• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

lose horsepower with h-pipe

  • Thread starter Thread starter pjdellenger80
  • Start date Start date Jun 18, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Jun 19, 2004
#21
  • Jun 19, 2004
  • #21
jrc_03_gt said:
I dont need a dyno! If you know how your car drives you can tell if you lost a noticeable amount of torque down low. I know for a fact I did. I did on my 98 gt too! I must say the gears helped bring it back though. I love the way an off road pipe sounds. If you dont like the performance after the install of a off road pipe just get the gears.
Click to expand...

I was amazed at the gain after my exhaust mod. I dyno-d about 23 rwhp gain and 20 rwtq gain (peak). At nowhere did I lose torque. The torque curve was about 10-20 lb-ft above the stock dyno the whole rpm range.

My 03 must be different than your 98.

I don't know why this myth continues. I've only seen about 15 'Stangs dyno exhausts, (not "millions", but keep in mind these are average Mustang buyers not wanting to sell a product) but each one is consistant with my gains and NO torque loss.

Has anyone but me noticed that there are no dynos to prove what I've claimed?

Matt
 

jrc_03_gt

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
786
3
0
Jun 19, 2004
#22
  • Jun 19, 2004
  • #22
we dont need one ! The proof is in the way the car performs. I have owned a 98 and now I have a 03 . Both lost low end TORQUE after exhaust mods. I did not say anything about horsepower. Just TORQUE.
 

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Jun 19, 2004
#23
  • Jun 19, 2004
  • #23
jrc_03_gt said:
we dont need one ! The proof is in the way the car performs. I have owned a 98 and now I have a 03 . Both lost low end TORQUE after exhaust mods. I did not say anything about horsepower. Just TORQUE.
Click to expand...

You can't show me one because you can't post something that doesn't exist.
(unless someone photochops one).

I just don't want this myth to continue.


Matt
 

~Stangzorized~

New Member
Feb 26, 2003
466
0
0
no mustang no care
Jun 19, 2004
#24
  • Jun 19, 2004
  • #24
Why would you even believe that... Taking out something restrictive = less horsepower? Right....
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Jun 19, 2004
#25
  • Jun 19, 2004
  • #25
hey guys i sprayed a 100shot and now im losing tire pressure...what gives
why do we even need dynos? we have sotp gurus here
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Jun 19, 2004
#26
  • Jun 19, 2004
  • #26
SOTP > Dyno > Track times
 

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Jun 20, 2004
#27
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #27
1990StangLX said:
SOTP > Dyno > Track times
Click to expand...


I'm not sure I agree.

Track times are highly dependant on weather and traction. Dynos are more controlled.

Matt
 

Dr. Wu 2000

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
554
0
0
Eastern, Pa.
Jun 20, 2004
#28
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #28
SOTP feel means a lot. My 2000 GT lost a little down low when I installed
MAC H-pipe w/cats. You could feel it wasn't as mean down low. Not a major
loss, but a loss none the less. The trade off is the beautiful music to your ears that the less restrictive H-pipe makes. Like everyone else said,
just get some gears.
 

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Jun 20, 2004
#29
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #29
It seems like the common denominator of those claiming a low end loss have the MAC product.

That may be the culprit.


Matt
 

jrc_03_gt

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
786
3
0
Jun 21, 2004
#30
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #30
Gears fixed mine!
 
K

kid_mustango02

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
35
0
0
Arkansucks
Jun 21, 2004
#31
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #31
I felt a little loss in the low end with bassani x w/cats too. Nothing to worry about though. It pulls alot better up top.....no complaints.
 

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Jun 21, 2004
#32
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #32
I'm gonna try to attach my before/after dyno...

Matt
 

Attachments

  • mattdyno.webp
    20.4 KB · Views: 332

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Jun 21, 2004
#33
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #33
Anyone feel free to show where I lost ANY torque, because if it's there, I can't find it......

Matt
 
P

pjdellenger80

New Member
Feb 2, 2004
180
1
0
MS
Jun 21, 2004
#34
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #34
I don't see any power loss and I don't feel like i lost anything, but gained. I love the h pipe, but kind of wish i would have went with a different brand. The mac h pipe was a little bit of a pain in the ass to fit up with the manifold and i still think their might be a small leak in the drivers side, but cant tell. Gears are a must and will soon be getting some installed.
 
C

CopMagnet5oh

New Member
Apr 15, 2004
64
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#35
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #35
SonicB said:
http://www.alternativeauto.com/techtips/techtips_46.html

http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/cgi-bin/flowmaster/faq.html?id=RRH4AQnZ

http://www.magnaflow.com/07techtips/faq/question10.htm

http://www.dynomax.com/techsupport.stm

flowmaster, dynomax and magnaflow have installed performance exhaust on millions and millions of cars over the last half century. two pipes 2.25" each is 4.5" worth of pipe. can you picture a 4.5" exhaust pipe sticking out the back of your mustang? now your have 5" worth of pipe and according to performance exhaust makers at your power level your did lose low end torque and perhaps gained 5hp somewhere above 4k rpm. which may not have been a good trade.
Click to expand...

twin 2.25" pipe = single 3" pipe

you're measuring area of a circle with diameters of 2.25 and 3 ", not straight lines.

just my .002
- Kons
 

jrc_03_gt

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
786
3
0
Jun 23, 2004
#36
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #36
I have owned 2 stangs 1st was a 98 gt and now a 2003 U will feel a loss down low when u open up the exhaust. It comes back and then some with 4.10 gears. I do not need a dyno . It is noticeable from sotp driving. I will say that the loss is small but the sound is well worth the little bit of loss in torque. I feel the off road h pipe is the better choice over the off road x pipe.
 

Betrayer00GT

Member
Apr 21, 2003
364
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Jun 23, 2004
#37
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #37
jrc_03_gt said:
I have owned 2 stangs 1st was a 98 gt and now a 2003 U will feel a loss down low when u open up the exhaust. It comes back and then some with 4.10 gears. I do not need a dyno . It is noticeable from sotp driving. I will say that the loss is small but the sound is well worth the little bit of loss in torque. I feel the off road h pipe is the better choice over the off road x pipe.
Click to expand...

SOTP feel is based on perception, right? Maybe you just think you lost low end because the High end is higher than it was before. Just a thought.

I doubt that 03trubluGT was making up his dyno run, and if he says that is just exhaust, I tend to believe him. I saw a similar result on the dyno that used to be (still is?) posted for the older version of the MRT H-pipe. It showed another brands X, their own H, and the stock, and the two after market pipes showed no loss of low end. They did show proportionally greater high end gain, tho. They only gained 9HP, tho. He gains 22 in his. Maybe because of other mods, unless that is a dyno for improvement with full exhaust.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Problems after exhaust install and 02 harness
  • djj62478
  • Jul 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
552
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
4v cobra exhaust compatibility
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
375
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
squeak93
J
O2 sens
  • JJ's90fox
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
195
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 12, 2025
Mustang5L5
Engine Cleaning Intake valves with lower intake off
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
444
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2026
limp
F
H-PIPE WIDTH
  • forango
  • May 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
299
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 28, 2025
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?