• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Just lowered the GT, now the back sits wayyy to low

  • Thread starter Thread starter patrickg302
  • Start date Start date Oct 29, 2011
P

patrickg302

New Member
Sep 23, 2010
21
0
1
Oct 29, 2011
#1
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #1
I've got a 1996 GT. Today I installed all new shocks, struts, tie roads, and lowering springs. What I've got is the H&R lowering springs from american muscle and Gabriel G-Force Struts and shocks. The front sits perfect, but the back wheel wells are touching the wheels. I've got the pigtails of the springs facing the drivers side as this guide suggests How To Install H & R Super Sport Mustang Springs (1996-2004) - Installation Instructions at AmericanMuscle.com and the springs being installed in that guide are the ones i have. Is there a different way to face the pig tails to make the back sit up a little higher? say having the pigtails face the passenger side? or any other type of adjustments i can make? Its undriveable as it sits right now as im afraid i will shred the tires.

Any suggestions would be great
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Oct 29, 2011
#2
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #2
Not trying to insult you but, did you forget to put the spring isolators onto the new springs?
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Oct 29, 2011
#3
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #3
flstang65 said:
Not trying to insult you but, did you forget to put the spring isolators onto the new springs?
Click to expand...

My thoughts exactly.
 
P

patrickg302

New Member
Sep 23, 2010
21
0
1
Oct 29, 2011
#4
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #4
Nope i didn't forget, i put them on for sure.
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Oct 29, 2011
#5
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #5
Correct rear shocks?
Are the new rear shocks the same length as the old?
 
P

patrickg302

New Member
Sep 23, 2010
21
0
1
Oct 29, 2011
#6
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #6
With a side by side comparison to the oem shocks the size looked identical, when at auto zone that was the part number given for my car on their computer, and even when I pulled it up from home that was the part number given. Now I know those databases aren't always correct, so say if it were the wrong size, would that cause the spring to look very tightly compressed? I looked under there this morning and it looks like half the coils are touching each other on the back... Would a lower rated shock cause this?
 

slayerripkdc

15 Year Member
Jun 3, 2003
1,341
16
59
43
brewster ny
Oct 29, 2011
#7
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #7
I was looking online and had found a couple places where you can purchase Gabriel shocks and Struts for 20-40$ Now if im not mistaking that is really really cheapo stuff?!? Get some better quality parts for a lowered car!!!!! Why half ass it???
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Oct 29, 2011
#8
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #8
Patrickg302-if the new shock is physically shorter in length,the rear end would be closer to the body when installed.
Meaning the rear will sit lower then it should.
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Oct 29, 2011
#9
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #9
the rear shocks just control the motion of the car; they have little or no effect on the ride height. You can completely remove them from a Mustang and the springs will still hold up the car, so that's not the issue...UNLESS the shocks are really, REALLY short and are keeping the springs from expanding to the proper ride height
 

Maxpowers

Member
Sep 9, 2009
859
2
19
Pittsburgh, Pa
Oct 29, 2011
#10
  • Oct 29, 2011
  • #10
davis3 said:
Patrickg302-if the new shock is physically shorter in length,the rear end would be closer to the body when installed.
Meaning the rear will sit lower then it should.
Click to expand...

That makes no sense at all. No one listen to this.

The spring controls where the rear end sits. The shocks only attempt to keep the body from constantly bouncing on the springs.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Oct 30, 2011
#11
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #11
Very strange.

Is the car a convertible?
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Oct 30, 2011
#12
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #12
Mransr, Maxpowers-im well aware how a shock and spring works.
"Maxpowers"-read mransr's post,hopefully you'll understand that's its possible.
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Oct 30, 2011
#13
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #13
But I do agree,I think we need more info from the OP.
And pics would be nice.

Coupe or vert,how large are your wheels?
Do you have a ton of stuff in the trunk?
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Oct 30, 2011
#14
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #14
davis3 said:
Mransr, Maxpowers-im well aware how a shock and spring works.
"Maxpowers"-read mransr's post,hopefully you'll understand that's its possible.
Click to expand...

sorry, it may be "possible" but very, Very, VERY unlikely...on a Mustang the shocks would have to be something like a foot too short for them to compress the springs enough to pull the ride height down from what it would be with the springs on their own...

in other words, for the springs to lower the ride height the fully extended length of the shock would have to be a few inches less than the normal, at-rest length of the correct shock...so while it is theoretically possible, on a car like a Mustang, it ain't gunna happen
 
P

patrickg302

New Member
Sep 23, 2010
21
0
1
Oct 30, 2011
#15
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #15
Got it all worked out now, my spring isolators were shot, bought some fresh ones and tossed them on there and now it sits up right where it should, they gave me that extra little bit of space to clear the tires from the wheel wells. After comparing the old isolators and the new ones the old ones were quite flattened out, and that seems to be why it sat to low. And my tires are quite large in the back - 285/40/18 so that didn't help either, now that its lowered i think i will be getting some same width, but shorter tires for the back to clear it just a little more, but for now it rides good.

thanks for all the replies
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Oct 30, 2011
#16
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #16
I never said it was the problem.
Possible-yes.
Very,very unlikely-for sure.

I like to think outside the box,haha.

Glad you got it figured out patrickg302.
 

mustang562

Member
Sep 1, 2011
102
1
18
Los Angeles
Oct 30, 2011
#17
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #17
Post pics of your ride.
 

GDawg

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,469
19
68
Nevada
Nov 1, 2011
#18
  • Nov 1, 2011
  • #18
What's the product number (part number) of the set you got of H&R Super Sports?
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Nov 2, 2011
#19
  • Nov 2, 2011
  • #19
i still dont understand this. isolators shouldnt make that much difference in ride height. i have the h&r ss springs on my car and intentionally pulled both the top and bottom isolators . even still, it dropped only half an inch. granted it was on the front, not the back.

 

sonic281

Member
Nov 1, 2011
79
0
6
36
glendale az
Nov 2, 2011
#20
  • Nov 2, 2011
  • #20
how much of a gap do you have between the tire and fender cuz i just got some 295/35 18 and still have stock springs, lookin for a nice height
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Rear driver side sits lower than rear passenger side...?
  • 91GTstroked
  • May 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 18, 2024
91GTstroked
J
For Sale 2003 mustang GT
  • jimted79
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
586
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 22, 2025
jimted79
J
Progress Thread Low Mile 89 GT Restomod - Moving toward paint
  • KRUISR
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2026
KRUISR
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
Progress Thread Komo's 1990 GT - Parts Gathering Purgatory & Home Remodel
  • gkomo
  • Sep 23, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 102 103 104
Replies
2K
Views
72K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 10:01 AM
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?