• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

lots of engine choices

  • Thread starter Thread starter jays2345
  • Start date Start date Jan 27, 2008

jays2345

New Member
Jan 24, 2008
8
0
0
Jan 27, 2008
#1
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #1
i want to install a new motor in my 65 im kinda leaning towards the edelbrock performer top end kit 302 365 horsepower setup.ive seen a few roller 5.0 shortblocks fairly reasonable will this work with this setup or would it be best to rebuild the 289 block with all new parts?either way i want to stay with in a 4 grand budget and make 350 horsepower
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 27, 2008
#2
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #2
350hp is nothing to make starting with a roller 302. Just the roller cam choice alone is worth the switch.
 

jays2345

New Member
Jan 24, 2008
8
0
0
Jan 27, 2008
#3
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #3
thanks for the reply so this combo will work provided i swap out the cam and lifters etc. in the edelbrock top end kit with a roller cam-lifter setup
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 27, 2008
#4
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #4
You're better off buying the heads & intake separately. Take a roller 302, top it with the RPM heads, RPM intake, 600 cfm carb and this will work with any O.E type hydraulic roller cam you choose.
 

jays2345

New Member
Jan 24, 2008
8
0
0
Jan 27, 2008
#5
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #5
got ya
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Jan 28, 2008
#6
  • Jan 28, 2008
  • #6
either kit you go with you need to check the piston to valve clearance! We installed a performer kit on a customers 302 and will still need to notch the pistons.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 28, 2008
#7
  • Jan 28, 2008
  • #7
Just my 2 cents but build a roller motor for it throw in a nice cam and a set of AFR 165's with a Performer RPM intake and a 650dp and have all kinds of fun
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/116_0307_ford_302_v8_engine_buildup/index.html
 

jays2345

New Member
Jan 24, 2008
8
0
0
Jan 28, 2008
#8
  • Jan 28, 2008
  • #8
i think that will be the cheapest and most dependable way to go, here my block im gonna start off with up next a a comp cams thumper roller<a ghref="http://www.flickr.com/photos/57116227@N00/2226627213/" title="fgf by jay 434, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2239/2226627213_c4130efb35_o.jpg" width="1102" height="704" alt="fgf" /></a>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
792
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
625
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
F
289 to 302 Engine
  • Fri Guy
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
667
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2025
Fri Guy
F
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?