using forged pistons and H-beams..."). With a high-compression normally-aspirated shortblock you're going to have detonation issues on pump gas with a blower in the future.

I can't speak for others but to me 400HP at the wheels is plenty for a street-driven car. I know the common wisdom is to shoot for the moon and to emulate the Streetfire "heroes" but the fact is that you can easily get yourself into plenty of trouble with "only" 400 on city streets. And the car is plenty of fun, gets sideways in 2nd and 3rd already etc etc. When HP levels start escalating you'll find the expenses do too: fuel system, chassis, suspension, driveline etc etc...everything will start to need upgrading.

So I think the sensible approach is to shelve the 400HP n/a target, put a blower on the stock s/b and enjoy it. But that's just me
 

1fun281

Member
Mar 16, 2009
438
8
19
Atlanta Georgia
Aug 5, 2011
#9
  • Aug 5, 2011
  • #9
My bone stock 99 went 13.8 at 99 with some mckey thompsons, theyre not mid 14 second cars at all, that being said your best bet would be for n/a stock motor long tubes full suspension, ported heads a good set of cams and a mean gear meaning 4.30+ and a dyno tune moving the limiter to about 6800 rpms, and shifting the brains out of it at the track, that will be your best bet on leaving the stock motor N/A

Or could just buy a vortech and some 3.73's, suspension and long tubes, and enjoy life! Haha plenty of routes you can take with a mod motor
Just remember they love rpms!
 

Mindcrime

New Member
Aug 4, 2011
30
0
0
Baytown, Texas
Aug 5, 2011
#10
  • Aug 5, 2011
  • #10
trinity_gt said:
My daily is a 2002 1.8T GTI. With the stock turbo and a "chip" that ups boost into the 20psi range, you can get a decently quick little car with short legs. However, if you step up to a GT35R or a similar "big turbo" you can easily get to 300HP at the wheels on the stock internals. Upgrade the rods (pistons and crank stay the same) and 400+ wheel HP are not out of the question. Turbos are the great equalizer for small engines.

A bone-stock PI Mustang GT will make 220-230 at the wheels (less if it's an automatic). It wouldn't take much modifying to get a 1.8T or newer 2.0T GTI to beat a stock MGT.

Don't bother trying to build a 400rwHP normally aspirated engine. You're working with only 281 cubic inches and to move that sort of air without external assistance you'll need lots of RPM and lots of compression. To get there you'll need far more money than a blower would cost and the resulting compression ratio would not be blower-friendly later.

My recommendation is to put your money into a blower on the stock shortblock. I've got a KB 1.7 on mine at ~9psi and am making ~400 at the wheels. It's pretty reliable -- many people have similar setups -- with a conservative tune and I didn't need to open up the engine at all (although it does have Comp 262AH cams from my pre-blower days...)

If I hurt the engine most likely I'd get a shortblock specifically built for blower (read "a blower-friendly compression ratio using forged pistons and H-beams..."). With a high-compression normally-aspirated shortblock you're going to have detonation issues on pump gas with a blower in the future.

I can't speak for others but to me 400HP at the wheels is plenty for a street-driven car. I know the common wisdom is to shoot for the moon and to emulate the Streetfire "heroes" but the fact is that you can easily get yourself into plenty of trouble with "only" 400 on city streets. And the car is plenty of fun, gets sideways in 2nd and 3rd already etc etc. When HP levels start escalating you'll find the expenses do too: fuel system, chassis, suspension, driveline etc etc...everything will start to need upgrading.

So I think the sensible approach is to shelve the 400HP n/a target, put a blower on the stock s/b and enjoy it. But that's just me
Click to expand...

Well it is certainly an excellent response to my original post. Thanks for the wisdom! That was very informative. Actually it is the best response I received thus far. I appreciate you taking the time to explain your point of view and giving me some great advice. I am gonna look at all my options for sure, but there are alot of things I would not consider with tunnel vision! How cool is it that the advice came from someone with the same type of car that beat me? Then they tell me how to get faster! And give it to me with valid points! That is pretty damn cool!
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Aug 6, 2011
#11
  • Aug 6, 2011
  • #11
Why are you becoming increasingly condescending with every post? Whether or not you want to hear what pople are saying, they are giving you good advice. I'm beginning to question if you really have an 04 GT and are not just a troll.
 

Dark04GT

10 Year Member
Apr 27, 2008
758
62
59
NC
Aug 6, 2011
#12
  • Aug 6, 2011
  • #12
trinity_gt said:
So I think the sensible approach is to shelve the 400HP n/a target, put a blower on the stock s/b and enjoy it. But that's just me
Click to expand...

+1.

Your 90' lx would not out run your new edge stock for stock. The fox body 5.0's are high 14 second cars stock the new edge is a low 14 second car. They have 225hp at the crank vs. 260hp at the crank for the new edge. The new edge out does the lx on the skid pad as well.
 

Mindcrime

New Member
Aug 4, 2011
30
0
0
Baytown, Texas
Aug 6, 2011
#13
  • Aug 6, 2011
  • #13
Nightfire said:
Why are you becoming increasingly condescending with every post? Whether or not you want to hear what pople are saying, they are giving you good advice. I'm beginning to question if you really have an 04 GT and are not just a troll.
Click to expand...

Well you are certainly wrong about two things. I do have the car I said I do,( if you doubt that then get one of the Houston guys to meet me somewhere to verify it.) I have no reason to pretend I own a car.. wtf? and my response was never intended to be condescending. I really do think it is cool that this person gave me the advice he gave me under the circumstances. I find it ironic that the best advice I got was from someone with the same car that outran me... if you think there is something wrong with that then I am at a loss for what to tell you. Honestly it is a little confusing to me that you are pissed cause I do not say what you want me to say. Anyway, to all the guys who are trying to help thank you, I do appreciate all your help very much.
 

Mindcrime

New Member
Aug 4, 2011
30
0
0
Baytown, Texas
Aug 6, 2011
#14
  • Aug 6, 2011
  • #14
Dark04GT said:
+1.

Your 90' lx would not out run your new edge stock for stock. The fox body 5.0's are high 14 second cars stock the new edge is a low 14 second car. They have 225hp at the crank vs. 260hp at the crank for the new edge. The new edge out does the lx on the skid pad as well.
Click to expand...

I just meant they have more potential all the way around. (Just my opinion of course) Plus parts are more prevalent and MUCH cheaper for a guy with a new born baby! It was alot easier to work on the Fox cars too. At least for me. I aint exactly mechanically inclined. Ha Ha
 

Mindcrime

New Member
Aug 4, 2011
30
0
0
Baytown, Texas
Aug 6, 2011
#15
  • Aug 6, 2011
  • #15
And Trinity, I definitely think you are right on ditching the 400 rwhp n/a thing. But I think I will get my handling, suspension, tune up, etc done before I do the SC. I also drool over some new cams, Dynomax exhaust and intake... Do you think this is feasible? And my next question may sound retarded, but can you use under drive pulley's with a SC? I don't want to waste money on that if it wont work with a SC set up.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Aug 6, 2011
#16
  • Aug 6, 2011
  • #16
Mindcrime said:
And Trinity, I definitely think you are right on ditching the 400 rwhp n/a thing. But I think I will get my handling, suspension, tune up, etc done before I do the SC. I also drool over some new cams, Dynomax exhaust and intake... Do you think this is feasible?
Click to expand...

A few points to ponder:

  • What do you mean by "tune up"? If you mean buying something like a handheld tuner I wouldn't bother yet. You'll just need the tune re-done for a blower anyway.
  • Intake: If your plan is to get a blower later, I'd wait on this as well since the throttle body may end up in a different place with a blower than stock, meaning the intake you buy may not fit. If you go centri you can be sure your intake won;t work. Don't spend money now you'll just have to re-spend later.
  • Cams: You can get blower grinds but honestly, stock cams work fine on a blower car, especially with a stock bottom end. Basically, a blower will already produce enough power to threaten the stock bottom end without the added power of blower cams. I put my 262AHs in before I knew I was going to get a KB. If I knew that beforehand, I wouldn't have done it and saved a bundle.

And my next question may sound retarded, but can you use under drive pulley's with a SC? I don't want to waste money on that if it wont work with a SC set up.
Click to expand...

Technically you could but why? Pulleys will net you 4-5HP at most. With a blower this is just noise. With the stock pulleys you (a) know the drive ratio of the blower and thus the boost level you should see and (b) you get the accessories - most notably the water pump - running at normal speeds.
 

Mindcrime

New Member
Aug 4, 2011
30
0
0
Baytown, Texas
Aug 8, 2011
#17
  • Aug 8, 2011
  • #17
trinity_gt said:
A few points to ponder:

  • What do you mean by "tune up"? If you mean buying something like a handheld tuner I wouldn't bother yet. You'll just need the tune re-done for a blower anyway.
  • Intake: If your plan is to get a blower later, I'd wait on this as well since the throttle body may end up in a different place with a blower than stock, meaning the intake you buy may not fit. If you go centri you can be sure your intake won;t work. Don't spend money now you'll just have to re-spend later.
  • Cams: You can get blower grinds but honestly, stock cams work fine on a blower car, especially with a stock bottom end. Basically, a blower will already produce enough power to threaten the stock bottom end without the added power of blower cams. I put my 262AHs in before I knew I was going to get a KB. If I knew that beforehand, I wouldn't have done it and saved a bundle.



Technically you could but why? Pulleys will net you 4-5HP at most. With a blower this is just noise. With the stock pulleys you (a) know the drive ratio of the blower and thus the boost level you should see and (b) you get the accessories - most notably the water pump - running at normal speeds.
Click to expand...

Trinity, just gonna change plugs, fluids, filters, and stuff like that. No tunes yet. I am gonna take your advice. Just do what needs to be done and no more. No sense spending money where it's not needed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
407
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
774
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
337
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
950
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?