• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Just got 3.55s

  • Thread starter Thread starter Josh94gt
  • Start date Start date Oct 3, 2005
J

Josh94gt

Member
May 10, 2003
243
1
16
Gilbert, AZ
Oct 3, 2005
#1
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #1
Well I have some good news and bad news...

The good news is that I just had 3.55 gears installed this morning. They are exactly what I was looking for. There is a noticeable increase in SOTP feel, but I still have lots of gear for the highway (I drove it about 200 miles home from the shop lol) and top end speed. I plan on a turbo setup someday, so I didn't want a higher ratio. So I guess I'm yet another believer that gears are a must-have mod. I wouldn't go any lower than 3.55s, but they are perfect for me right now.

I was visiting my sister in Adrian, MI for the weekend, so I set up an appointment and Drive Train Specialists in Warren, MI while I was downstate. They advertise in the mustang mags so I thought I'd let them handle the job. I got Ford gears, all new bearings and seals, friction modifier, diff. fluid, and the labor for $600 even. Not exactly a great price, they charged over $200 for the gears and I didn't have time to order them from somewhere else cheaper (spur of the moment decision lol), but the service was great. I waited in the shop while they worked, and the guy at the counter handed me a new copy of 5.0 Mustangs when I sat down. I'd recommend them to anyone that lives near Detroit for service work (just supply your own Ford gears lol). Rear ends are their specialty after all. Now the bad news...

The bad news is that my axles are worn. I won't have money for new axles until next week. Any recommendations for axles other than Ford OEM replacements? Keep in mind I want the same size axle as stock, I dont' want to upgrade to bigger axles.

I think my clutch is going bad also...(see tech section for my post)
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Oct 3, 2005
#2
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #2
i didn't read all of your post, but just an FYI
lower means numerically higher, i.e. 4.30's are a lower gear than 3.55's
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Oct 3, 2005
#3
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #3
ok, i read it.
My dad bought some stock 95GT axles on ebay for about $100....i think, maybe it was less
 
J

Josh94gt

Member
May 10, 2003
243
1
16
Gilbert, AZ
Oct 3, 2005
#4
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #4
Yeah you're right about the the "lower gears" thing. I was thinking in terms of numbers... But just to clarify, I would not get any gears that are a higher ratio (numerically lower) than 3.55s. $100 for axles, not bad at all.
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Oct 3, 2005
#5
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #5
I ran 355s for a few years...They are nice...amazing how they move the powerband...and 5th is actually a usable gear now...
 
J

Josh94gt

Member
May 10, 2003
243
1
16
Gilbert, AZ
Oct 4, 2005
#6
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #6
RIO5.0 said:
I ran 355s for a few years...They are nice...amazing how they move the powerband...and 5th is actually a usable gear now...
Click to expand...

Exactly.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Oct 4, 2005
#7
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #7
not sure how true this is, but i heard that 3.55's were and odd gears, and it made 3rd gear have too much, and 4th have too little, or vice versa...anyways, someone told me he's go 3.73's because 3.55's are too odd and make the RPM's weird...
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Oct 4, 2005
#8
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #8
what gears would you guys recommend for a single turbo set-up? i won't be getting the turbo until the spring, but i'm getting the gears this month, and i wanna do it once.
 

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
Oct 5, 2005
#9
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #9
3.27 and 3.55 seem to be the most popular for turbos
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Oct 5, 2005
#10
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #10
not sure how true this is, but i heard that 3.55's were and odd gears, and it made 3rd gear have too much, and 4th have too little, or vice versa...anyways, someone told me he's go 3.73's because 3.55's are too odd and make the RPM's weird...
Click to expand...

The rearend gear does absolutely nothing BUT multiply the finally drive ratio. Thats IT, nothing else. Any gear higher (numericaly) than what you have can ONLY INCREASE the tractive effort in each respective gear. People think changing the gear changes the shift point, and shifts the power band, that's totally wrong I wouldn't listen to them anytmore!
 
J

Josh94gt

Member
May 10, 2003
243
1
16
Gilbert, AZ
Oct 5, 2005
#11
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #11
Good point John.

The car runs exactly the same as before as far as the power band and shift points go. What it does BETTER now is pull harder through the rpm band, so it feels like I get into the power band faster. And lower rpms are more usable due to the increase in torque multiplication (you are less likely to stall, etc.). But gears obviously do not affect how the actual engine performs. I think that's what ppl are trying to say... And everyone here thought the gear topic had been exhausted to death. HA!!

As for 3.55 being a "weird" ratio, I never heard that before and I think it's a great choice. 3rd gear does not pull "too hard" (is there such a thing? lol), and 4th gear pulls just fine. I suppose if you drag race, you might still have some rpms leftover in 4th gear at the end of a run (meaning you are not accelerating fast enough to hit redline in 4th gear when you finish), but I don't really drag race. I would get 3.55s for a turbo setup definitely. 3.27 seems too low even for a turbo'd car. I plan on a turbo in a few years, which is why I got these. I also think that these are the lowest ratio gear (highest numerically) that you can get speedo gears for that exactly match your actual speed. Which reminds me, I need to order some...

Hope this clears some things up...
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Oct 5, 2005
#12
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #12
3.55's it is. thanks, guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
597
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
273
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
588
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
L
Is catback worth it over axle backs?
  • Lorencarson
  • May 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
694
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 15, 2025
89ripper
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
649
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?