• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

Lca Upgrade On Stock Suspension

  • Thread starter Thread starter 01White5spd
  • Start date Start date Feb 10, 2017
0

01White5spd

Founding Member
Nov 7, 2002
246
0
17
New Jersey
Feb 10, 2017
#1
  • Feb 10, 2017
  • #1
I was thinking of doing some minor bolt on suspension upgrades for my 2010 stock GT(I do not have track pack)
For Lower control arms, I am finding multiple options through FRPP:
- a basic upgraded set with just different bushings
- Boss 302R
- Boss 302S

My questions are:
1. Which of the above options should I get? Or should I get a different set of LCAs?
2. For stock height with stock springs/struts/shocks - Can I just bolt them on? Do I need to consider relocation brackets, etc...

I also am planning on adding the FRPP Sway bars as well if that makes a difference
 
S

stpete

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2015
320
151
63
Feb 10, 2017
#2
  • Feb 10, 2017
  • #2
While I think the FRPP stuff is good, I think you can get the same
quality for less money from the aftermarket (i.e. Steeda, Whiteline, Maximum Motorsports).

For your other questions, I don't think relocation brackets are necessary for stock height. I don't think the brand/type of control arm is going to matter much until you add really sticky rear tires. If you are staying close to stock, get some that have bushings and not spherical bearings. I'd look at Steeda Sport stuff or maybe the BMR (don't know much about them, but they seem to have an inexpensive product line geared toward mild street performance). Adjustability is only necessary if you go lower or need to adjust your pinion angle (driveshaft change).
The typical reason you would do LCAs is if you're getting wheel hop on acceleration. They may help with vague rear end feeling also if your stock ones are getting worn. Otherwise, you might just want to do the sways if you want a little less body lean in turns.
 
Last edited: Feb 10, 2017
0

01White5spd

Founding Member
Nov 7, 2002
246
0
17
New Jersey
Feb 10, 2017
#3
  • Feb 10, 2017
  • #3
stpete said:
While I think the FRPP stuff is good, I think you can get the same
quality for less money from the aftermarket (i.e. Steeda, Whiteline, Maximum Motorsports).

For your other questions, I don't think relocation brackets are necessary for stock height. I don't think the brand/type of control arm is going to matter much until you add really sticky rear tires. If you are staying close to stock, get some that have bushings and not spherical bearings. I'd look at Steeda Sport stuff or maybe the BMR (don't know much about them, but they seem to have an inexpensive product line geared toward mild street performance). Adjustability is only necessary if you go lower or need to adjust your pinion angle (driveshaft change).
The typical reason you would do LCAs is if you're getting wheel hop on acceleration. They may help with vague rear end feeling also if your stock ones are getting worn. Otherwise, you might just want to do the sways if you want a little less body lean in turns.
Click to expand...

Ok, thanks for the info. Maybe i will do just the sway bars for now
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Feb 10, 2017
#4
  • Feb 10, 2017
  • #4
For more stability I would highly recommend LCA and a UCA, I use CHE but Whiteline uses a similar style of construction.
 
0

01White5spd

Founding Member
Nov 7, 2002
246
0
17
New Jersey
Feb 11, 2017
#5
  • Feb 11, 2017
  • #5
SpartaPerformance said:
For more stability I would highly recommend LCA and a UCA, I use CHE but Whiteline uses a similar style of construction.
Click to expand...

OK, I see that a lot of the different LCAs recommend relocation brackets. if I change the LCAs with stock height(I plan to keep stock GT springs) - Do I still need to get relocation brackets? Or will it work well with the regular stock mount points?
 

skyline247

Advanced Member
Jul 28, 2014
816
225
73
Cincinnati, OH
Feb 12, 2017
#6
  • Feb 12, 2017
  • #6
01White5spd said:
OK, I see that a lot of the different LCAs recommend relocation brackets. if I change the LCAs with stock height(I plan to keep stock GT springs) - Do I still need to get relocation brackets? Or will it work well with the regular stock mount points?
Click to expand...

I like to reference this picture. As stated above, you don't typically need relocation brackets unless you lower ride height or want a more aggressive setting. The stock setting is neutral which gives some leeway for the tires to break loose. A negative slope is more aggressive (in a simple sense, think of the wheels having more force pushing them down into the ground) and can lead to more traction but you probably won't take full advantage of that in stock form. You do not want a positive slope because it will result in more traction issues (opposite effect of negative slope configuration). You can call and ask the vendor if there a specific reason why they recommend relocation brackets with their products. The typical recommendation I've seen for street cars is neutral or slightly negative slope.

 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Feb 12, 2017
#7
  • Feb 12, 2017
  • #7
At stock height relocation brackets will not be required.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
312
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
455
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
792
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
869
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?