• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

long tube or short tube - what is the difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fastblueroush
  • Start date Start date Aug 11, 2008
F

fastblueroush

New Member
Apr 2, 2008
20
0
0
Aug 11, 2008
#1
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #1
What are the characteristics of short vs long tube headers and what applications are each best suited for? I've heard not much performance gains from shorties and as much as 50 rwhp with LT's?

Can you guys help educate me?


Posted via Mobile Device
 

Towelly

New Member
May 9, 2006
174
0
0
Aug 11, 2008
#2
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #2
Its all about exhaust pulsation. The long tubes are tuned to provide the easiest exit of exhaust without taking to much back pressure away. Shorties do the same thing but on a smaller scale and not nearly as effieciently. Although, without any other mods, even long tubes won't do much for performance but will make it sound much better. On the other hand if you plan on forced induction or some aftermarket cams, long tubes are a must if you want to get all the potential out of your motor.

So basically, long tubes promote scavengeing, which is when exhaust air is pulled out even before the piston starts to come up on the exhaust stroke and before the intake valve closes completely. This helps combustion which in turn increases horsepower. (IIRC)

The short of it: Longtubes > Shorties.



[/end rant]
 
P

PSYKOSTEVO

Banned
Apr 11, 2008
194
0
0
Aug 11, 2008
#3
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #3
Shorties would net you 0-10rwhp, long tubes 5-20 rwhp. But 50 is a little outlandish.
 

Towelly

New Member
May 9, 2006
174
0
0
Aug 11, 2008
#4
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #4
PSYKOSTEVO said:
Shorties would net you 0-10rwhp, long tubes 5-20 rwhp. But 50 is a little outlandish.
Click to expand...
I agree, that is, unless he had done other mod's as well. Such as, headwork/cams, blower/turbo, etc. I
 
F

fastblueroush

New Member
Apr 2, 2008
20
0
0
Aug 12, 2008
#5
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #5
Thanks guys. My car is SC'd and I'm looking for both better sound quality and increased HP.

My next mod is CAI, smaller sc pulley, new idler with a custom tune from JDM. Truthfully, I am a little concerned about voiding remaining 6 mos. of Roush warranty, but am thirsty for more HP but not at the sake of blowing it up. Do you guys have an opinion on this mod?

After this I'm doing the LT's. I'm sure I'll have to update my tune when I put on the LT's, but just wanted to confirm I'm on the right track with LT's vs Shorties.

Thanks !!
 
P

PSYKOSTEVO

Banned
Apr 11, 2008
194
0
0
Aug 12, 2008
#6
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #6
Words of advice when tuning the roush.

When you put on the smaller pulley I am assuming that you will be hoping for 12psi.

The stock AFR from roush can be leaned out to about 11.95, and then the timing can be bumped up to almost match the MBT table. You may also want to raise the maximum Throttle % at all RPMs up to 80%. When putting in longtubes disable the rear O2s, and up the base fuel a little bit (~2%). You can set the max wheel torque error to 50,000, reduce the value required to enter WOT to remove the minor delay that you'll experience in fuel compensation for WOT.

ChangeMax MAF count to 1023, and MAF min to 50. This will allow your MAf sensor to read more accurately at the high volume your supercharger will make with that pulley. Also set Min and Max Barometric to 27 to disable it so that it doesn't screw with your WOT fueling.

Change the Open Loop delay ramp to 0, and set the Open Loop delay blend to 0.5 > This will make the car respond to WOT better by delivering the AFR change faster.

Also set the CYL AIR WOT MULT to 1.9 so that your car never goes superlean.

There can be more to it, so feel free to PM me if you have ?'s.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
924
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
950
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?