• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Lets Talk K-member

  • Thread starter Thread starter 89oem
  • Start date Start date Oct 19, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Oct 21, 2014
#21
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #21
Reverse was not available when I got my kit. I am running 3/4" forward offset ( forgot the name) 18x9 255/45/18
You can see they are forward in this picture. I did have some minor rubbing so I made some home made fender spreaders.
 

Attachments

  • yeipJfB.webp
    59.4 KB · Views: 177

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Oct 21, 2014
#22
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #22
Thanks! MM tech guy said had to for 1.5 and probably the 3/4. Tru Forge looks like? They sit real nice in the pic. So you thinking reverse then is best to start out with?
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Oct 21, 2014
#23
  • Oct 21, 2014
  • #23
I would have bought them had they been available at the time. My car is just a toy and I will never see the improved handling offered by the longer wheelbase. Yeah they are true forged Victory wheels.
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Oct 22, 2014
#24
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #24
Hoping you'd say that. Appreciate the help!
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Oct 22, 2014
#25
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #25
I have the reverse offset arms for the same reason Grover mentioned. A street toy won't see the benefit of a longer wheelbase. I run 18x8 up front with 235 tires. I went more narrow so I didnt have to deal with rubbing. I don't have fender liners yet, but no rubbing to speak of now.
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Oct 22, 2014
#26
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #26
I think Im gonna run Saleen SC 17/8 and 17/9 initially, I love the SC in chrome. I like the look of your Mach5s and how they sit Scott glad I get an idea of the reverse offset, Thanks!
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Oct 22, 2014
#27
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #27
id go UPR... we just smashed the front end of the 3200lbs turbo car down from just about sitting on the rear bumper and the only thing that didnt survive was the CC plates. if it can take that kind of hit its good enough for street driving
 
Reactions: pearlnotchback, Sharad and hoopty5.0

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,775
6,932
214
SW Houston
Oct 22, 2014
#28
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #28
I currently use and have had in the past UPR K members on street driven vehicles. I drive hard and have never had an issue. With the way K members in general are made now I doubt you'll ever have an issue with one short of running into a wall. It surely just comes down to brand preference, I'd bet you couldn't tell much of a difference in a 'blind taste test.'
 
Reactions: Sharad

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Oct 22, 2014
#29
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #29
Full Disclosure- I do not run any UPR products on my cars nor will I ever do so. With that said- enjoy

http://forums.corral.net/forums/gen...lar-k-member-setup-issues-2005-79k-100-a.html
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,775
6,932
214
SW Houston
Oct 22, 2014
#30
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #30
I'm not going to take someone else's experiences over mine. I've never had an issue with them in all of my direct dealings and will continue to buy from them.

The company I ordered my e-fan controller from a week ago and have not heard a peep from is a different story, however.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Oct 22, 2014
#31
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #31
hoopty5.0 said:
I'm not going to take someone else's experiences over mine. I've never had an issue with them in all of my direct dealings and will continue to buy from them.

The company I ordered my e-fan controller from a week ago and have not heard a peep from is a different story, however.
Click to expand...

Let me guess- Brian @DCC
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,775
6,932
214
SW Houston
Oct 22, 2014
#32
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #32
mikestang63 said:
Let me guess- Brian @DCC
Click to expand...
Nah, I risked it and went eGay for a Derale unit. If it's not on my doorstep when I get home, I will go HAM on the fools.
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Oct 22, 2014
#33
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • #33
Installing a K member can be expensive and time consuming.
In most cases here it just isn't worthwhile or necessary and is a total waste of time and money. Dropping 50 lbs or whatever it is, is certainly not a cost effective way of going faster at $700+. Imagine what that 700 bucks could buy for better engine parts.
Not saying don't ever do it, but you should be out of other more sensible mods first.

When it comes to a modular swap it makes sense. Clearance and making the engine just drop right in make your life alot easier.

There really is only is 1 company that is a sure bet for fit, quality and support that would be MM (not sure if griggs does swap k's but i trust them too).
The OP is probably spending 15 grand plus on this project.
Might as well economize with the best, you really don't want to install one more than once. So debating the rest of them is kinda a moot point.
 
Last edited: Oct 22, 2014
Reactions: 89oem
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 3:20 PM
GearHeadGuy
R
Fox Closed PCV System, Dual Valve Catch Can
  • RTW0223
  • Dec 6, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 30, 2021
jay98
C
04 V6 Restoration: Stick w/6 or v8 swap? Thoughts?
  • cojack2011
  • Aug 13, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2018
cojack2011
C
Progress Thread B4d Lx
  • Mustanglimey
  • May 23, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 28, 2017
Mustanglimey
Engine compartment Detail tips and pointers...
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 19, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 26, 2019
Rdub6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?