• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

LONG TUBES

  • Thread starter Thread starter flames201
  • Start date Start date Dec 23, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

flames201

New Member
Dec 23, 2004
77
0
0
st. amant, la
Dec 23, 2004
#1
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #1
WHAT ARE THE BETTER OF THE LONG TUBES FOR MY 2004 GT? WANT TO GET SOME IDEAS SO I DON'T MAKE THE WRONG DECISION.
 
D

Dusty

New Member
Dec 7, 2004
13
0
0
Regina
Dec 23, 2004
#2
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #2
<- green4.6GT at dustys


totally depends on what you want... is price an object?? do you want the best possible, or bang for your buck?
 

crew_dawg16

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
445
0
0
DeKalb, IL
Dec 23, 2004
#3
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #3
The ceramic coated BBKs that my friend put on his stang were pretty good quality from what I could tell.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 24, 2004
#4
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #4
Mac longtubes
 
Z

zcs626

New Member
Jul 4, 2004
260
0
0
dallas
Dec 24, 2004
#5
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #5
BBK
 

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Dec 24, 2004
#6
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #6
I've got about 30k miles on my BBK polished ceramic LTs.

Good as gold.


Matt
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 24, 2004
#7
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #7
Best brand of header by far over ANY other would be a set of ceramic coated Kooks. Only downside would be the fact that they'll run you a mint.
 

smokin'Red35th

Member
Jan 9, 2004
493
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 24, 2004
#8
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #8
Gearbanger 101 said:
Best brand of header by far over ANY other would be a set of ceramic coated Kooks. Only downside would be the fact that they'll run you a mint.
Click to expand...
Why are they so much better?
 

back_in_black

New Member
Apr 12, 2003
460
1
0
frederick, MD
Dec 24, 2004
#9
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #9
another vote for Mac LT's !!
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 24, 2004
#10
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #10
smokin'Red35th said:
Why are they so much better?
Click to expand...
Custom built for each application, Dyno proven, super think warp resistant flange, beefy construction, no fitment issues and awesome durability on their coating along with a great warranty on the header itself.

Tell me that these aren’t a work of art….


 
X

XtreemSix

New Member
Dec 20, 2004
13
0
0
Hillsboro, IL.
Dec 24, 2004
#11
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #11
has anyone tried hooker? cause i found this... http://www.lmperformance.com/3566/50.html
 

happydood2

Member
Apr 4, 2004
81
0
6
MA
Dec 24, 2004
#12
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #12
bbk i put them in my 98 gt when i put a 2002 motor in and are very nice to bad the quieted my car alot even with my offroad x pipe
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Dec 24, 2004
#13
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #13
You definately want to go with a ceramic coated header. Long tubes put the o2 sensors further away from the engine, and at idle this lets the o2's cool off some, throwing off the reading, and sometimes causing some drivability issues. The ceramic coating helps to keep some of the heat in and will help this some.
 

happydood2

Member
Apr 4, 2004
81
0
6
MA
Dec 24, 2004
#14
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #14
bingo
 

crew_dawg16

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
445
0
0
DeKalb, IL
Dec 24, 2004
#15
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #15
Not only that, but the ceramic holding in the heat prevents burning wires up under the hood.

The ceramic coated BBKs had the same heavy-duty construction of the Kooks headers. They cost $500 and when I buy headers, they are probably what I will buy.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 24, 2004
#16
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #16
You guys are forgetting the post important part. Performance. The ceramic coating allows for a hotter EGT’s which improves scavenging and flow. Not to mention a ceramic coated header will outlast a standard header.
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Dec 25, 2004
#17
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #17
none of you mentioned fact the hooker is the only LT that allows you to change clutch with LT in place
 
D

dark.stallion

New Member
Nov 3, 2004
17
0
0
Dec 25, 2004
#18
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #18
basically all the longtubes produce the same amount of hp....maybe 2-3 more for a different application...which is not much unless you're an extreme horsepower junkie....the reason for higher prices is usually better quality material, fitment, ability to remove tranny, and so on...
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 25, 2004
#19
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #19
Those custom longtubes look sharp Brain!
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 25, 2004
#20
  • Dec 25, 2004
  • #20
Darkhorse845 said:
Those custom longtubes look sharp Brain!
Click to expand...
Yup, they sure are Purdy. These are actually the T-Bird/Cougar headers that fit my car. I couldn’t find a good picture of their Mustang ones. Mine should finally be arriving soon after the holidays. This particular set runs $650.00US. (Mustang Headers should be a little cheaper, I guess )Kinda stout I know, but they’re the only manufacturer that makes a mid length, high quality header for the 4.6L Birds and Cats. They should compliment my Eaton and intake upgrads well.

Side Note
I didn’t mean to make it sound in my previous post that all headers that weren’t Kooks, were junk (although someone would be hard pressed to ever again convince me that the words Mac Headers and Quality could be paired together in the same sentence). I’ve seen and had experience with the Mac, BBK and Kooks with regards to the 4.6L in the past and can honestly say that although they're expensive, you do get what you paid for. Nobody, with any particular make of vehicle or model…..not one person who’s owned a set of Kooks to my knowledge has complained about their build quality, coating or performance. Where I have always heard mixed results from the other brands with regards to at least one of the above. You guys can take that for what it's worth.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

My first post
  • myproGTv
  • May 31, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
92
The Welcome Wagon May 31, 2026
myproGTv
A
Procharger install/prep questions
  • ahratrew
  • Nov 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
316
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2025
Noobz347
Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
45
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
Old Holley head identification???
  • Ar15cobra
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
148
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
01 GT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK CYLINDER LINKAGE
  • Scwhitten
  • May 13, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
75
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
n0v8or
N
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?