KB now makes a 2.8L Blower

G

GT89Mustang

New Member

Mar 31, 2005

0

0

0

Monmouth County, NJ

Sep 19, 2006

#1

• Sep 19, 2006

• #1

http://www.kennebell.net/superchargers/BigBore/BigBore.html Can you imagine one of those on a terminator . It displaces more then the engine in my dd .

 

D

Daggar

New Member

Jul 19, 2004

3,902

5

0

Sep 19, 2006

#2

• Sep 19, 2006

• #2

I wonder how tough it would be to adapt to a 5oh.

 

G

GT89Mustang

New Member

Mar 31, 2005

0

0

0

Monmouth County, NJ

Sep 19, 2006

#3

• Sep 19, 2006

• #3

Daggar said:

I wonder how tough it would be to adapt to a 5oh.

Click to expand...

I was just thinking about that, we need something bigger then that "puny" 2.2

 

D

Daggar

New Member

Jul 19, 2004

3,902

5

0

Sep 19, 2006

#4

• Sep 19, 2006

• #4

On the surface, I might agree. However (comma), look at what a thermally inefficient pig the 2.4L box ended up being. If the 2.8 ends up being anything like that, it would be worthless to us without an intercooler of some kind (providing equal pressures and displacement compared with the 2.2L).

 

8

89white50

Member

Nov 16, 2004

440

1

18

central MA

Sep 19, 2006

#5

• Sep 19, 2006

• #5

jesssus that things a monster....

 

G

GT89Mustang

New Member

Mar 31, 2005

0

0

0

Monmouth County, NJ

Sep 19, 2006

#6

• Sep 19, 2006

• #6

Isnt the point of the larger blower, (other then more hp) is that the larger rotors are more efficent and run cooler then a smaller blower at the same psi.

 

D

Daggar

New Member

Jul 19, 2004

3,902

5

0

Sep 19, 2006

#7

• Sep 19, 2006

• #7

I always thought so but appearantly there is a bit more to it than that. The cut and angle of the blades... blah blah engineer blah.

 

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"

Oct 28, 2005

19

9

29

Syracuse

Sep 19, 2006

#8

• Sep 19, 2006

• #8

Daggar said:

I wonder how tough it would be to adapt to a 5oh.

Click to expand...

Or even better, how about a 408w. Can you say TORQUE

 

carbed87

Member

Jun 5, 2005

215

0

16

Sep 19, 2006

#9

• Sep 19, 2006

• #9

Daggar said:

On the surface, I might agree. However (comma), look at what a thermally inefficient pig the 2.4L box ended up being. If the 2.8 ends up being anything like that, it would be worthless to us without an intercooler of some kind (providing equal pressures and displacement compared with the 2.2L).

Click to expand...

very true, i knew at least two guys with the 2.4 on their terminators, and one of them actually switched back to the 2.2 because of extravagant heat soaking, while the other one blew his motot and moved away or something.