• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Keeps dying with new cold air intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter Creomod
  • Start date Start date Oct 27, 2024
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,085
21,268
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 31, 2024
#21
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • #21
Creomod said:
Brother I swapped the calibrated 30 lb maf to the new pro m and it won’t run right
Click to expand...

Are you saying that you took the sensor itself out of one housing and put it into a Pro M housing?

Or are you saying that you put the entire MAF housing (the one you have been using and has worked well) and attached it to a different cold air kit?

Once you remove the sensor from the housing it was in, you've completely changed the transfer function of that sensor. (in other words: No juju)
 
Reactions: Creomod

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,883
4,007
183
Claremore, OK
Oct 31, 2024
#22
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • #22
He pulled the MAF element out of the first setup and put it in the Pro-M housing.

If things on a 302 then just put the MAF housing and element that was in the BBK setup back in.

I have a 80mm MAF on my 331 and am not running out of air. I would bet your setup is not making the hp mine is (460ish fwhp) so the Pro-M unit is not necessary.
 
Reactions: Creomod

Creomod

5 Year Member
Sep 14, 2018
525
42
48
San Antonio,Texas
Oct 31, 2024
#23
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • #23
AeroCoupe said:
He pulled the MAF element out of the first setup and put it in the Pro-M housing.

If things on a 302 then just put the MAF housing and element that was in the BBK setup back in.

I have a 80mm MAF on my 331 and am not running out of air. I would bet your setup is not making the hp mine is (460ish fwhp) so the Pro-M unit is not necessary.lol yes brother your right! That’s what I did I figured a bigger one would look cool but I guess it’s meant for more horse power. And yea it’s a stock 302 with all bolt ons dosent make hp like your at all. I guess I’m gonna have to sell it or hold on to it till I get another engine
Click to expand...
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,085
21,268
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 31, 2024
#24
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • #24
AeroCoupe said:
He pulled the MAF element out of the first setup and put it in the Pro-M housing.
Click to expand...


Yeah... that's the bad juju part. It needs to remain in the housing in which it functioned.
 
Reactions: Creomod

Creomod

5 Year Member
Sep 14, 2018
525
42
48
San Antonio,Texas
Oct 31, 2024
#25
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • #25
Noobz347 said:
Yeah... that's the bad juju part. It needs to remain in the housing in which it functioned.
Click to expand...
Ahhh ok makes sense. Maybe a 30 lb maf pro m?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,085
21,268
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 31, 2024
#26
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • #26
If you're going to buy another Mass Air Meter, plan the whole thing out. Not just the meter.



That CAI looks a bit anorexic for that intake. IMO, it's not a good combo.

I'm going to leave this here:

Anderson Naturally Aspirated Power Pipe®. Fits 89-93 Mustang 5.0L with 80mm/75mm Bullet Or Stock Style Meters (AF-0104C)

Anderson Ford Motorsport is the ultimate source of high-quality Ford Mustang performance and racing parts. We provide parts for classic and modern engines.
www.andersonfordmotorsport.com

I believe that the one that I listed fits the C&L that you already have and get the filter out of the engine bay.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems you are trying to accommodate that CAI. Is there a reason for this?
And... It's the black one that you're trying to install. Is this correct? I ask because the aluminum piece looks a lot more robust.
 
Reactions: 89ripper

Creomod

5 Year Member
Sep 14, 2018
525
42
48
San Antonio,Texas
Nov 1, 2024
#27
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • #27
Noobz347 said:
If you're going to buy another Mass Air Meter, plan the whole thing out. Not just the meter.



That CAI looks a bit anorexic for that intake. IMO, it's not a good combo.

I'm going to leave this here:

Anderson Naturally Aspirated Power Pipe®. Fits 89-93 Mustang 5.0L with 80mm/75mm Bullet Or Stock Style Meters (AF-0104C)

Anderson Ford Motorsport is the ultimate source of high-quality Ford Mustang performance and racing parts. We provide parts for classic and modern engines.
www.andersonfordmotorsport.com

I believe that the one that I listed fits the C&L that you already have and get the filter out of the engine bay.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems you are trying to accommodate that CAI. Is there a reason for this?
And... It's the black one that you're trying to install. Is this correct? I ask because the aluminum piece looks a lot more robust.
Click to expand...
No I have had the black one for years and I wanted to change things up my friend gave it to me he had it on a holly sytemax intake I even thought changing the throttle would work. The one this pro m came off of was a acufab I believe
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,085
21,268
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 1, 2024
#28
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • #28
Do you happen to have an image of the entire setup from [before] you started swapping parts?

Also, what is the rest of your engine combination?
 

Creomod

5 Year Member
Sep 14, 2018
525
42
48
San Antonio,Texas
Nov 2, 2024
#29
  • Nov 2, 2024
  • #29
It’s just a stock 302 with all bolt ons gt 40 heads bbk long tubes x pipe that pic is the set up the way I usually run it
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1327.webp
    73.4 KB · Views: 89

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,883
4,007
183
Claremore, OK
Nov 2, 2024
#30
  • Nov 2, 2024
  • #30
Put it back that way and sell the Pro-M setup.
 
Reactions: Mac131, Creomod, Noobz347 and 1 other person

Mac131

Active Member
Aug 9, 2024
235
218
53
USA
Nov 3, 2024
#31
  • Nov 3, 2024
  • #31
That intake tube will suffice for what you currently have.
 

rednotch

I'd like to remain having one chocolate starfish
Founding Member
Aug 14, 2000
1,387
621
143
south jersey
Nov 3, 2024
#32
  • Nov 3, 2024
  • #32
Did you try clocking the meter as it is while just swapping the c&l cast intake tube? Those fender mount elbows love to act funny in front of a Maf until adaptive adjusts the idle strategy. Only difference with the c&l elbow replacing the one black section of pipe will be a bit more turbulence do to the larger casting at the throttle body if you don't get a reducer coupling, there like $6 on fleabay. The black bbk pipe is 3"OD , c&l cast elbow is 76mm ID. 3" 16ga pipe is like 72-3mm ID so its a smoother transition at both the maf and t-body side with the old c&l 73mm maf housing.. Double check no one drilled the boss on the cast elbow for a nitrous nozzle too that would be a giant air leak.

The c&l 76mm kit, that elbow pipe, and a c&l 76mm housing was designed for the stock air box, my old stock 3Olb kit has a purple sample tube. Pretty sure you have an old 73mm c&l housing though. I can dig mine out when I get some time to Mic them, pretty sure I have a a couple 73mm housings for 19-30lbs along with nos 76mm kits for 24 & 30lbs .

C&L Mustang 76mm MAF Upgrade Kit 600055 (89-93 5.0L Mustang, Excluding Cobra) - Free Shipping

FREE SHIPPING! No More Pegging. The CL Performance 76MM MAF Upgrade Kit is great for modified and custom applications where the stock mass air meter pegs due to
www.americanmuscle.com

Sell the pro- m Maf and c&l elbow separately if you go that route, they where never meant to work with each other and probably get more from them that way.
 
Reactions: Creomod
J

Jarhead67

5 Year Member
Nov 24, 2018
171
64
38
Windsor Locks, Connecticut
Nov 30, 2024
#33
  • Nov 30, 2024
  • #33
Creomod said:
I got this pro m cold air intake and switched out the maf sensor with the one I had on my bbk but when I did that car dies unless holding gas. Can it be that the throttle is a 70 mm too small for it? Do I need to adjust fuel pressure or do I need to upgrade and get a bigger throttle? I used a smaller blue rubber seal thing inside the other to make up for the space
Click to expand...
Is the new Pro-M matched with the injectors? They should be the same.
 
Reactions: Creomod
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
808
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
265
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
H
turbo advice
  • hawkinsdrag
  • May 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
493
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2025
hoopty5.0
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
259
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
7
Engine Random hanging idle
  • 706 Saleen
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
645
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 19, 2026
86HO5.0
8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?