• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Lets see some Pic's of your V-6 Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bullitt347
  • Start date Start date Mar 29, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Sep 11, 2013
#21
  • Sep 11, 2013
  • #21
If I had more money I would mod my old F150. But I'm too busy planting money in my Mustang. If you like what you got and want to play with it, go to town. Mod everything. Make it your own.

I've tried to mod every car I have ever owned except my truck. None until the Mustang ever showed any improvements in performance but I had a better understanding of what I was doing by the time I got my Mustang.

Stangs are meant for modding, unless you got some fancy special edition, super rare, collectible, Barrett Jackson, investment car. Those aren't really cars anymore anyway. Those are some rich guys garage ornament which doesn't ever see the road.
 
Reactions: Kilgore Trout and Tyler L

Tyler L

Member
Sep 8, 2013
6
9
14
Columbus Ohio
Sep 11, 2013
#22
  • Sep 11, 2013
  • #22
ive heard that too, do you know what all companies make kits for the 99-04 v6's? The only one i've found is TMA turbo just looking for other options
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Sep 12, 2013
#23
  • Sep 12, 2013
  • #23
03_TrueBlue_GT said:
I have read that they respond to turbocharging really well. I dont see whats wrong with modifying a V6 stang, I mean we have people modifying 4cyl civics and those are not performance oriented cars at all...
Click to expand...

Any cars responds well to FI.

The 3.8 V6 is Ford econobox motor. Bare essentials only. The same motor in the V6 mustang is also used in Fords Van line. Hell, old Ford Windstar minivans got the exact same motors. Performance was NOT a goal when Ford designed these motors, hence why they're in mini vans and whatnot. Even with FI these motors usually don't break the 300whp mark.

As far s your Civic reference....as much as I HATE Honda and all their boxes, the newer SI models will run away from stock-lightly modded V6 3.8 Mustangs. The 3.8's make a little more power but are outweighed significantly.

Those 4cyl civics may not be performance-orientated in general but they are more performance-orientated than the lucklaster 38 V6 Ford.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,977
2,959
194
Middle of Maine
Sep 12, 2013
#24
  • Sep 12, 2013
  • #24
The short answer as to "why" we modify our V-6 Mustangs is "because that is what we have" it is that simple.
 
Reactions: Kilgore Trout
M

MFCory

Member
Aug 20, 2013
12
4
14
Sep 12, 2013
#25
  • Sep 12, 2013
  • #25
Exactly Bullitt. If I had the choice to get a V8 mustang I would and then modify that but I don't have the ability to go out and buy a new car which leaves me with my V6 5 speed which I have no problem modifying and painting and plus I'm not modifying my car to drag race I'm doing it because I can
 
Reactions: Kilgore Trout

03_TrueBlue_GT

Active Member
May 5, 2010
810
41
29
Houston, Tx
Sep 12, 2013
#26
  • Sep 12, 2013
  • #26
Nightfire said:
Any cars responds well to FI.

The 3.8 V6 is Ford econobox motor. Bare essentials only. The same motor in the V6 mustang is also used in Fords Van line. Hell, old Ford Windstar minivans got the exact same motors. Performance was NOT a goal when Ford designed these motors, hence why they're in mini vans and whatnot. Even with FI these motors usually don't break the 300whp mark.

As far s your Civic reference....as much as I HATE Honda and all their ****boxes, the newer SI models will run away from stock-lightly modded V6 3.8 Mustangs. The 3.8's make a little more power but are outweighed significantly.

Those 4cyl civics may not be performance-orientated in general but they are more performance-orientated than the lucklaster 38 V6 Ford.
Click to expand...


When I was referring of course to the civics I had in mind the 1990-2005 crap boxes that I see commonly with a big exhaust and faded tint. The new ones are better yes and they have finally added a sporty model. Its just like how Ford finally got their together and starts making the V6 Mustang sporty. Of course I bet you they will use the 3.7L for as long as they can without major hp changes just like the 3.8's and 4.0's they used... Yes I understand the 3.8 and the 4.6 was a one size fits all for Fords cars in the late 90's and to some extent late 2000's where performance was not important but versatility in producing cars and saving on costs. But isn't that the the point of modifying or being a car enthusiast? To build something to be faster than what everyone believes possible or change some punks minds when you lay the hammer down and watch their faces change from their "new" sports car in your rearview mirror?... Im getting tired of all these "car enthusiasts" that talk down on modifying anything that isnt a V8 or performance oriented, yet they never turn a wrench and pay somebody to modify or build their car... *this is not directed to anyone here just a vent*

Also yes I realize I talk crap about the Civics and then seem hypocritical when I say its good to modify a car, reason is I just hate the crowd that is usually associated with those cars... The same could be said for any car but that's just my opinion on those cars. Now if it is fast and the owner is cool I will respect it, the guy took something and made it fast and therefore its cool.
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Sep 13, 2013
#27
  • Sep 13, 2013
  • #27
You're absolutely correct.

It's just my opinion. Im not saying that people shouldn't mod V6's or cars like it, Im just saying that I wouldn't. The return on investment is next to nill. Modify them appearance or suspension-wise, sure. But mod them to go faster? It's just a waste of money......and I like my money
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Sep 13, 2013
#28
  • Sep 13, 2013
  • #28
I would mod the hell out a lawnmower if it will make it better.
 
Reactions: Kilgore Trout
C

comporange

New Member
Sep 18, 2013
3
1
2
Sep 18, 2013
#29
  • Sep 18, 2013
  • #29
04 v6 comp orange
 

Attachments

  • CAM00247.webp
    362.3 KB · Views: 160
Reactions: Kilgore Trout

Chris.oceguera

New Member
Nov 21, 2013
3
0
2
De Leon, Texas
Nov 21, 2013
#30
  • Nov 21, 2013
  • #30
Just put smoked out headlights on. Will post picture tomorrow
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    622.3 KB · Views: 151

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,977
2,959
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 10, 2014
#31
  • Jan 10, 2014
  • #31
03_TrueBlue_GT said:
I have read that they respond to turbocharging really well. I dont see whats wrong with modifying a V6 stang, I mean we have people modifying 4cyl civics and those are not performance oriented cars at all...
Click to expand...
This is the same base engine that Ford Supercharged in the Thunderbird Super Coupe, that engine stock made about 225 HP and over 350 lb/ft torque. It also responded well to further modifications. There is nothing wrong with the 3.8. The main reason they had problems is from lack of being maintained and abuse. My 01' has over 152K original miles on it and still running strong. The heads have never been off of the car. Hell the V/C have never been off!. Not even one hint of an oil leak. I have zero complaints.
 
Reactions: trombonedemon and Kilgore Trout
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Jan 10, 2014
#32
  • Jan 10, 2014
  • #32
Nightfire said:
All that money in mods and you probably don't even break 200rwhp. I admire you building your car but I don't see why anyone would waste money performance-modding a pre-2011 V6 Mustang.
Click to expand...
as a cobra owner I do not understand why anyone would mod a boring azz GT... at least get a mach or a bullittt...

See what I did there?

What really makes me puzzled is young men running up credit cards to mod theircar when they do not even own a house yet... of course no one here does that lol...

I agree the 3.8 is a great and under appreciated engine.

Also ALL mods are a "waste" of money don't matter what motor ya got.
 
Last edited: Jan 10, 2014
Reactions: trombonedemon

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Jan 10, 2014
#33
  • Jan 10, 2014
  • #33
Kilgore Trout said:
as a cobra owner I do not understand why anyone would mod a boring azz GT... at least get a mach or a bullittt...

See what I did there?

What really makes me puzzled is young men running up credit cards to mod theircar when they do not even own a house yet... of course no one here does that lol...

I agree the 3.8 is a great and under appreciated engine.

Also ALL mods are a "waste" of money don't matter what motor ya got.
Click to expand...
I agree, the only reason I'm able to mod my car only if a car part fails or starts to. That's my justification, as far as I'm concerned. Wanted Nitrous to cool the engine;I saw a bottle fail and said nope.
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Jan 11, 2014
#34
  • Jan 11, 2014
  • #34
Mods are fun if you like wrenching. I encourage anybody to do what they want with their car. It may be throwing noney down a hole but if that's what you got then go for it. Be cautious though, there is a point where you may regret your efforts. If you throw the cash into a turbo build and 3 months later the the engine blows apart, you will feel a pain in your gut similar to taking baseball bat to the grapes.

I understand both sides of this argument. I tried to make a 88 Formula Firebird with a 305 "fast". It did not work. You want to learn how stuff works and make your particular vehicle, get in there and get to it. But as I stated before, be cautious take an honest inventory of what you have, what you want to have, and what your plan will be if/when things go wrong or regret may rain down on you. If your build is half the cost of a new vehicle that would meet your goals in stock form, take that into consideration.

@Kilgore...Do you have a deep seated hatred of hot rodding, a contempt for vehicles of lower status than Cobras (I saw what you did there, sidenote: guys with Ferraris laugh at all of us squabbling for more power) or are you a real estate agent? You really push the "don't waste money on cars and buy a house" thing a lot. No disrespect, seriously, just curious. I understand your valid stance on such things but on a site that's built around and sponsored by modifying Mustangs, you seem pretty contrary.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Jan 11, 2014
#35
  • Jan 11, 2014
  • #35
I do not care about your opinion of my opinion and clearly yo do not understand what I was even saying and I am not going to explain it.
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Jan 12, 2014
#36
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #36
Dang...thought I knew. Now I'll never know. Knowing that is sad.
 
Reactions: Kilgore Trout
D

Deleted member 38176

Jan 12, 2014
#37
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #37
Kilgore is the SN resident downer. Lets just move along....
 

Roanstang

Active Member
Feb 22, 2013
105
10
29
Coastal Texas
Jan 12, 2014
#38
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #38
Well, here's my 3.7 DOHC puttin down 315 hp.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Jan 12, 2014
#39
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #39
looks like it sitting still to me
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Jan 12, 2014
#40
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #40
Mattstang04 said:
Dang...thought I knew. Now I'll never know. Knowing that is sad.
Click to expand...
lol..
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2003 Mustang gt. Clutch overheating.
  • 2003 mustang gt modded
  • Dec 17, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
550
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 5, 2026
2003 mustang gt modded
G
Auto City Classics 67-70 Mustang disc brake kit question/s
  • GOvert
  • Jun 30, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
64
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2026
GOvert
G
2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
285
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
761
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
145
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?