• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Lets Talk K-member

  • Thread starter Thread starter 89oem
  • Start date Start date Oct 19, 2014
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Oct 19, 2014
#1
  • Oct 19, 2014
  • #1
Been a while, Ive decided to go Coyote, and debating k-member, my builder is leaning towards UPR and I know its a fine product. Others say there is allot of flex for "spirited" DD. So option two is MM.

Can anyone with street and rally experience provide their experience? Thanks,
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,926
21,100
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 19, 2014
#2
  • Oct 19, 2014
  • #2
You're going to do a Coyote swap?

This should be cool.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Oct 19, 2014
#3
  • Oct 19, 2014
  • #3
I have no experience with either k member. My opinion though is to go with the MM piece. I have heard nothing bad about their products but have heard a few about UPR. That's what I would do imho. Also if at all possible I would love to see a progress build thread on a coyote swap
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Oct 19, 2014
#4
  • Oct 19, 2014
  • #4
Yep Coyote,

Ya MM sounds most logical.... it adds up though a arms, coilovers and tierods, cc plates to make it work....

I have a well respected shop that does allot of modular swaps and did one of the early coyotes, so Im psyched and not crazy enough to try on my own

I'll be happy to post pics etc...
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby and A5literMan

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Oct 19, 2014
#5
  • Oct 19, 2014
  • #5
Swaps in general are costly.
Going straight to the good stuff saves money on the back end, trust me.

Just get the MM.
MM swap K's weren't out when i started my swap, wish they were, spending another $500-$750 would have save me a ton of headaches.
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Oct 19, 2014
#6
  • Oct 19, 2014
  • #6
2000xp8 said:
Swaps in general are costly.
Going straight to the good stuff saves money on the back end, trust me.

Just get the MM.
MM swap K's weren't out when i started my swap, wish they were, spending another $500-$750 would have save me a ton of headaches.
Click to expand...

Can you expand? Was it the install or the overall product once in and in use?
I think your Modular Cobra would be real close to the coyote in this area....
Thanks!
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Oct 19, 2014
#7
  • Oct 19, 2014
  • #7
I used an aje k member. That was one of the few out there years ago. Fitment was poor so was customer service and there is absolutely no way in hell it's as strong as the stock k member. None are other than the MM and griggs.

You are already spending a ton of cash i'm sure, especially if you are paying someone to do the work. An extra $500-$800 in the big scheme of things isn't going to change much.
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby and Noobz347

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Oct 19, 2014
#8
  • Oct 19, 2014
  • #8
Point made appreciate the frankness, decision made.

MM has to be the answer.... Thanks!
 
Reactions: A5literMan

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,172
17,871
224
Massachusetts
Oct 19, 2014
#9
  • Oct 19, 2014
  • #9
MM is what I'd go with.
 

pearlnotchback

5 Year Member
Dec 18, 2011
319
44
59
Tennessee
Oct 21, 2014
#10
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #10
Im running a UPR and have been for years. Ive never had any problems
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby and Sharad

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Oct 21, 2014
#11
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #11
I've seen a lot of debate on this subject over the years. It seems MM offers the ability to adjust centerline of the front wheel greatly improving handling in the corners, whereas last I heard the upr unit is/was non adjustable and is/was solely designed for straight line use. In fact several members in the past attested to damage, ie cracked weld on upr k members after subjecting them to hard cornering. Has this problem been addressed? I don't know, maybe someone else can chime in..
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Oct 21, 2014
#12
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #12
Having seen UPR, Team Z and Racecraft K-members with my own eyes, I would pick the racecraft for a street strip car every time.

Considering it sounds like you are going to be using this for more than just putting around on the street and the occasional 1320 blast, i would say go with the maximum motorsport one. Their stuff is excellent and i think being a road race company means the thing will stand up to just about any kind of abuse you are going to throw at it within reason.

You did say rally though, not sure what your actual plan is but i wouldnt expect anything to hold up to that kind of abuse forever.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Oct 21, 2014
#13
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #13
People always have the money to do it right the 2nd time. As others have said, get the MM piece and be happy.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Oct 21, 2014
#14
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #14
I will play the devils advocate . I have done a swap for someone the car is on the road about a year this month . we used and Aje k member and control arms . no issue besides the control arms needed ball joints and the wholes being oblong and and AJE warranted them for nothing . Mind you the k member is now 2 years old or so . it lived originally housing a BBC we did in the car . Just my .02 cents With the Chevy for reference .
 
Reactions: AVWUNDER and 89oem

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Oct 21, 2014
#15
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #15
If you go the MM route, there are vendors on Corral.net that will get you a nice discount compared to going through MM's site. Basically winds up being free shipping. On a k-member, that is a significant savings though. I bought all my MM stuff through vendors over there. Saved me hundreds.
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby and A5literMan

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Oct 21, 2014
#16
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #16
Had an early D&D K JUNK

Now MM and only MM on my car.
 
Reactions: TOOLOW91

Sharad

ALWAYS choose the V over the P!!! Wait... what?
Jan 5, 2011
1,562
480
94
Fort Myers, Florida
Oct 21, 2014
#17
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #17
89oem said:
Been a while, Ive decided to go Coyote, and debating k-member, my builder is leaning towards UPR and I know its a fine product. Others say there is allot of flex for "spirited" DD. So option two is MM.

Can anyone with street and rally experience provide their experience? Thanks,
Click to expand...

There is no flex in a UPR k-member for "spirited DD." I drove my Fox on the street with 1000+ hp and a bolt in UPR k-member. No problems.

Keep in mind that while MM makes a nice k-member, it is heavier, and will also push your wheels forward in the fenders. Some people dislike the tire clearance issues.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Oct 21, 2014
#18
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #18
MM has A arms that keep them in the stock location now.

Lets not forget there is improved handling to be had by moving the wheels forward, its not like they did it for no reason.
 
Reactions: mikestang63 and Boosted92LX

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Oct 21, 2014
#19
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #19
I talked to MM the reverse offset A arm keeps wheels in stock posn, or I can go 3/4 or 1.5 forward with the a arm options they have on the shelf, while I have respect for the UPR line I keep hearing the same caveat UPR is nice especially for 1320 but hard driving Ie road course MM is much better. Not saying Im building a rally car but thats more my style..... I was able to talking with a few folks that have done the swap MM requires no shims for driveshaft alignment big plus to me....... I think with a vert and the advice yall and others have given "I'll do it right the first time and be happy"
 
Reactions: A5literMan

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Oct 21, 2014
#20
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #20
Im thinking reverse offset @RacEoHolic330, @GroverDill, what a arm option did you choose? what wheel size you running up front?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Yesterday at 4:25 PM
FastDriver
R
Fox Closed PCV System, Dual Valve Catch Can
  • RTW0223
  • Dec 6, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 30, 2021
jay98
C
04 V6 Restoration: Stick w/6 or v8 swap? Thoughts?
  • cojack2011
  • Aug 13, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2018
cojack2011
C
Progress Thread B4d Lx
  • Mustanglimey
  • May 23, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 28, 2017
Mustanglimey
Engine compartment Detail tips and pointers...
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 19, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 26, 2019
Rdub6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?