• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Long tubes vs. Tri-y's???'s

  • Thread starter Thread starter ga289stocker
  • Start date Start date Oct 21, 2006

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Oct 21, 2006
#1
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #1
Ok I have a 289 w/ cearmic coated tri-y's I've been running for a few years now. They seem to work great and I noticed a power increase from the exhaust manifolds i was running both in seat of pants and et's at track. Fast forward and now I'm getting more into racing the car from time to time at local dragstrip... I've got some upcoming mod's i'm looking to make, AFR 165's, ram air and battery relocate. I've seen where many folks run the long tubes for pure performance it seems. What would be the advantages to switching to long tubes if any? Also can anyone confirm or deny the statement I've heard several times that "tri-y's are better down low for torque and long tubes make more power up top"? Would the probably $500 bucks i'd have to spend for good coated long tubes(hooker's) really add to my et? My motor is mild 289 right now, weiand single plane, holley 600dp, about 10:1cr w/ flat tops, roller rockers, stock heads now but have the 165's
to go on, mild race cam not sure spec's...runs 14.2 @98+ so far..or are the long tubes for more radically build up's, thanks for any comments...
 
B

blue65coupe

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
71
0
0
North Carolina
Oct 21, 2006
#2
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #2
I can't answer your tech questions but I'll throw in my $0.02. I was considering tri-y headers when finished my 289 build. However, I decided to go with the Hedman Elite nickel coated longs. I can send the part #. I don't know what kind of tranny you're running as there may be an issue with manuals. I've got an auto. As far as satisfaction...A1. Easy fit, look good, hang down a little under the car, sound good, etc. May not be what you're looking for but I felt like typing

Edit: you have a 4 spd, may not work. Sorry for the wasted reading
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 21, 2006
#3
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #3
I ran tri-y's on the 400+hp 331, sixpack in my 89 Ranger and it suffered none at all on top. I'd spend the money elsewhere.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Oct 21, 2006
#4
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #4
D.Hearne said:
I ran tri-y's on the 400+hp 331, sixpack in my 89 Ranger and it suffered none at all on top. I'd spend the money elsewhere.
Click to expand...

Agreed. You have them, they are hooked up and they will work fine. Not worth spending the money on unless you are going totally all out drag. The gains would be minimal.
 

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Oct 21, 2006
#5
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #5
Thanks for the quick respones guys...I think I'll stick w/ my tri-y's then. now just got to get my butt in the garage to finish my battery relocate and hook up the ram air before last track day Nov 3rd. Look out 13's here i come, hopefully......
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 21, 2006
#6
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #6
Just from looking at what your signature lists, the thing you need to spend money on now is heads or port work to your stock heads. That's your bottleneck now, not exhaust. You've got the gears and transmission to use it. Rear tires might also net you more gains, depending on what you're running now. Don't expect any gain from a cold air setup. The battery relocation will help in traction, but again, don't expect a whole lot there either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
869
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
660
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?